@cite{alstott-aravind-2026}: On aspectual coercion in before- and after-clauses #
@cite{alstott-aravind-2026} @cite{rett-2020}
Self-paced reading data from 4 experiments testing @cite{rett-2020}'s prediction that aspectual coercion (INCHOAT, COMPLET) incurs measurable processing cost. Under-specification theories (e.g. @cite{anscombe-1964}) do not predict such costs.
Results Summary #
| Exp | Coercion type | RT effect | Naturalness | Supports Rett? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | INCHOAT (within-modifier) | null | null | No |
| 1b | COMPLET (at-modifier) | sig verb+1 | sig lower | Yes |
| 2 | COMPLET (before-clause) | sig verb+2† | sig lower | Yes |
| 3 | INCHOAT (subj-experiencer) | null | null | No |
| 4 | INCHOAT (after-clause) | sig verb+2† | sig lower | Yes |
† = exploratory analysis (pre-registered verb/verb+1 regions were null)
Key findings:
- Completive coercion consistently shows processing cost (Exps 1b, 2)
- Inchoative coercion in after-clauses shows delayed cost (Exp 4)
- Inchoative coercion in within-modifier contexts shows no cost (Exps 1a, 3)
- Complement coercion (sanity check) replicates across all experiments
- Delayed spillover (verb+2) in connective contexts vs verb+1 in modifier contexts may reflect pragmatic vs semantic coercion (§5.3, §7.3)
Experiment identifiers. Exp 1 has two sub-experiments (a and b).
- exp1a : Experiment
- exp1b : Experiment
- exp2 : Experiment
- exp3 : Experiment
- exp4 : Experiment
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Types of aspectual coercion tested across experiments.
- inchoative : CoercionType
- completive : CoercionType
- complement : CoercionType
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Spillover region where an effect was measured.
- verb : SpilloverRegion
- verbPlus1 : SpilloverRegion
- verbPlus2 : SpilloverRegion
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Result from a self-paced reading experiment.
- experiment : Experiment
- condition : String
- coercionType : CoercionType
- effectBeta : ℚ
Mixed-effects regression coefficient (log RT)
- se : ℚ
Standard error of the coefficient
- pValue : ℚ
p-value
- region : SpilloverRegion
Spillover region where effect was measured
- significant : Bool
Whether the effect reached significance (Bonferroni-corrected α = 0.025)
- exploratory : Bool
Whether the analysis was exploratory (not pre-registered)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Naturalness rating result (ordinal logistic regression).
- experiment : Experiment
- coercionType : CoercionType
- ratingBeta : ℚ
Regression coefficient for coercion vs control
- se : ℚ
Standard error of the coefficient
- pValue : ℚ
p-value
- significant : Bool
Significant difference?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Exp 1a: INCHOAT with within-modifier + be-stative verb. E.g. "Within fifteen minutes Jessica was mad in office hours." No significant RT slowdown; no naturalness difference.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Exp 1b: COMPLET with at-modifier + accomplishment verb. E.g. "At 9pm sharp Hector built the humble tent." Significant slowdown at verb+1; lower naturalness. Supports Rett's COMPLET operator.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Exp 2: COMPLET in before-clause with accomplishment EE. E.g. "Emma was irritable before Hector built the tent in the woods." Pre-registered regions (verb, verb+1) showed null effects. Exploratory verb+2 analysis found significant slowdown; lower naturalness. Delayed effect consistent with pragmatic (vs semantic) coercion.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Exp 3: INCHOAT with subject-experiencer verbs in within-modifier context. E.g. "Within fifteen minutes Jessica tolerated the unhelpful professor." No significant RT effect; no naturalness difference.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Exp 4: INCHOAT in after-clause with subject-experiencer EE. E.g. "Dave was regretful after Lara feared the large dog." Pre-registered regions (verb, verb+1) showed null effects. Exploratory verb+2 analysis found significant slowdown; lower naturalness. INCHOAT cost detected in after-clauses but not within-modifier contexts.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Complement coercion (e.g., "continued his article") in Exp 1a at noun+1. This replicates across all experiments, confirming paradigm sensitivity.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Complement coercion in Exp 1b at noun+1.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Complement coercion in Exp 3 at noun+1.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Rett's theory correctly predicts completive coercion costs where they occur. Both Exps 1b (at-modifier) and 2 (before-clause) show significant slowdowns.
Rett's theory correctly predicts inchoative coercion cost in after-clauses. Exp 4 shows significant slowdown for after-start readings.
Within-modifier INCHOAT shows no cost: Exps 1a and 3 show null results. This dissociation (null in within-modifier, significant in after-clause) suggests INCHOAT cost is construction-specific, not universal. The paper's §8.2 proposes a non-coercive, Krifka-style scalar implicature analysis for atelic within-modifier sentences.
Complement coercion sanity check passes in both sub-experiments.
Processing measure: all experiments use self-paced reading.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Delayed effect in connective contexts: cost at verb+2 (not verb+1). Both connective experiments (2, 4) show verb+2 spillover, while the modifier experiment (1b) shows verb+1. Consistent with pragmatic coercion in connectives being slower to detect than semantic coercion in modifier contexts. Both connective results are exploratory.
Exp 2 tests the Fragment's coercedReading for before:
COMPLET triggers the before-finish reading.
Exp 4 tests the Fragment's coercedReading for after:
INCHOAT triggers the after-start reading.
COMPLET is consistently costly across both completive experiments.
INCHOAT cost is construction-specific: present in after-clauses (Exp 4), absent in within-modifier contexts (Exps 1a, 3).
Completive effect size exceeds inchoative in modifier contexts.
RT significance and naturalness significance converge in all 5 experiments: every experiment that shows an RT effect also shows a naturalness effect, and every null RT result has a null naturalness result.
Tagalog overtly marks what English coerces covertly: PFV.AIA (ability/involuntary action) → before-finish (COMPLET); PFV.NEUT (neutral) → before-start (no coercion).
Serbian overtly marks what English coerces covertly: perfective → before-finish (COMPLET); imperfective → before-start (no coercion).
Triple convergence: English processing data (Exp 2), Tagalog morphology, and Serbian morphology all independently support covert COMPLET.
The paper's central finding: Rett's ambiguity theory predicts processing asymmetries between readings, and this prediction is confirmed by the data. Under-specification theories (Anscombe, B&C, O&ST) do not predict such costs.
The data confirms the prediction: significant processing costs exist for coerced readings (Exps 1b, 2, 4). The only theory that predicts this is Rett's, which posits covert coercion operators.
Rett's coercion operators have overt cross-linguistic reflexes: the theory posits coercion, and languages like Tagalog and Serbian realize it morphologically.