Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Italian.Predicates

Italian Verb Entries @cite{fusco-sgrizzi-2026} #

Italian attitude and causative-attitude verbs, with emphasis on the di/a infinitival alternation documented in @cite{fusco-sgrizzi-2026}.

The di/a Alternation #

Italian convincere ('convince') selects two distinct infinitival complements:

The complement marker (di vs a) tracks the complement's structural size, which determines the rational attitude reading.

Italian infinitival complementizers, each associated with a complement size.

  • di: introduces CP-sized infinitival complements (propositional)
  • a: introduces sub-CP (aP) infinitival complements (event predicate)
  • che: introduces full finite CP complements
Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      An Italian verb entry extending VerbCore with the infinitival complementizer alternation.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          Instances For

            convincere 'convince' — causative attitude verb with dual infinitival selection. Takes di-infinitives (belief) and a-infinitives (intention).

            @cite{fusco-sgrizzi-2026}, ex. (4):

            • (4a) Marco ha convinto Gianni di avere un figlio (belief)
            • (4b) Marco ha convinto Gianni a avere un figlio (intention)
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              credere 'believe' — standard doxastic attitude verb. Takes di-infinitives and che-finite clauses (belief only).

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                volere 'want' — core desiderative verb, robustly subjunctive-selecting.

                @cite{grano-2024}, Table 1: Italian 'want' takes SBJV (marginally %IND).

                • (4a) Gianni vuole che Maria sia/%è contenta. (SBJV preferred)
                • (4b) Gianni vuole essere contento. (INF)
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  sperare 'hope' — cross-linguistically variable mood selection.

                  @cite{grano-2024}, Table 1: Italian 'hope' takes SBJV, %IND marginal.

                  • (12) Gianni spera che Maria sia/%è contenta. (SBJV preferred) Unlike volere, sperare allows indicative marginally in Italian and freely in other Romance languages (French espérer, Portuguese esperar).
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    intendere 'intend' — intention-reporting verb, robustly rejects indicative.

                    @cite{grano-2024}, §2.2: Italian 'intend' primarily uses the periphrastic avere intenzione di or the control verb intendere. Indicative complements are never accepted. The rare literary usage with subjunctive (ex. 30, from Treccani) has a 'demand'-like interpretation.

                    • (20) Intendo / Ho intenzione di andare al parco oggi. (INF only)
                    • (28) *Intendo che Giovanni vada/va al parco oggi. (rejected)
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      fare 'make' — causative verb, robustly rejects indicative.

                      @cite{grano-2024}, §2.4: Italian causatives accept nonfinite and subjunctive (with sì che) but reject indicative complements.

                      • (39) Ho fatto andare Giovanni al parco. (INF)
                      • (42a) Ho fatto sì che Giovanni andasse/*è andato al parco. (SBJV/*IND)
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        The di/a alternation in convincere is structurally grounded: the two complementizers select different complement sizes, which deterministically map to different attitude readings.

                        volere has Levin want-class (core desiderative).

                        sperare does NOT have Levin want-class (explains mood variation).

                        intendere has Levin want-class (patterns with volere on mood).

                        volere and intendere share want-class; sperare does not. This predicts the mood choice asymmetry: volere/intendere robustly reject indicative, while sperare varies (@cite{grano-2024}, Table 1).