Documentation

Linglib.Core.Lexical.RootFeatures

Root Quality Dimensions and Structural Entailments #

@cite{talmy-1988} @cite{talmy-2000} @cite{dowty-1991} @cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020} @cite{majid-boster-bowerman-2008}

Framework-agnostic infrastructure for characterizing verb root content. Roots are regions, not points: each dimension is a Range of acceptable values, reflecting that verbs are compatible with a range of event types.

Quality dimensions (§§ 1–2) #

Range-valued dimensions capturing within-class variation: force magnitude, force direction, patient robustness, result type, instrument type, object dimensionality, agent volition, agent control.

Root structural entailments (§ 3) #

From @cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020}: binary features capturing what the root itself entails about event structure (state, manner, result, cause).

Root structural position (§ 4) #

From Marantz (2009) and @cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020}: whether the root merges as complement or adjunct of v.

@[reducible, inline]
abbrev Range (α : Type) :

Acceptable values along a quality dimension.

  • none: the root is unconstrained on this dimension (says nothing)
  • some [v₁, v₂, …]: the root is compatible with exactly these values

Roots are regions, not points: a verb like tear is compatible with a range of force levels, not a single one.

Equations
Instances For
    Equations
    Instances For
      def Range.only {α : Type} (vs : List α) :
      Equations
      Instances For
        def Range.isCompatible {α : Type} [BEq α] :
        Range ααBool
        Equations
        Instances For
          def Range.overlaps {α : Type} [BEq α] :
          Range αRange αBool

          Two ranges overlap if they share at least one value.

          Equations
          Instances For
            inductive ForceLevel :

            Magnitude of force involved in the event.

            @cite{talmy-1988} identifies force magnitude as a core parameter of force-dynamic schemas. @cite{spalek-mcnally-2026}: tear implies considerable force; rasgar implies less (enough to damage something flimsy).

            Instances For
              Equations
              Equations
              Instances For
                inductive ForceDirection :

                Spatial pattern of force application.

                @cite{talmy-2000}: force vectors have directional parameters. @cite{spalek-mcnally-2026}: tear implies contrary-direction force (pulling apart); rasgar implies unidirectional force (gash-like).

                Instances For
                  Equations
                  Instances For
                    inductive Robustness :

                    Material substantiality of the affected entity (patient).

                    @cite{spalek-mcnally-2026}: the primary dimension distinguishing tear (unrestricted) from rasgar (flimsy patients only).

                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      Equations
                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        Instances For
                          inductive ResultType :

                          Nature of the physical change produced by the event.

                          Grounded in @cite{levin-1993}'s class descriptions and @cite{hale-keyser-1987} notion of "separation in material integrity":

                          • 45.1 Break: loss of material integrity (break, crack, shatter, tear)
                          • 45.2 Bend: change in shape without loss of integrity
                          • 44 Destroy: total destruction (no specific resulting state)
                          • 21 Cut: separation via instrument contact Refined by @cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020} on CoS root types.
                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            Equations
                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              Instances For
                                inductive InstrumentType :

                                Type of instrument used in the event.

                                @cite{majid-boster-bowerman-2008}: instrument type interacts with object properties to determine the predictability of separation locus (their Dimension 1). Sharp instruments yield predictable separations; blunt instruments and hands yield unpredictable separations.

                                @cite{levin-1993}: cut verbs (§21) specify their instrument (instrumentSpec = true); break verbs (§45.1) do not.

                                Instances For

                                  Dimensionality of the affected object (patient).

                                  @cite{majid-boster-bowerman-2008}: object dimensionality interacts with instrument type and manner of action to determine event categorization cross-linguistically. 1D objects (rope, stick) can be snapped; 2D objects (cloth, paper) can be torn; 3D objects (melon, pot) can be smashed.

                                  Instances For
                                    Equations
                                    Instances For
                                      inductive Volitionality :

                                      Whether the agent acts with volitional intent.

                                      @cite{dowty-1991}: Proto-Agent entailment P1 = "volitional involvement in the event or state." @cite{ausensi-yu-smith-2021}: killing verb roots impose specific intentionality requirements on the agent (murder requires intentional agent; kill does not). @cite{levin-1993}: some break verbs "allow unintentional, action interpretations with body-part objects."

                                      Instances For
                                        inductive AgentControl :

                                        Whether the action can be performed with care and control.

                                        @cite{dowty-1991}: Proto-Agent entailment P2 = "sentience (and/or perception)," enabling controlled action. @cite{spalek-mcnally-2026}: tear is compatible with careful action ("carefully tore the tin foil"); rasgar is not ("??rasgaron con cuidado el papel").

                                        Instances For
                                          structure RootProfile :

                                          Within-class root content profile.

                                          Captures quality dimensions of root content — force, robustness, agent properties — as opposed to RootEntailments (§ 3b), which captures structural entailments (state, manner, result, cause).

                                          Each dimension is a Range of acceptable values; none means the root says nothing about that dimension (unconstrained).

                                          Together with MeaningComponents (which defines the class), LevinClass (which identifies the class), and RootEntailments (which captures structural entailments), this gives a four-level characterization of a verb's semantic content:

                                          1. Class-defining meaning components (binary, from alternations)
                                          2. Class membership (Levin taxonomy)
                                          3. Root structural entailments (B&@cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020})
                                          4. Root-specific quality features (ranges, from detailed lexical analysis)
                                          • forceMag : Range ForceLevel

                                            Force magnitude: @cite{talmy-1988}.

                                          • Force directionality: @cite{talmy-2000}, @cite{spalek-mcnally-2026}.

                                          • patientRob : Range Robustness

                                            Patient material robustness: @cite{spalek-mcnally-2026}.

                                          • resultType : Range ResultType

                                            Type of physical change: @cite{levin-1993}, @cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020}.

                                          • agentVolition : Range Volitionality

                                            Agent volitionality: @cite{dowty-1991} P1, @cite{ausensi-yu-smith-2021}.

                                          • agentControl : Range AgentControl

                                            Agent control: @cite{dowty-1991} P2, @cite{spalek-mcnally-2026}.

                                          • instrumentType : Range InstrumentType

                                            Instrument type the root selects for: @cite{majid-boster-bowerman-2008}. cut selects for sharp blades; break is unspecified.

                                          • Patient dimensionality: @cite{majid-boster-bowerman-2008}. tear selects for 2D objects (cloth, paper); snap for 1D (stick, twig).

                                          Instances For
                                            Equations
                                            Instances For
                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For
                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For

                                                  Root-level structural entailments from @cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020}.

                                                  B&KG argue against Bifurcation (roots only contribute idiosyncratic content) and Manner/Result Complementarity (no root encodes both). Roots CAN entail states, change, and causation — notions traditionally reserved for templates (CAUSE, BECOME).

                                                  The four features define a root typology (Table 12, p. 228):

                                                  • state: root describes a state (√FLAT, √CRACK, √DRY)
                                                  • manner: root describes an action/manner (√JOG, √RUN, √HIT)
                                                  • result: root entails change — passes restitutive again test
                                                  • cause: root entails causation

                                                  Constraints: resultstate and causeresult (see wellFormed).

                                                  @cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020}

                                                  Instances For
                                                    Equations
                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                    Instances For
                                                      Equations
                                                      Instances For
                                                        Equations
                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                        Instances For

                                                          If a root entails change (result), it entails a state that changes. B&@cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020}: result entailments presuppose state entailments.

                                                          Equations
                                                          Instances For

                                                            If a root entails causation, it entails what is caused (a result). B&@cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020}: cause entailments presuppose result entailments.

                                                            Equations
                                                            Instances For

                                                              Well-formedness: both collocational constraints hold.

                                                              Equations
                                                              Instances For

                                                                Canonical root types (B&KG Table 12) #

                                                                +S −M −R −C: property concept roots (√FLAT, √DRY). Deadjectival COS verbs — the root names the result state. Table 12, row 1, complement position.

                                                                Equations
                                                                Instances For

                                                                  +S −M +R −C: internally caused result roots (√BLOSSOM, √RUST). Root entails both a state and a change to that state, but not external causation. Table 12, row 2, complement position.

                                                                  Equations
                                                                  Instances For

                                                                    +S −M +R +C: externally caused result roots (√CRACK, √BREAK). Root entails a state, change, AND causation — the root inherently implies an external cause. Table 12, row 3, complement position. B&KG (p. 228): these "lexicalize crosslinguistically as basic causatives" unlike √BLOSSOM-type roots.

                                                                    Equations
                                                                    Instances For

                                                                      −S +M −R −C: pure manner roots (√JOG, √RUN, √SWIM). Root specifies action manner without entailing any state. Table 12, row 4, adjoined position.

                                                                      Equations
                                                                      Instances For

                                                                        +S +M +R −C: manner + result without cause. Well-formed per the constraints but UNATTESTED in B&KG's Table 12 (row 6 is empty in both positions). B&KG (p. 229): such roots "would essentially derive syntactically unergative verbs with pure change-of-state meanings." Defined for completeness.

                                                                        Equations
                                                                        Instances For

                                                                          +S +M +R +C: fully specified roots (√HAND, √DROWN, √CUT). B&KG Ch. 3–4: manner + caused change. These are the attested MRC violators. Table 12, row 7. √HAND sits in adjoined position, √DROWN in complement position; this structural difference is not captured here.

                                                                          Equations
                                                                          Instances For

                                                                            −S −M −R −C: minimal roots — no structural entailments. Conservative default for classes not yet studied under B&KG's framework. Not a row in Table 12 (which only lists roots with at least one positive feature).

                                                                            Equations
                                                                            Instances For

                                                                              Canonical type well-formedness #

                                                                              MRC violation detection #

                                                                              Does this root violate Manner/Result Complementarity? B&KG Ch. 4: some roots encode both manner and result.

                                                                              Equations
                                                                              Instances For
                                                                                inductive RootPosition :

                                                                                Structural attachment position of a verb root, following Marantz (2009a;b, 2013) as systematized by @cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020} Table 12.

                                                                                • Complement: root merges as complement of v (inside VP). Fills the result-state slot. Change-of-state roots: √FLAT, √CRACK, √BLOSSOM, √DROWN.
                                                                                • Adjoined: root merges as adjunct to v (outside VP). Modifies the causing event. Manner/activity roots: √JOG, √TOSS, √HAND.

                                                                                This distinction is structurally significant beyond root typology: it determines vVPE eligibility (@cite{kalyakin-2026}), scope of result-state modifiers, and the restitutive/repetitive again ambiguity (@cite{beavers-koontz-garboden-2020}, @cite{merchant-2013}).

                                                                                Instances For

                                                                                  Does a root profile constrain patient properties?

                                                                                  Equations
                                                                                  Instances For

                                                                                    Do two root profiles overlap (share at least one compatible event)?

                                                                                    Equations
                                                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                    Instances For