Voice Head Flavors #
@cite{chomsky-2001} @cite{coon-2019} @cite{cuervo-2003} @cite{harley-2014} @cite{kratzer-1996} @cite{legate-2003} @cite{schaefer-2008} @cite{wood-2015}
Voice heads introduce (or fail to introduce) external arguments. The key typology from @cite{schaefer-2008}:
- Agentive: Introduces an agent external argument (@cite{kratzer-1996} Voice_AG)
- Causer: Introduces a causer (@cite{schaefer-2008} Voice_CAUSE)
- NonThematic: Semantically vacuous — no θ-role, but has a [D] feature requiring PF realization (anticausative SE in Romance; Muñoz @cite{munoz-perez-2026})
- Expletive: No specifier, no semantics (middle voice, dispositionals)
- Reflexive: [+θ, +D] with reflexive binding (@cite{wood-2015} Icelandic -st)
- Experiencer: [+θ, +D] introducing experiencer (@cite{wood-2015} subject-exp -st)
Key Claim #
Non-thematic Voice contributes no semantics. SE is a PF marker of absent external argument, not a semantic operator. Evidence: SE is optional in Chilean Spanish when Fission produces a syncretic clitic.
Voice–VerbHead Bridge (§§ 5–6) #
Voice and VerbHead are both "little-v" but encode different dimensions: Voice determines whether an external argument is introduced; VerbHead decomposes the event structure into subevents.
Following @cite{cuervo-2003} and @cite{pylkkanen-2008}, the CAUSE relation is modeled here as an independent VerbHead in the root's event decomposition — present in both causative and anticausative alternants. Voice contributes vDO (the agent's activity subevent) when it assigns a θ-role, but does NOT contribute the causal relation.
Note: @cite{wood-2015} uses a SINGLE v head whose interpretation
introduces CAUSE, rather than @cite{cuervo-2003}'s multi-headed
decomposition. The VerbHead decomposition used here is a linglib
modeling choice that captures the same Voice–CAUSE independence
using @cite{cuervo-2003}'s notation. See Fragments.Icelandic.Predicates
for the Icelandic fragment.
Typology of Voice head flavors.
Agentive Voice introduces an agent; causer Voice introduces a causer; non-thematic Voice has no semantics (anticausative SE); expletive Voice has neither specifier nor semantics (middles); passive Voice checks Case without assigning θ (@cite{collins-2005}: by); reflexive Voice introduces agent that binds internal argument (@cite{wood-2015}); experiencer Voice introduces experiencer external argument (@cite{wood-2015}).
- agentive : VoiceFlavor
- causer : VoiceFlavor
- nonThematic : VoiceFlavor
- expletive : VoiceFlavor
- impersonal : VoiceFlavor
- passive : VoiceFlavor
- antipassive : VoiceFlavor
- reflexive : VoiceFlavor
- experiencer : VoiceFlavor
Instances For
Equations
- Minimalism.instBEqVoiceFlavor.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
A Voice head with its properties.
- flavor : VoiceFlavor
The flavor determining argument introduction and semantics
- hasD : Bool
[D] subcategorization feature: requires a specifier at PF
- phaseHead : Bool
Is this Voice head a phase head? (v* = agentive Voice)
- checksCase : Bool
Does this Voice head check Case? In active, v checks accusative; in passive, Voice/by checks it (@cite{collins-2005}, p. 96: feature dissociation). Default false — only passive Voice checks Case.
- features : FeatureBundle
Agree-relevant features on Voice (e.g., [uOblique] for Mam =(y)a'). Default empty — most Voice heads carry no probe features.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Minimalism.instBEqVoiceHead.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Minimalism.instReprVoiceHead = { reprPrec := Minimalism.instReprVoiceHead.repr }
Does this Voice head introduce a θ-role?
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Does this Voice head have semantic content?
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Agentive Voice (transitive/unergative): introduces agent, is a phase head.
Equations
- Minimalism.voiceAgent = { flavor := Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.agentive, hasD := true, phaseHead := true }
Instances For
Causer Voice: introduces causer, is a phase head.
Equations
- Minimalism.voiceCauser = { flavor := Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.causer, hasD := true, phaseHead := true }
Instances For
Non-thematic Voice (anticausative): no θ-role, [D] for PF marking.
Equations
- Minimalism.voiceAnticausative = { flavor := Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.nonThematic, hasD := true, phaseHead := false }
Instances For
Expletive Voice (middle): no specifier, no semantics.
Equations
- Minimalism.voiceMiddle = { flavor := Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.expletive, hasD := false, phaseHead := false }
Instances For
Impersonal Voice (Finnish "passive"): demotes agent to an implicit generic human referent. Has semantics (existential closure over agent) but does not assign a θ-role to a syntactic specifier.
Equations
- Minimalism.voiceImpersonal = { flavor := Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.impersonal, hasD := false, phaseHead := false }
Instances For
Passive Voice: headed by by, checks Case but does not assign a θ-role — v assigns the θ-role to the external argument in Spec,vP. Passive v is NOT a phase head: the Case-checking feature that makes v* a strong phase head has been dissociated onto Voice/by.
This is why PartP (complement of v) remains accessible for smuggling: passive v is a defective v, not v*. Cf. @cite{chomsky-2001}: "only v* (transitive) is a strong phase."
Contested: @cite{legate-2003} argues passive v IS a phase head based on reconstruction and parasitic gap data. The current formalization follows @cite{collins-2005} and @cite{chomsky-2001}.
Equations
- Minimalism.voicePassive = { flavor := Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.passive, hasD := true, phaseHead := false, checksCase := true }
Instances For
Reflexive Voice (@cite{wood-2015}): introduces agent that is coreferent with the internal argument. [+θ, +D], phase head (assigns θ). Icelandic -st spells out this Voice in reflexive constructions.
Equations
- Minimalism.voiceReflexive = { flavor := Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.reflexive, hasD := true, phaseHead := true }
Instances For
Experiencer Voice (@cite{wood-2015}): introduces experiencer external argument. [+θ, +D], phase head. Icelandic subject-experiencer -st verbs (e.g., leiðast 'be bored').
Equations
- Minimalism.voiceExperiencer = { flavor := Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.experiencer, hasD := true, phaseHead := true }
Instances For
Agentive Voice assigns a θ-role.
Non-thematic Voice does NOT assign a θ-role (Muñoz Pérez's key claim).
Non-thematic Voice has no semantic contribution. This is the core claim of Muñoz @cite{munoz-perez-2026}: SE is a PF phenomenon.
Agentive Voice is a phase head (v* = Voice_AG).
Non-thematic Voice is NOT a phase head.
Impersonal Voice does NOT assign a θ-role (agent is existentially closed, not projected to a syntactic specifier).
Impersonal Voice HAS semantics: it contributes an existential closure over the agent variable, unlike non-thematic Voice which is vacuous.
Passive Voice does NOT assign a θ-role (v does).
Passive Voice IS NOT a phase head.
Passive Voice HAS semantic content (by mediates Case-checking).
Passive Voice checks Case (@cite{collins-2005}, p. 96: feature dissociation).
Reflexive Voice assigns a θ-role (@cite{wood-2015}).
Experiencer Voice assigns a θ-role (@cite{wood-2015}).
Only θ-assigning Voice flavors assign θ-roles.
Build the full verbal decomposition by combining Voice's contribution with the root-determined lower event structure.
Voice contributes vDO when it assigns a θ-role (agentive, causer, antipassive). The root supplies the lower structure, which now includes vCAUSE for change-of-state roots (@cite{wood-2015}, @cite{pylkkanen-2008}). CAUSE is independent of Voice:
- Voice_AG + [vCAUSE, vGO, vBE] → [vDO, vCAUSE, vGO, vBE] (causative)
- Voice_nonTh + [vCAUSE, vGO, vBE] → [vCAUSE, vGO, vBE] (anticausative)
- Voice_AG + [] → [vDO] (unergative activity)
- Voice_nonTh + [vBE] → [vBE] (stative)
Equations
- Minimalism.buildDecomposition voice rootStructure = if voice.assignsTheta = true then Minimalism.VerbHead.vDO :: rootStructure else rootStructure
Instances For
θ-assigning Voice prepends vDO to the root structure.
Non-θ Voice leaves the root structure unchanged.
Causative pattern: agentive Voice + [vCAUSE, vGO, vBE] yields a causative decomposition.
Inchoative pattern: non-thematic Voice + [vCAUSE, vGO, vBE] stays inchoative.
Activity pattern: agentive Voice + [] yields an activity.
State pattern: non-thematic Voice + [vBE] yields a state.
The causative alternation: same root structure [vCAUSE, vGO, vBE] is causative under agentive Voice but inchoative under non-thematic Voice. CAUSE is shared across both alternants — only vDO (from Voice) differs. This formalizes the @cite{wood-2015}/@cite{pylkkanen-2008} insight: CAUSE is independent of Voice.
Voice determines causativity: if the root structure is [vCAUSE, vGO, vBE], then whether the result is causative tracks exactly whether Voice assigns a θ-role.
CAUSE is present in both causative and anticausative decompositions. This is the independence claim: CAUSE is part of the root, not Voice.
In active, v (= agentive Voice) assigns θ AND controls Case-checking (Case is checked by v, not by Voice). In passive, these functions dissociate: v assigns θ (external argument in Spec,vP), while Voice/by checks Case.
Passive: θ-assignment and Case-checking are dissociated. Voice does NOT assign θ (v does), but Voice DOES check Case.
UTAH compliance: the external argument is structurally present (hasD = true) in BOTH active and passive. The external argument occupies the same position (Spec,vP) regardless of voice — satisfying the Uniformity of Theta Assignment Hypothesis.
Passive Voice does not prepend vDO: it does not assign θ, so
buildDecomposition passes the root structure through unchanged.
Agentive Voice corresponds to traditional v* (phase head). In the @cite{kratzer-1996}/Schäfer framework, agentive Voice replaces v*. Both agentive and causer Voice are phase heads.
Non-thematic and expletive Voice are NOT phase heads. Only θ-role-assigning Voice heads (agentive, causer) are phases.
Phase-head-ness correlates with θ-role assignment: Voice is a phase head iff it assigns a θ-role.
How a Voice head introduces (or fails to introduce) an external argument semantically.
thematicArgument: [+λx] — introduces agent/causer via λ-abstraction; the external argument occupies Spec,VoicePthematicExistential: [+∃x] — introduces agent/causer via ∃-binding; agent is semantically present but syntactically implicit (@cite{schaefer-2017} (31b)/(31e): "medio-passive Voice" {λe∃x[agent(e,x)]})expletive: [−λx] — no semantic contribution; Voice is semantically vacuous (anticausative SE, middles)
- thematicArgument : ExternalArgSemantics
- thematicExistential : ExternalArgSemantics
- expletive : ExternalArgSemantics
Instances For
Equations
- Minimalism.instBEqExternalArgSemantics.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The ±D / ±λx parametric decomposition of Voice heads.
From @cite{alexiadou-schaefer-2015} (p. 109, ex. (12)), extended by @cite{schaefer-2017}. Two binary parameters generate the core cross-linguistic typology of Voice:
- ±D (
selectsSpecifier): does Voice select a syntactic specifier? - ±λx (
extArgSemantics): does Voice introduce an external argument variable?
none values represent underspecification: the morpheme is compatible
with multiple parameter settings, with the actual setting determined by
independent factors (argument realization, verb class, pragmatics).
Indonesian ber- is fully underspecified ⟨none, none⟩
(@cite{beavers-udayana-2022}); Spanish se is underspecified for ±D.
Does Voice select a syntactic specifier (DP)?
some true= [+D],some false= [−D],none= underspecified- extArgSemantics : Option ExternalArgSemantics
Does Voice introduce semantic agentivity/causation?
none= underspecified
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Map each named VoiceFlavor to its position in the ±D / ±λx parameter space.
| Flavor | ±D | ±λx | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| agentive | +D | +λx (arg) | English active |
| causer | +D | +λx (arg) | Psych causative |
| reflexive | +D | +λx (arg) | Icelandic -st reflexive |
| experiencer | +D | +λx (arg) | Icelandic subject-exp -st |
| nonThematic | +D | −λx | Romance anticausative SE |
| expletive | −D | −λx | English dispositional middle |
| impersonal | −D | +∃x | Finnish impersonal |
| passive | +D | −λx | English passive (by) |
Note: nonThematic and passive occupy the same cell [+D, −λx].
They differ in Case-checking (VoiceHead.checksCase), which is
a property of the full VoiceHead, not of the parametric decomposition.
Equations
- Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.agentive.toParams = { selectsSpecifier := some true, extArgSemantics := some Minimalism.ExternalArgSemantics.thematicArgument }
- Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.causer.toParams = { selectsSpecifier := some true, extArgSemantics := some Minimalism.ExternalArgSemantics.thematicArgument }
- Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.antipassive.toParams = { selectsSpecifier := some true, extArgSemantics := some Minimalism.ExternalArgSemantics.thematicArgument }
- Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.reflexive.toParams = { selectsSpecifier := some true, extArgSemantics := some Minimalism.ExternalArgSemantics.thematicArgument }
- Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.experiencer.toParams = { selectsSpecifier := some true, extArgSemantics := some Minimalism.ExternalArgSemantics.thematicArgument }
- Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.nonThematic.toParams = { selectsSpecifier := some true, extArgSemantics := some Minimalism.ExternalArgSemantics.expletive }
- Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.expletive.toParams = { selectsSpecifier := some false, extArgSemantics := some Minimalism.ExternalArgSemantics.expletive }
- Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.impersonal.toParams = { selectsSpecifier := some false, extArgSemantics := some Minimalism.ExternalArgSemantics.thematicExistential }
- Minimalism.VoiceFlavor.passive.toParams = { selectsSpecifier := some true, extArgSemantics := some Minimalism.ExternalArgSemantics.expletive }
Instances For
The parametric decomposition of a VoiceHead, derived from its flavor.
Instances For
Does this parameter setting assign a theta role?
Returns none when underspecified.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Are two VoiceParams settings compatible? Two settings are compatible if they agree on all specified dimensions. An underspecified dimension (none) is compatible with anything.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Is this parameter setting fully specified (no underspecification)?
Equations
Instances For
All named VoiceFlavors produce fully specified params.
VoiceHead.assignsTheta is consistent with VoiceParams.assignsTheta?: for fully-specified params, they agree.
Compatibility is reflexive.
A fully underspecified VoiceParams is compatible with every named VoiceFlavor — the key property for Indonesian ber-.