Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Presupposition.Studies.DegenTonhauser2021

@cite{degen-tonhauser-2021}: Prior Beliefs Modulate Projection #

@cite{qing-goodman-lassiter-2016}

Prior beliefs modulate projection. Open Mind 5:59–70.

Core Finding #

Higher prior probability of complement content leads to stronger projection inferences, at both the group and individual participant level.

This is the first systematic demonstration that subjective prior beliefs about the world modulate presupposition projection across a wide range of clause-embedding predicates.

Experiments #

Experiment 1 (within-participant, N=286) #

Experiment 2 (between-participant replication) #

Replication #

By-predicate projection ranking replicates Tonhauser & Degen 2020 with Spearman r = .991.

Theoretical Significance #

The prior-belief effect motivates probabilistic models of projection (e.g., @cite{qing-goodman-lassiter-2016}). Both existing probabilistic projection models (Qing et al. 2016, Stevens et al. 2017) are couched within the RSA framework, which standardly assumes utterance interpretation is modulated by listeners' prior beliefs.

The 20 clause-embedding predicates investigated in D&T 2021, listed alphabetically as in Figure 1C. The set spans cognitive (know), emotive (be annoyed), communication (announce), and inferential (prove) predicates. For the traditional factive/nonfactive classification of these predicates, see DegenTonhauser2022.traditionalClass.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A regression coefficient from a mixed-effects model.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          The three levels of prior-belief predictor tested in Experiment 1. The individual-level model captures the most variance (lowest BIC). Experiment 2 is between-participant, so only categorical and group-level are tested there (individual priors unavailable).

          • categorical : PriorLevel

            Binary: high vs low fact condition.

          • groupLevel : PriorLevel

            Continuous: group-level mean prior probability by item.

          • individualLevel : PriorLevel

            Continuous: each participant's own prior probability rating. Only available in within-participant designs (Experiment 1).

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Experiment 1: prior manipulation was successful. Higher-probability facts yielded higher prior ratings than lower-probability facts (β = 0.45, SE = 0.01, t = 31.12).

              Equations
              Instances For

                Individual-level prior beliefs predict projection better than group-level beliefs, which predict better than categorical (binary) beliefs. This is the key model-comparison result.

                The prior effect is positive at every level of analysis in Experiment 1. A positive β means higher prior → stronger projection.

                The prior effect replicates in the between-participant design at both applicable levels (categorical and group-level).

                Individual-level prior is not available in the between-participant design.

                The prior effect replicates across experiments: Exp 1 (within-participant) and Exp 2b (between-participant) show the same direction at the categorical level.

                Spearman rank correlation between Exp 1 by-predicate certainty ratings (collapsing over facts) and Tonhauser & Degen 2020 Experiment 1a.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Both replication correlations are very high (> 0.95), confirming that the by-predicate ranking is robust across experiments.

                  Mean certainty ratings by predicate and fact condition from Experiment 1. Values computed from the data at github.com/judith-tonhauser/projective-probability (results/9-prior-projection), rounded to 2 decimal places. Ordered by overall projection strength (Figure 3 x-axis).

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    The core finding: prior beliefs modulate projection for EVERY predicate. High-prior content projects more strongly than low-prior content across all 20 predicates.

                    Map each D&T predicate to its Fragment verb entry (18 of 20). "be annoyed" and "be right" are copular — use toPredicateCore for full coverage.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Map each D&T predicate to its VerbCore — the semantic spine shared by verbal and copular entries. Covers all 20 predicates. Copular entries go through ClauseEmbeddingAdj.toVerbCore (English-specific realization: copula + adjective).

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        All 20 D&T predicates (alphabetical).

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          18 of 20 predicates have VerbEntry entries (all except copular "be annoyed" and "be right").