Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Morphology.Studies.Bhadra2024

Bhadra 2024: Verb roots encode outcomes #

@cite{bhadra-2024}

Bhadra, D. (2024). Verb roots encode outcomes: argument structure and lexical semantics of reversal and restitution. Linguistics and Philosophy 47: 557–610.

Summary #

The reversative prefix un- and the restitutive prefix re- are sensitive to the outcome set of the base verb root. All verb roots come equipped with sets of outcomes (possible states of the object after the action). The cardinality of this set determines affix compatibility:

Key formalizations #

  1. ForceTransmissionClass classifies verbs by impact type (§§2, 3, 4)
  2. BoundaryStates formalizes res/pre operators for state equivalence (§5.2)
  3. LevinClass.forceTransmissionClass bridges Levin classes to outcome classes
  4. Per-verb un- and re- predictions verified against empirical data from (12), (45)

Only surface contact verbs (PFC class) allow un-: - (d) Surface contact: unpin, unwrap, untwist, unpack, unplug ✓ - (a) Physical property: *unpaint, *unclean, *unfix, *unbreak ✗ - (b) Transforms: *unturn, *uncarve ✗ - (e) Creation: *unbuild, *unconstruct ✗ - (f) Consumption: *undestroy, *uneat ✗ - (g) Degree achievements: *unfill, *unwarm ✗ - (h) No change: *unswim, *unwalk ✗

re- is more permissive than un-: - (a) Physical property: repaint ✓, reclean ✓, refix ✓, rebreak ✓ - (d) Surface contact: repin ✓, rewrap ✓, retwist ✓ - (e) Creation: rebuild ✓, reconstruct ✓, recreate ✓ - (g) Degree achievements: refill ⊳, rewarm ⊳ But re- is blocked when the object is eliminated: - (f) Consumption: *redestroy, *reeat ✗ - (b) Transforms: *retransform ✗ (mostly) - IE: *rehit, *rescrub ✗ - No change: *reswim, *rewalk ✗

Physical property and creation COS classes allow re-.

Consumption, destruction, killing COS classes block re-.

No-change classes block re- (paper's (45h): *reswim, *rewalk).

Possible states of a parchment under folding. Illustrates the multi-membered outcome set of a PFC verb: folding can yield any of these states depending on the force and manner of folding.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      fold(parchment): flat → folded

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        unfold(parchment): folded → flat (reverses fold)

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Reversibility: fold and unfold satisfy the inverse equivalence condition. res(fold) = pre(unfold) and res(unfold) = pre(fold).

          Restitution: refold achieves the same result as fold. res(refold) = res(fold).

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            States of a wall under painting. Singleton outcome set: painting deterministically yields the painted state.

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  *unpaint is blocked: color (24) is COS with singleton outcomes. un- requires multi-membered outcomes (PFC only).

                  @cite{bhadra-2024} reclassifies the bend class (45.2) from COS to PFC.

                  @cite{levin-1993}: bend has changeOfState = true (diagnosed by causative/inchoative alternation: "the paper folded" / "she folded the paper").

                  @cite{bhadra-2024}: fold has multi-membered outcomes (slightly creased, halfway bent, tightly folded, etc.) → PFC, not COS. The change IS possible but not to a SPECIFIC fixed state.

                  This is the paper's central theoretical move: outcome set structure is a finer-grained classification than the traditional COS label.

                  @cite{rappaport-hovav-levin-2024}'s motionContact template corresponds exactly to @cite{bhadra-2024}'s IE class. The wipe class (10.4) has the motionContact template and is classified as IE.

                  End-to-end chain: the Fragment entry for "kick" (Levin 18.1 hit class) derives IE classification and correctly predicts both un- and re- blocking. kick.levinClass → .hit → .impingementEffecting → unCompatible=false, reCompatible=false

                  End-to-end chain: the Fragment entry for "bend" (Levin 45.2) derives PFC classification and correctly predicts both un- and re- compatibility. bend.levinClass → .bend → .potentialForChange → unCompatible=true, reCompatible=true

                  End-to-end chain: the Fragment entry for "break" (Levin 45.1) derives COS classification → un- blocked, re- allowed. break.levinClass → .break_ → .integralChange → unCompatible=false, reCompatible=true

                  VRO for "fold": PFC verb with multi-membered outcome set. The parchment can end up in any of several states after folding. Outcome set = {slightlyCreased, folded, tightlyFolded} (3 members). Threshold set = {flat, slightlyCreased} (contextual pre-states).

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    fold's outcome set is multi-membered: slightlyCreased ≠ folded.

                    VRO for "break": COS verb with singleton outcome set. Breaking yields exactly one lexically specified result: broken.

                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          break's singleton outcome set blocks un-: *unbreak is predicted to fail because |O| = 1, so the multi-membered presupposition of un- (eq. 66) cannot be satisfied.

                          VRO for "hit": IE verb with singleton outcome set (surface alteration). The object's surface is altered in exactly one way.

                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                hit's singleton outcome set blocks un-: *unhit is predicted to fail for the same reason as *unbreak.

                                VRO for "destroy": COS consumption verb with singleton outcome set. The outcome (ceased to exist) is also a blocking threshold for re-, since the object cannot be acted on again after being destroyed.

                                Instances For
                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For
                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      destroy blocks un- (singleton outcomes).

                                      The three-way distributional split is derived from outcome set structure:

                                      • PFC (fold): multi-membered → un- possible
                                      • COS (break): singleton → un- blocked
                                      • IE (hit): singleton → un- blocked

                                      The theorems in § 10 prove that un- is BLOCKED for certain verb classes. But blocking theorems alone don't guarantee the compositional semantics is non-vacuous. We also need to show un- and re- are SATISFIABLE for the classes that should allow them. The following construct concrete event witnesses and state functions to demonstrate positive satisfiability.

                                      Positive existence: un- IS satisfiable for PFC verbs. Constructs a concrete witness showing unSem holds for fold.

                                      Positive existence: re- IS satisfiable for PFC verbs. Three-event scenario: fold(ev₁), unfold(ev₂), refold(ev₃). The rePresupposition of ev₃ is witnessed by ev₁ (prior fold with matching result state).

                                      Positive existence: re- IS satisfiable for COS verbs. COS verbs (break) block un- but allow re-. This demonstrates that reSem is satisfiable for break despite singleton outcomes.

                                      Cross-layer agreement: Boolean and compositional predictions align. The Boolean layer (ForceTransmissionClass) and compositional layer (VRO) agree on the un- prediction for fold (both allow) and break (both block).

                                      With APPLIES in the semantics, we can now compositionally derive that *redestroy is blocked — not just via the Boolean layer, but because APPLIES fails when the object has ceased to exist. This closes the gap between the Boolean prediction (destroy_no_re) and the compositional semantics (reSem).

                                      VRO for "destroy" with state-aware APPLIES: force can only be exerted on an object that exists at the start of the event. The applies predicate is parameterized by a state function, capturing the fact that you can't destroy what doesn't exist.

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        Compositional re- blocking for destroy. With state-aware APPLIES, reSem is unsatisfiable for destroy because the re-event requires APPLIES(e)(x), but the object has ceased to exist after the first destruction. The proof shows the assertion's APPLIES condition directly contradicts the post-destruction state.