Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Syntax.Minimalism.Core.Applicative

Applicative Heads #

@cite{cuervo-2003} @cite{pylkknen-2008} @cite{wood-2015}

Applicative heads introduce applied arguments (benefactives, goals, sources) into the verbal structure. The high/low distinction determines whether the applied argument relates to the event as a whole (high) or to the theme (low).

Low applicatives further split into recipient (transfer to) and source (transfer from), following @cite{pylkknen-2008} Table 1.1.

Semantic Denotations (@cite{pylkknen-2008}) #

High/Low Asymmetry (@cite{pylkknen-2008}, @cite{schaefer-2008}) #

High applicatives require Voice with event semantics; low applicatives are independent of Voice. This predicts high Appl is blocked when Voice is semantically null (middles, anticausatives).

Note: @cite{wood-2015} Ch. 5 argues that Icelandic lacks true high applicatives entirely. The high/low interaction modeled here follows the cross-linguistic typology of @cite{pylkknen-2008}.

High vs low applicatives (@cite{pylkknen-2008}, Table 1.1).

  • High: Above VP, relates applied argument to the event (benefactive: Chaga "he ate food for wife")
  • Low recipient: Below VP, transfer-of-possession to the applied argument (English DOC: "I sent him a letter")
  • Low source: Below VP, transfer-of-possession from the applied argument (Korean, Hebrew possessor datives, Japanese adversity passives)
Instances For
    Equations
    Instances For

      The semantic relation an applicative head contributes.

      • eventRelation: λx.λe. R(e, x) — relates individual to event (high Appl)
      • possessionTo: λx.λy. HAVE(x, y) — transfer-to (low recipient)
      • possessionFrom: λx.λy. HAVE-FROM(y, x) — transfer-from (low source)
      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Does this applicative type require event-level semantics from Voice? High applicatives relate to the event, so they need Voice to contribute event semantics. Low applicatives relate to the theme and are independent of Voice.

          Equations
          Instances For

            An applicative head with its type and properties.

            • applType : ApplType

              High or low (recipient/source)

            • assignsDative : Bool

              Does the applied argument get dative case?

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For
                Equations
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Canonical high applicative (ethical dative).

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Canonical low recipient applicative (DOC, possessive dative).

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Canonical low source applicative.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Is this applicative licensed in the context of a given Voice head?

                          High applicatives require Voice with event semantics; when Voice is semantically null (middles, anticausatives), high Appl is blocked. Low applicatives relate to the theme and are always licensed (@cite{pylkknen-2008}).

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            High applicatives require event semantics.

                            Ethical datives (high Appl) are licensed with agentive Voice.

                            High Appl is BLOCKED with middle Voice (no event semantics) (@cite{pylkknen-2008}).

                            Possessive datives (low Appl) survive in middles.

                            def Minimalism.ApplHead.specCanBearCase (appl : ApplHead) (bearerHasCase : Bool) :

                            Can a given element merge in SpecApplP?

                            @cite{wood-2015} Ch. 5 (§5.3.2): Appl assigns dative case to its specifier. Therefore only elements that can bear case can merge in SpecApplP. The Icelandic clitic -st lacks case features and is thus blocked from SpecApplP, even though it can merge in SpecVoiceP and SpecpP (where no case is assigned to the specifier).

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              -st (caseless) cannot merge in SpecApplP (@cite{wood-2015} §5.3.2).

                              A case-bearing DP CAN merge in SpecApplP.