Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Iconicity.Studies.SchlenkerEtAl2026

Schlenker, Lamberton & Lamberton (2026) #

@cite{schlenker-lamberton-lamberton-2026}

Traveling Shots in Language: Towards an Analysis of Dynamic Viewpoints in ASL. To appear in Linguistic Inquiry.

Core Contribution #

Extends Iconological Semantics (@cite{schlenker-lamberton-2024}) by showing that viewpoint variables may denote dynamic (traveling) viewpoints — functions from time-world pairs to static viewpoints — not just static observation points.

In ASL, a classifier denoting a static object (e.g., TREE-cl) can move in signing space to represent the object's apparent motion from a moving character's perspective. This is the linguistic analogue of a traveling camera shot in film.

Two Analyses #

  1. Analysis I (§7): All viewpoint variables can be dynamic. Relative motion arises whenever a viewpoint variable takes a non-constant value.

  2. Analysis II (§8): Only viewpoints introduced by Role Shift (as overt context shift) can be dynamic. Standard viewpoint variables denote static viewpoints. Under Role Shift, a distinguished variable π* reads the character's dynamic viewpoint from the shifted context.

The paper leaves both options open, pending a consensus on the definition of Role Shift.

Data #

Paradigms were elicited from two Deaf native ASL signers. Acceptability is on a 7-point scale (7 = best, 1 = worst). Classifier direction (left vs. right) systematically determines the character's inferred path.

The static viewpoint analysis is a special case of the dynamic one. When a viewpoint is constant, dynamic projection reduces to time-invariant projection. The dynamic framework is a conservative extension.

def Phenomena.Iconicity.Studies.SchlenkerEtAl2026.travelingShotCondition {W : Type u_5} {T : Type u_6} {P : Type u_7} {E : Type u_8} (projects : ESemantics.Iconic.StaticViewpoint PBool) (d : E) (vp : Semantics.Iconic.DynamicViewpoint W T P) (w : W) :

The traveling shot condition: there exist two times at which the object's projection differs, producing apparent motion. This is only possible when the viewpoint is dynamic.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    A static viewpoint never produces a traveling shot: projection is constant across time, so no apparent motion is possible.

    def Phenomena.Iconicity.Studies.SchlenkerEtAl2026.ViewpointAssignment (W : Type u_5) (T : Type u_6) (P : Type u_7) :
    Type (max (max u_7 u_6) u_5)

    A viewpoint assignment: maps viewpoint variable indices to dynamic viewpoints. The iconic analogue of an assignment function for pronouns.

    Equations
    Instances For

      Resolve a viewpoint variable against a viewpoint assignment and an agent. Free variables read from the assignment; the context-bound variable π* reads the dynamic viewpoint associated with the agent.

      Under Role Shift (which changes the context's agent to the character), π* yields the character's dynamic viewpoint.

      Equations
      Instances For
        def Phenomena.Iconicity.Studies.SchlenkerEtAl2026.roleShiftCtx {W : Type u_1} {E : Type u_2} {P : Type u_3} {T : Type u_4} (character : E) (rsWorld : W) :

        Role Shift as context shift. Structurally identical to attitudeShift but labeled .roleShift — it changes the agent to the character (and the world to a Role-Shift-accessible world).

        The viewpoint consequence is indirect: since π* reads the agent's viewpoint via resolveViewpoint, changing the agent changes what π* denotes.

        Equations
        Instances For
          theorem Phenomena.Iconicity.Studies.SchlenkerEtAl2026.roleShift_is_monster {W : Type u_1} {E : Type u_2} {P : Type u_3} {T : Type u_4} (character : E) (rsWorld : W) (c : Core.Context.KContext W E P T) (hAgent : c.agent character) :

          Role Shift is a monster (non-identity context shift), connecting to the Kaplan/Schlenker monster debate in Monsters.lean.

          theorem Phenomena.Iconicity.Studies.SchlenkerEtAl2026.contextBound_under_roleShift {W : Type u_1} {E : Type u_2} {P : Type u_3} {T : Type u_4} (assign : ViewpointAssignment W T P) (agentVP : ESemantics.Iconic.DynamicViewpoint W T P) (character : E) :
          resolveViewpoint Semantics.Iconic.ViewpointVar.contextBound assign agentVP character = agentVP character

          Under Role Shift, π* resolves to the character's viewpoint.

          theorem Phenomena.Iconicity.Studies.SchlenkerEtAl2026.free_unaffected_by_agent {W : Type u_1} {E : Type u_2} {P : Type u_3} {T : Type u_4} (assign : ViewpointAssignment W T P) (agentVP : ESemantics.Iconic.DynamicViewpoint W T P) (agent₁ agent₂ : E) (i : ) :

          Free viewpoint variables are unaffected by who the agent is — they read from the assignment function regardless.

          The restrictive theory: free viewpoint variables always denote static viewpoints. Only context-bound π* (introduced by Role Shift) can be dynamic.

          Equations
          Instances For
            theorem Phenomena.Iconicity.Studies.SchlenkerEtAl2026.restrictive_no_travelingShot {W : Type u_1} {E : Type u_2} {P : Type u_3} {T : Type u_4} (assign : ViewpointAssignment W T P) (agentVP : ESemantics.Iconic.DynamicViewpoint W T P) (hRestr : RestrictiveTheory assign) (projects : ESemantics.Iconic.StaticViewpoint PBool) (d : E) (i : ) (agent : E) (w : W) :

            Under the restrictive theory, traveling shots are impossible for classifiers with free viewpoint variables.

            The complete argumentation chain:

            1. Role Shift changes the context's agent from signer to character
            2. π* reads the agent's viewpoint, so it now reads the character's
            3. The character's viewpoint is dynamic (they are moving)
            4. Dynamic viewpoint + static object → traveling shot is possible
            5. Static viewpoint would make traveling shot impossible

            This theorem captures steps 2-5: given that the character's viewpoint is genuinely dynamic (non-constant), the traveling shot condition is satisfiable — there exist times where projection differs.

            An acceptability judgment on a 7-point scale.

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                A paradigm condition: classifier direction + Role Shift status.

                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Paradigm (7): POLE-cl moving past signer. Ann driving drunk, nearly hits pole. Direction determines which side she nearly hits. No strict Role Shift (no body rotation).

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Paradigm (13): TREE-cl moving past signer. Ann runs past a tree. Direction determines which side the tree passes on. No strict Role Shift.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Paradigm (19): Role-shifted version of (7). Strict Role Shift (body rotation). Same interpretive effect.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Paradigm (7) instantiates the traveling shot: pole is static, classifier moves, motion type is relative.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Paradigm (13) instantiates the traveling shot: tree is static, classifier moves, motion type is relative.

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For