Classification of Merge into Three Combination Schemata #
@cite{mueller-2013}
Explicit classification of Minimalist Merge operations into @cite{mueller-2013}'s three universal combination schemata: Head-Complement, Head-Specifier, Head-Filler.
The existing MergeUnification.lean proves that Internal and External Merge
are the same operation. This file further classifies Merge by combination kind:
| Merge type | Precondition | Schema |
|---|---|---|
| External (selection holds) | selectsB a b | Head-Complement |
| External (specifier) | neither selects, arg is maximal | Head-Specifier |
| Internal | contains target mover | Head-Filler |
Connection to @cite{mueller-2013} #
- §2.1: External Merge with selection ≈ Head-Complement
- §2.2: External Merge without selection ≈ Head-Specifier
- §2.3: Internal Merge ≈ Head-Filler
Classification of Merge #
Classify an External Merge (known to have no containment).
Equations
Instances For
Classify an Internal Merge (known to have containment).
Instances For
Which daughter is the head? #
Determine which daughter is the head of a Merge.
The head is the daughter whose label matches the result's label. In Minimalism, this is determined by which element projects.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Key theorems #
External Merge with selection is Head-Complement.
When one SO selects the other (first merge consuming a selectional feature), this is the Head-Complement schema: the selector is the head, the selectee is the complement.
External Merge without selection is Head-Specifier.
When neither SO selects the other (e.g., subject merging with TP), this is the Head-Specifier schema.
Internal Merge is always Head-Filler.
Movement (re-merge of a contained element) is always the Head-Filler schema, regardless of what the mover or target looks like.
The classification is exhaustive: every External Merge is either Head-Complement or Head-Specifier.
Label = Head Feature Principle: when α selects β, the label of {α, β} = label α.
This is the Minimalist analogue of the Head Feature Principle: the selector projects, so the result's label equals the selector's label.
Monovalent Verb Serialization Problem (@cite{mueller-2013} §2.3) #
In Stabler's non-directional MG, a monovalent verb's only argument is classified as a complement (Head-Complement, since the verb selects it). Left-to-right linearization places the complement after the head, yielding "*Sleeps Max" instead of "Max sleeps".
Stabler's fix — positing an ad hoc empty object — is "entirely stipulative and entirely ad hoc, being motivated only by the wish to have uniform structures" (Müller, p. 937).
"sleeps" — a monovalent verb (category V, selects D).
Equations
- Minimalism.sleepsToken = { item := Minimalism.LexicalItem.simple Minimalism.Cat.V [Minimalism.Cat.D] "sleeps", id := 200 }
Instances For
"Max" — a proper name (category D, no selectional features).
Equations
- Minimalism.maxToken = { item := Minimalism.LexicalItem.simple Minimalism.Cat.D [] "Max", id := 201 }
Instances For
Merge classifies the sole argument as a complement (the verb selects it).
Left-to-right linearization of merge(sleeps, Max) gives "sleeps Max". This is the wrong order for English — it should be "Max sleeps".
The desired order differs from the linearization.