Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Syntax.Minimalism.HeadMovement.GermanicV2

Part 1: The Lexicon #

We define the lexical items for the German sentence from @cite{harizanov-gribanova-2019}.

Diesen Film haben die Kinder gesehen.
this film have the children seen

The COMPLEX finite verb "haben" (have): both V and C features @cite{harizanov-gribanova-2019}

Following Harizanov (Section 5.2), V2 verbs are categorially complex:

  • V-component projects in base position
  • C-component projects in derived position
Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    Part 2: Structure #

            CP
           / \
        haben TP
              / \
        die Kinder T'
                   / \
                  T VP
                      / \
                  haben diesen Film
    

    DP "diesen Film" (this film) = {D, N}

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      DP "die Kinder" (the children) = {D, N}

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Part 3: Movement Structure #

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Part 4: Head-to-Head Properties #

          The verb stays MINIMAL (a head) at C. It reprojects its C-features. This is the defining property of head-to-head movement.

          Part 5: The Key Claim — T Intervenes #

          This is the existence proof: we show T is between V and C, so V2 violates the HMC.

          T ≠ TP (T is a leaf, TP is a node)

          Part 6: Main Results #

          MAIN THEOREM: T intervenes between V and C in V2

          This establishes the structural condition for HMC violation. V moves to C, but T is between V's base position and C.

          From Harizanov (p.35-36): "verb raises directly to its final landing site, moving across any and all intervening functional heads"

          V2 is head-to-head movement (mover stays minimal)

          Unlike head-to-specifier where the mover becomes maximal, in head-to-head the mover reprojects and stays a head.

          Appendix: Summary of Harizanov's Typology #

          Head-to-specifier (e.g., Bulgarian LHM):

          Head-to-head (e.g., Germanic V2):

          Amalgamation (e.g., French V-to-T):