Entailment Profiles and the Argument Selection Principle #
@cite{dowty-1991} @cite{davis-koenig-2000} @cite{grimm-2011} @cite{levin-2019} @cite{beavers-2010}
Entailment profiles encode the lexical entailments a verb imposes on each of its arguments, reflecting the modern consensus on proto-roles (@cite{levin-2019}). Proto-Agent and Proto-Patient are cluster concepts: each is a set of entailments, and an argument's "degree of agenthood/patienthood" is determined by which entailments it satisfies.
Entailment structure #
The 10 entailments are not fully independent (@cite{levin-2019} §2.1):
- P-Agent pairing: three P-Agent entailments are paired with P-Patient entailments in asymmetric relations (causation↔changeOfState, movement↔stationary, independentExistence↔dependentExistence).
- P-Agent dependency: volition presupposes sentience.
- P-Agent priority: causation outranks other P-Agent entailments for subject selection (@cite{davis-koenig-2000}).
- P-Patient implicational structure: the affectedness-related entailments (changeOfState, incrementalTheme, causallyAffected) form an implicational hierarchy (@cite{beavers-2010}).
These dependencies are exploited by the modern ASP (lattice comparison, §3–4)
and formalized algebraically in AgentivityLattice.lean:
- P-Agent →
AgentivityNode(4 privative features on a lattice; @cite{grimm-2011}) - P-Patient →
PersistenceLevel(4 persistence dimensions; @cite{grimm-2011}), andAffectednessDegree(implicational hierarchy of truth-conditional strength; @cite{beavers-2010})
Argument Selection Principle (lattice-based) #
The ASP uses lattice comparison (@cite{grimm-2011}): argument A outranks argument B for subjecthood iff A's P-Agent feature set dominates (is a superset of) B's. When P-Agent features are incomparable, P-Patient features break the tie. This naturally handles priority because feature-set inclusion respects the entailment dependencies.
For unaccusativity, the priority-based approach checks whether the sole argument has core agentive features (volition/causation) rather than flat-counting.
@cite{dowty-1991}'s original flat-counting ASP is preserved in
Phenomena/ArgumentStructure/Studies/Dowty1991.lean for comparison.
The 10 entailments defining Proto-Agent and Proto-Patient (@cite{dowty-1991} pp.572–573).
Proto-Agent entailments (a)–(e):
- volition, sentience, causation, movement, independent existence
Proto-Patient entailments (a)–(e):
- change of state, incremental theme, causally affected, stationary, dependent existence
- volition : Bool
(a) volitional involvement in the event
- sentience : Bool
(b) sentience/perception
- causation : Bool
(c) causing an event or change of state in another participant
- movement : Bool
(d) movement (relative to another participant)
- independentExistence : Bool
(e) exists independently of the event named by the verb
- changeOfState : Bool
(a) undergoes change of state
- incrementalTheme : Bool
(b) incremental theme (Krifka's SINC)
- causallyAffected : Bool
(c) causally affected by another participant
- stationary : Bool
(d) stationary relative to another participant
- dependentExistence : Bool
(e) does not exist independently of the event
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Semantics.Lexical.Verb.EntailmentProfile.instBEqEntailmentProfile.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Count of Proto-Agent entailments. Informational — the modern ASP uses lattice comparison, not counting. Retained for bridge theorems and backward compatibility with study files.
Equations
Instances For
Count of Proto-Patient entailments.
Equations
Instances For
P-Agent feature dominance: p has every P-Agent feature that q has.
This is the subset ordering on P-Agent feature sets.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
P-Patient feature dominance: p has every P-Patient feature that q has.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Strict P-Agent dominance: p dominates q but not vice versa.
Means p has a strict superset of q's P-Agent features.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Strict P-Patient dominance.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Modern ASP: subj outranks obj for subjecthood iff:
(1) subj strictly dominates obj on P-Agent features
(subj's P-Agent set ⊃ obj's P-Agent set), OR
(2) Neither strictly dominates the other on P-Agent, AND obj
strictly dominates subj on P-Patient (obj is a "better"
object, hence subj wins by exclusion).
This replaces @cite{dowty-1991}'s flat counting with lattice comparison (@cite{grimm-2011}, @cite{davis-koenig-2000}). Priority of causation is captured structurally: {causation, IE} ⊃ {IE} but {causation, IE} ⊥ {sentience, IE} (incomparable).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Corollary 1 (@cite{dowty-1991} p.579): Neither argument outranks the other → alternation is possible (buy/sell, like/please).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Predicts unaccusativity for intransitive verbs.
An intransitive subject is unaccusative iff it lacks core agentive
features (volition AND causation) and has at least one P-Patient
feature. This matches @cite{dowty-1991}'s Table 1 cell 4 and fixes
the arrive anomaly that flat counting gets wrong.
@cite{davis-koenig-2000}: causation and volition are the priority P-Agent entailments. Their absence signals non-agentivity.
Equations
Instances For
Predicts unergative for intransitive verbs.
An intransitive subject is unergative iff it has at least one core agentive feature (volition or causation) and no P-Patient features.
Equations
Instances For
Intra-profile well-formedness: volition presupposes sentience. Only sentient entities can be volitional (@cite{dowty-1991} p.607, @cite{levin-2019} §2.1).
Instances For
Inter-argument well-formedness (@cite{davis-koenig-2000}, @cite{primus-1999}): three P-Agent entailments are paired with P-Patient entailments in asymmetric relations.
- causation (subject) → changeOfState (object)
- movement (subject) → stationary (object)
- independentExistence (subject) → dependentExistence (object)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The do-test passes (semantically) iff at least one of {volition, causation, movement} holds.
Equations
Instances For
Passing the do-test is equivalent to having at least one P-Agent entailment from {volition, causation, movement}.
An effector (@cite{van-valin-wilkins-1996}) is a self-energetic force bearer: movement + independent existence. Realized as external argument.
Equations
Instances For
A force recipient is causally affected or stationary. Realized as internal argument.
Equations
Instances For
Effectors have at least 2 P-Agent entailments (movement + IE).
"kick" subject: V+S+C+M+IE (prototypical agent, 5 P-Ag)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"kick" object: CoS+CA+St (3 P-Pat)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"build" subject: V+S+C+M+IE (5 P-Ag)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"build" object: CoS+IT+CA+DE (4 P-Pat, incremental theme, dependent existence)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"see" subject: S+IE (experiencer, 2 P-Ag)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"run" subject: V+S+M+IE (4 P-Ag, unergative)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"arrive" subject: M+IE+CoS (2 P-Ag, 1 P-Pat — unaccusative)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"die" subject: CoS+CA+DE (0 P-Ag, 3 P-Pat — unaccusative)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"eat" subject: V+S+C+M+IE (5 P-Ag)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"eat" object: CoS+IT+CA (3 P-Pat, incremental theme)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"buy" subject: V+S+C+IE (4 P-Ag)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"sell" subject: V+S+C+IE (same as buy — 4 P-Ag)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"sweep" basic-sense subject: M+IE (movement + independent existence). Underspecified for volition — agentivity is pragmatically resolved.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"sweep" broom-sense subject: V+S+C+M+IE (obligatory agent, 5 P-Ag). Instrument lexicalization forces volition, sentience, causation.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.