Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Causation.Compare

Causative Alternation: Cross-Theory Bridge #

@cite{cuervo-2003} @cite{kratzer-1996} @cite{martin-rose-nichols-2025} @cite{schaefer-2008}

Connects four independent formalizations of the causative alternation:

  1. Semantic (Semantics.Intensional/Causative/): CausativeBuilder, production/dependence distinction
  2. Event-structural (Semantics.Events/EventStructure): Templates (accomplishment vs achievement)
  3. Syntactic (Minimalism/Core/Voice + Applicative): VoiceFlavor (agentive vs nonThematic) + VerbHead (vDO, vGO, vBE)
  4. Empirical (Phenomena/Causation/ThickThin): alternating, thick/thin classification

Key Bridge Results #

theorem Phenomena.Causation.Compare.thick_mostly_alternate_bridge :
have thickVerbs := List.filter (fun (x : ThickThin.ThickThinEntry) => x.thick) ThickThin.allEntries; have altThick := List.filter (fun (x : ThickThin.ThickThinEntry) => x.alternating) thickVerbs; altThick.length * 100 / thickVerbs.length 70

Most thick verbs alternate (have both Voice variants).

Alternating thick verbs: the transitive form has agentive Voice, the anticausative has non-thematic Voice. Example: break.

  • "John broke the vase" = Voice_AG + vDO + vGO + vBE
  • "The vase broke" = Voice_∅ + vGO + vBE

Non-alternating thick verbs (cut) only have the agentive Voice form.