Italian Verb Entries @cite{fusco-sgrizzi-2026} #
Italian attitude and causative-attitude verbs, with emphasis on the di/a infinitival alternation documented in @cite{fusco-sgrizzi-2026}.
The di/a Alternation #
Italian convincere ('convince') selects two distinct infinitival complements:
- di + infinitive → CP-sized → CLOSURE applies → belief reading "Maria ha convinto Paolo di essere in pericolo" ('Maria convinced Paolo that he was in danger')
- a + infinitive → sub-CP (aP) → no CLOSURE → intention reading "Maria ha convinto Paolo a partire" ('Maria convinced Paolo to leave')
The complement marker (di vs a) tracks the complement's structural size, which determines the rational attitude reading.
Italian infinitival complementizers, each associated with a complement size.
- di: introduces CP-sized infinitival complements (propositional)
- a: introduces sub-CP (aP) infinitival complements (event predicate)
- che: introduces full finite CP complements
- di : InfComplementizer
- a_ : InfComplementizer
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The complement size selected by each Italian infinitival complementizer.
Equations
Instances For
The rational attitude reading derived from each complementizer.
Equations
Instances For
An Italian verb entry extending VerbCore with the infinitival
complementizer alternation.
- infComplements : List InfComplementizer
Which infinitival complementizers the verb selects
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
convincere 'convince' — causative attitude verb with dual infinitival selection. Takes di-infinitives (belief) and a-infinitives (intention).
@cite{fusco-sgrizzi-2026}, ex. (4):
- (4a) Marco ha convinto Gianni di avere un figlio (belief)
- (4b) Marco ha convinto Gianni a avere un figlio (intention)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
credere 'believe' — standard doxastic attitude verb. Takes di-infinitives and che-finite clauses (belief only).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
volere 'want' — core desiderative verb, robustly subjunctive-selecting.
@cite{grano-2024}, Table 1: Italian 'want' takes SBJV (marginally %IND).
- (4a) Gianni vuole che Maria sia/%è contenta. (SBJV preferred)
- (4b) Gianni vuole essere contento. (INF)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
sperare 'hope' — cross-linguistically variable mood selection.
@cite{grano-2024}, Table 1: Italian 'hope' takes SBJV, %IND marginal.
- (12) Gianni spera che Maria sia/%è contenta. (SBJV preferred) Unlike volere, sperare allows indicative marginally in Italian and freely in other Romance languages (French espérer, Portuguese esperar).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
intendere 'intend' — intention-reporting verb, robustly rejects indicative.
@cite{grano-2024}, §2.2: Italian 'intend' primarily uses the periphrastic avere intenzione di or the control verb intendere. Indicative complements are never accepted. The rare literary usage with subjunctive (ex. 30, from Treccani) has a 'demand'-like interpretation.
- (20) Intendo / Ho intenzione di andare al parco oggi. (INF only)
- (28) *Intendo che Giovanni vada/va al parco oggi. (rejected)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
fare 'make' — causative verb, robustly rejects indicative.
@cite{grano-2024}, §2.4: Italian causatives accept nonfinite and subjunctive (with sì che) but reject indicative complements.
- (39) Ho fatto andare Giovanni al parco. (INF)
- (42a) Ho fatto sì che Giovanni andasse/*è andato al parco. (SBJV/*IND)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
di-infinitives yield belief readings.
a-infinitives yield intention readings.
convincere supports both readings (one per complementizer).
credere supports only the belief reading.
The di/a alternation in convincere is structurally grounded: the two complementizers select different complement sizes, which deterministically map to different attitude readings.
volere has Levin want-class (core desiderative).
sperare does NOT have Levin want-class (explains mood variation).
intendere has Levin want-class (patterns with volere on mood).
volere and intendere share want-class; sperare does not. This predicts the mood choice asymmetry: volere/intendere robustly reject indicative, while sperare varies (@cite{grano-2024}, Table 1).