Smuggling @cite{collins-2005} #
@cite{collins-2005} defines smuggling as follows:
Suppose a constituent YP contains XP. Furthermore, suppose XP is inaccessible to Z because of the presence of W (a barrier, phase boundary, or intervener for the MLC / Relativized Minimality (@cite{rizzi-1990})). If YP moves to a position c-commanding W, we say that YP smuggles XP past W.
The canonical application is passive: PartP (containing the object) moves to Spec-VoiceP, smuggling the object past the external argument in Spec-vP. The object can then raise to Spec-TP without violating Relativized Minimality (@cite{rizzi-1990}), because the intervening external argument no longer c-commands it.
@cite{storment-2026} extends this to quotative inversion (QI): VP moves to Spec-VoiceP, making the theme subject accessible to T⁰ for Case licensing. The quote is clause-external (adjoined high). This yields surface order "Quote" V Subject.
Key Insight: Phase Permeability #
Smuggling requires the complement of Voice to remain accessible for extraction. Agentive Voice (v*) is a phase head; its complement is frozen by PIC once the phase is complete. Non-thematic Voice (anticausative) is NOT a phase head, so its complement remains accessible.
This connects to the existing VoiceHead.phaseHead field:
voiceAgent.phaseHead = true→ vP is a phase → complement frozen → no smugglingvoiceAnticausative.phaseHead = false→ vP is not a phase → complement extractab@cite{collins-2005} makes the same point: "neither the moved PartP nor an unaccusative vP are strong phases."
Whether a Voice head permits complement extraction (smuggling).
Smuggling requires the complement of Voice to remain accessible. Phase heads freeze their complement (PIC), so smuggling is available only with non-phase Voice. This is the structural precondition for quotative inversion, passivization-via-smuggling, and related complement-fronting operations.
Derived from phaseHead: this is not a new primitive but a
direct consequence of phase theory applied to Voice.
Equations
Instances For
Agentive Voice blocks smuggling (v* is a phase head).
Non-thematic Voice permits smuggling (not a phase head). This is why anticausative / unaccusative verbs allow complement fronting (@cite{storment-2026}: quotative inversion; @cite{collins-2005}: passive).
Causer Voice blocks smuggling (phase head, like agentive).
Expletive (middle) Voice permits smuggling (not a phase head).
Impersonal Voice permits smuggling (not a phase head). Finnish impersonal "passive" is structurally similar to anticausative.
Smuggling availability is the exact complement of phasehood.
θ-assigning Voice blocks smuggling. Agentive and causer Voice are both θ-assigners and phase heads, so they block complement extraction.
Non-θ Voice with phaseHead = false permits smuggling.
This covers the canonical unaccusative case.
A verb licenses quotative inversion iff: (1) its Voice head permits smuggling (non-phase vP), and (2) it has a complement to smuggle (the quote).
This captures @cite{storment-2026}'s two conditions:
- Unaccusativity (non-thematic Voice → non-phase → smuggling available)
- Quote complement (something to front)
hasComplement corresponds to ComplementType ≠.none at the
VerbEntry level; the bridge in ArgumentStructure/Studies/Storment2026.lean verifies
this against the English fragment.
Equations
- Minimalism.licensesQI voice hasComplement = (voice.permitsSmuggling && hasComplement)
Instances For
QI requires both conditions: smuggling + complement.
Agentive Voice blocks QI regardless of complement availability. This is why *"spoke Mary" is ungrammatical even though speak is a manner-of-speaking verb — agentive Voice makes vP a phase.
Non-thematic Voice with a complement licenses QI. This is why "'I'm tired,' whispered Mary" is grammatical — whisper projects non-thematic Voice (theme subject), and the quote is the complement.
Non-thematic Voice without complement does NOT license QI. Bare unaccusative use ("Mary arrived") has no quote to smuggle.
A Voice head licenses passive smuggling iff: (1) its vP is not a phase (complement remains accessible), and (2) there is a PartP (participial phrase) to smuggle.
@cite{collins-2005}: PartP (= [Part V DP_object]) is complement of v. In passive, PartP moves to Spec-VoiceP, smuggling the object DP past the external argument in Spec-vP. The object can then raise to Spec-TP without violating Relativized Minimality (@cite{rizzi-1990}).
The structural parallel with QI is exact:
- QI: VP smuggles theme past agent
- Passive: PartP smuggles object past external argument
@cite{collins-2005}: passive v is not v* — it assigns θ but does not check Case (dissociated onto Voice/by). Without Case-checking, v is not a strong phase head, so PartP is extractable.
Equations
- Minimalism.licensesPassiveSmuggling voice hasPartP = (voice.permitsSmuggling && hasPartP)
Instances For
Passive smuggling requires both conditions.
Passive Voice licenses smuggling when PartP is present. This is the canonical passive derivation from @cite{collins-2005}.
Agentive Voice blocks passive smuggling — v* is a phase head, so PartP is frozen by PIC. Active transitives do not undergo smuggling: the object gets Case from v directly.
Passive Voice checks Case but does not assign θ (feature dissociation). This is what makes passive v defective (non-phase): Case-checking is the property that distinguishes v* from v (@cite{chomsky-2001}, @cite{collins-2005} p. 96).