Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Cumming2026

@cite{cumming-2026} Verification Theorems #

@cite{cumming-2026}

Verification theorems for the cross-linguistic nonfuture downstream generalization from @cite{cumming-2026}. Paradigm data lives in Fragment files; this file imports them and proves the empirical predictions.

Key Results #

  1. nonfuture_downstream: generic master theorem — any paradigm entry whose EP constraint is nonfuture entails T ≤ A (downstream evidence)
  2. Per-entry corollaries: one-liner applications of the generic lemma
  3. Per-entry isNonfuture verification: breaks if EP changed
  4. future_no_downstream: future entries do not require downstream evidence
  5. korean_te_ney_ep_diverge: EP and UP factorize independently in Korean

Nonfuture paradigm entries (across all languages).

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    Generic nonfuture downstream: any paradigm entry whose EP constraint is nonfuture entails T ≤ A (downstream evidence). Delegates to EPCondition.nonfuture_implies_downstream.

    theorem Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Cumming2026.future_no_downstream :
    Fragments.English.Tense.future.epConstraint { speechTime := 10, perspectiveTime := 10, referenceTime := 0, eventTime := 5, acquisitionTime := 0 } ¬Semantics.Tense.Evidential.downstreamEvidence { speechTime := 10, perspectiveTime := 10, referenceTime := 0, eventTime := 5, acquisitionTime := 0 }

    Future entries do not require downstream evidence: the EP constraint is either trivially true (English bare future) or imposes A < T (prospective), which is the opposite of T ≤ A.

    Korean -te and -ney EP diverge on the same tense: for present tense, -te requires T = A (contemporaneous evidence) while -ney requires T = A ∧ T = S (contemporaneous + speech-time present). The UP constraints differ: -te has T < S, -ney has T = S. This shows EP and UP factorize independently in the morphology.