Gradient Projection in Inference Judgments #
@cite{degen-tonhauser-2021} @cite{degen-tonhauser-2022} @cite{tonhauser-beaver-roberts-simons-2018}
Theory-neutral empirical observations about gradient patterns in presupposition projection and inference judgments.
Core Observations #
Projection is gradient across predicates. Aggregate inference judgments for clause-embedding predicates vary continuously — there is no categorical gap separating "factive" from "nonfactive" predicates in projection strength.
Prior beliefs modulate projection. Higher prior probability of the complement content leads to stronger projection, at both the group level and the individual participant level (@cite{degen-tonhauser-2021}).
The gradient pattern is robust. The by-predicate ranking of projection strength replicates across experiments with Spearman's r = .991 (@cite{degen-tonhauser-2021}, Exp 1 vs Tonhauser & Degen 2020).
Optionally factive predicates overlap with canonically factive ones. Some "optionally factive" predicates (e.g., inform) project more strongly than some "canonically factive" predicates (e.g., reveal) (@cite{degen-tonhauser-2022}).
Sources of Gradience #
Gradience in inference judgments may arise from multiple sources:
Resolved (type-level) indeterminacy: Different occasions of use resolve an ambiguity differently (lexical ambiguity, structural ambiguity, QUD). This produces gradience at the experiment level but discreteness at the trial level.
Unresolved (token-level) indeterminacy: Uncertainty persists even after fixing the interpretation — vagueness, world knowledge, task effects, response error. This produces genuine gradience at every level.
Whether gradient projection reflects resolved or unresolved indeterminacy is a theoretical question addressed by study files, not settled by the data alone.
Sources of gradience in inference judgment tasks.
- resolved : GradienceSource
Resolved on each occasion but varying across occasions (type-level).
- unresolved : GradienceSource
Persists even after fixing the interpretation (token-level).
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Subtypes of resolved indeterminacy.
- lexicalAmbiguity : ResolvedSource
- syntacticAmbiguity : ResolvedSource
- semanticAmbiguity : ResolvedSource
- qud : ResolvedSource
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Subtypes of unresolved indeterminacy.
- vagueness : UnresolvedSource
- worldKnowledge : UnresolvedSource
- responseStrategy : UnresolvedSource
- responseError : UnresolvedSource
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The prior belief effect: higher prior → stronger projection.
Equations
- p.priorEffect = p.highPrior - p.lowPrior
Instances For
Prior beliefs modulate projection: the effect is positive for every predicate studied. This is the core finding of @cite{degen-tonhauser-2021}.
Equations
- Phenomena.Presupposition.Gradience.priorBeliefModulatesProjection profile = (profile.highPrior > profile.lowPrior)
Instances For
A predicate's projection variability across contexts, collapsing over prior probability. The mean and range characterize how "reliably factive" a predicate is.
- mean : Float
Mean projection across all contexts.
- bimodal : Bool
Whether the predicate shows bimodal responses (modes near 0 and 1).
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The key empirical observation: no categorical gap between traditional classes in projection strength. Formalized as: for any threshold that separates "factive" from "nonfactive" by projection rating, at least one predicate from each traditional class falls on the wrong side.
- optFactivePred : String
An "optionally factive" predicate that projects more strongly than some "canonically factive" predicate.
- canonFactivePred : String
- optFactiveRating : Float
- canonFactiveRating : Float
Instances For
Witnessed by inform (0.81) > reveal (0.70) in @cite{degen-tonhauser-2022} Experiment 1a (sliding scale, collapsing over facts).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.