Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Presupposition.Gradience

Gradient Projection in Inference Judgments #

@cite{degen-tonhauser-2021} @cite{degen-tonhauser-2022} @cite{tonhauser-beaver-roberts-simons-2018}

Theory-neutral empirical observations about gradient patterns in presupposition projection and inference judgments.

Core Observations #

  1. Projection is gradient across predicates. Aggregate inference judgments for clause-embedding predicates vary continuously — there is no categorical gap separating "factive" from "nonfactive" predicates in projection strength.

  2. Prior beliefs modulate projection. Higher prior probability of the complement content leads to stronger projection, at both the group level and the individual participant level (@cite{degen-tonhauser-2021}).

  3. The gradient pattern is robust. The by-predicate ranking of projection strength replicates across experiments with Spearman's r = .991 (@cite{degen-tonhauser-2021}, Exp 1 vs Tonhauser & Degen 2020).

  4. Optionally factive predicates overlap with canonically factive ones. Some "optionally factive" predicates (e.g., inform) project more strongly than some "canonically factive" predicates (e.g., reveal) (@cite{degen-tonhauser-2022}).

Sources of Gradience #

Gradience in inference judgments may arise from multiple sources:

Whether gradient projection reflects resolved or unresolved indeterminacy is a theoretical question addressed by study files, not settled by the data alone.

Sources of gradience in inference judgment tasks.

  • resolved : GradienceSource

    Resolved on each occasion but varying across occasions (type-level).

  • unresolved : GradienceSource

    Persists even after fixing the interpretation (token-level).

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Subtypes of resolved indeterminacy.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Subtypes of unresolved indeterminacy.

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              A projection profile records how strongly a predicate's complement projects, separated by prior probability condition.

              • highPrior : Float

                Mean certainty rating with higher-probability background fact.

              • lowPrior : Float

                Mean certainty rating with lower-probability background fact.

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  The prior belief effect: higher prior → stronger projection.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Prior beliefs modulate projection: the effect is positive for every predicate studied. This is the core finding of @cite{degen-tonhauser-2021}.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      A predicate's projection variability across contexts, collapsing over prior probability. The mean and range characterize how "reliably factive" a predicate is.

                      • mean : Float

                        Mean projection across all contexts.

                      • bimodal : Bool

                        Whether the predicate shows bimodal responses (modes near 0 and 1).

                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          The key empirical observation: no categorical gap between traditional classes in projection strength. Formalized as: for any threshold that separates "factive" from "nonfactive" by projection rating, at least one predicate from each traditional class falls on the wrong side.

                          Instances For

                            Witnessed by inform (0.81) > reveal (0.70) in @cite{degen-tonhauser-2022} Experiment 1a (sliding scale, collapsing over facts).

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For