@cite{cumming-2026} Verification Theorems #
@cite{cumming-2026}
Verification theorems for the cross-linguistic nonfuture downstream generalization from @cite{cumming-2026}. Paradigm data lives in Fragment files; this file imports them and proves the empirical predictions.
Key Results #
nonfuture_downstream: generic master theorem — any paradigm entry whose EP constraint is nonfuture entails T ≤ A (downstream evidence)- Per-entry corollaries: one-liner applications of the generic lemma
- Per-entry
isNonfutureverification: breaks if EP changed future_no_downstream: future entries do not require downstream evidencekorean_te_ney_ep_diverge: EP and UP factorize independently in Korean
All paradigm entries across the three languages.
Equations
Instances For
Nonfuture paradigm entries (across all languages).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Future paradigm entries (across all languages).
Equations
Instances For
English simple past is nonfuture (EP = downstream).
English present progressive is nonfuture (EP = downstream).
Korean -te PAST is nonfuture (EP = strictDownstream).
Korean -te PRESENT is nonfuture (EP = contemporaneous).
Korean -ney PAST is nonfuture (EP = strictDownstream).
Korean -ney PRESENT is nonfuture (EP = contemporaneous).
Bulgarian NFUT + -l is nonfuture (EP = downstream).
Generic nonfuture downstream: any paradigm entry
whose EP constraint is nonfuture entails T ≤ A (downstream evidence).
Delegates to EPCondition.nonfuture_implies_downstream.
English simple past EP entails downstream evidence.
English present progressive EP entails downstream evidence.
Korean -te PAST EP entails downstream evidence.
Korean -te PRESENT EP entails downstream evidence.
Korean -ney PAST EP entails downstream evidence.
Korean -ney PRESENT EP entails downstream evidence.
Bulgarian NFUT + -l EP entails downstream evidence.
Future entries do not require downstream evidence: the EP constraint is either trivially true (English bare future) or imposes A < T (prospective), which is the opposite of T ≤ A.
Korean -te and -ney EP diverge on the same tense: for present tense, -te requires T = A (contemporaneous evidence) while -ney requires T = A ∧ T = S (contemporaneous + speech-time present). The UP constraints differ: -te has T < S, -ney has T = S. This shows EP and UP factorize independently in the morphology.