Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Semantics.Causation.MorphologicalCausation

Morphological Causation: Causative Construction Typology #

@cite{comrie-1989} @cite{song-1996} @cite{krejci-2012}

Causative constructions cross-linguistically vary along two orthogonal axes: morphological complexity (compact → analytic) and semantic directness (direct → indirect mediation). @cite{comrie-1989}'s central generalization: more complex morphology correlates with more indirect causation.

Causer Type #

Causative constructions are sensitive to the causer's intentionality and ontological category. Following @cite{hafeez-2025}, we distinguish:

The key dimension is intentionality, not ontological type: IHCr and AHCr are both human but differ in agentivity. This three-way distinction drives construction selection in Urdu and other languages.

Causee/Affectee Type #

The second participant in a causal chain (causee or affectee) varies in four levels of control and animacy, following @cite{hafeez-2025}:

Agentivity #

Agentivity decomposes into intentionality × control (following @cite{van-valin-wilkins-1996}). Three degrees:

Bridges #

Intransitivization (@cite{krejci-2012}) #

The causative/inchoative alternation has two directions: causativization (adding an external cause) and intransitivization (removing or coidentifying it). @cite{krejci-2012}'s central insight: intransitive variants are NOT structurally uniform. Reflexive intransitives (German sich, Hindi apne-aap) coidentify causer and causee, retaining bieventive structure. Anticausative intransitives remove the external cause entirely, yielding monoeventive structure.

Causer type distinguished by intentionality and ontological category.

The key dimension is intentionality: IHCr and AHCr are both human but have fundamentally different agentivity profiles. NFCr is non-human and non-intentional.

This three-way distinction drives construction selection in Urdu (@cite{hafeez-2025}) and other languages.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Causee/affectee type: four levels of control and animacy.

      @cite{hafeez-2025}'s four-way distinction captures the gradient of the second participant's autonomy in a causal chain. A controlling causee reduces the causer's responsibility; an inanimate affectee increases it.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Degree of agentivity, decomposed from intentionality × control.

          @cite{hafeez-2025}: "an intentional causer displays full agentivity, an accidental causer shows reduced or marginal agentivity, and a causee/affectee who exerts control displays induced or partial agentivity."

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Directness of causal mediation between causer and result.

              @cite{comrie-1989}: direct causation involves no intermediary — the causer brings about the result without an intervening causee decision or action. Indirect causation involves a mediating causee who retains some autonomy over the caused event.

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Morphological complexity of a causative construction.

                  @cite{comrie-1989}'s compact-to-analytic continuum:

                  • lexical: suppletive or idiosyncratic (kill/die, fell/fall)
                  • morphological: productive affix (Urdu -aa, Japanese -(s)ase)
                  • periphrastic: analytic multi-word (English "make X do Y")

                  Ordered from compact to analytic.

                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                      A causative construction bundles morphological complexity with semantic parameters that govern its use.

                      Each language's causative system is a list of CausativeConstruction values — e.g., Urdu has 7 (acceptability study), Japanese has 3.

                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            A semantic prototype specifies the combination of semantic variables under which a construction receives its peak acceptability rating or is preferentially produced.

                            @cite{hafeez-2025} Table 25: each construction has a (possibly empty) set of features that define its prototype. A prototype is "hypothesized" when the acceptability peak exceeds 50% ceiling for a scene type.

                            Prototypes use both positive (e.g., [+IHCr]) and negative (e.g., [-IHCr]) feature specifications. Both are represented as lists: presentCausers/absentCausers etc.

                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Comrie's monotonicity (@cite{comrie-1989} §8.4): within a single language, if construction A is morphologically more compact than construction B, then A encodes more direct causation than B.

                                  Stated as a predicate on pairs: a system satisfies Comrie's generalization when complexity and mediation co-vary.

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    Intentional human causers map to the agentive pole of the lattice (volition + sentience + instigation); accidental humans retain sentience but lack volition; natural forces have instigation only.

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      Natural force causers have only instigation (no sentience, no volition).

                                      Controlling causees have induced agentivity; all other causee types do not.

                                      How an alternating verb forms its intransitive variant.

                                      @cite{krejci-2012}'s central insight: intransitive variants of causative/inchoative alternation verbs are NOT structurally uniform. Two distinct operations produce surface intransitives:

                                      • anticausative: the external cause is removed entirely. The result is monoeventive: [BECOME [x STATE]]. No causer position exists.
                                      • reflexive: the causer and causee are coidentified — a single participant fills both roles. The result is bieventive: [x ACT] CAUSE [BECOME [x STATE]] with causer = causee. Morphologically marked: German sich, Marathi -un.
                                      • unmarked: no morphological distinction (English break). Event structure must be diagnosed per-verb.
                                      Instances For
                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          Reflexive intransitives retain the causer position (coidentified with the causee), preserving bieventive structure. Anticausatives remove the causer entirely, yielding monoeventive structure.

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            "By itself" (von selbst, apne-aap, aapo-aap) is licensed when a causer position exists, even if coidentified with the causee. Anticausatives lack a causer position entirely.

                                            English unmarked intransitives also license "by itself" ("The door opened by itself"), because the unmarked form can be either reflexive or anticausative — only true anticausatives block the modifier.

                                            Equations
                                            Instances For

                                              Coidentification implies bieventivity (the causer position preserved by coidentification is what makes the structure bieventive).

                                              Bieventivity implies "by itself" licensing (both track the presence of a causer position).

                                              @cite{krejci-2012} proposes a cross-linguistic hierarchy of causativizability — the extent to which a morphological causative morpheme can apply to different verb classes:

                                                  unaccusatives > middles/ingestives > unergatives > simple transitives
                                              
                                              The hierarchy is implicational: if a morpheme causativizes a
                                              higher verb class, it also causativizes all lower classes. This
                                              is validated across 12 languages in @cite{krejci-2012} Table 2.8. 
                                              

                                              Cross-linguistic data on causativizability: which verb classes a given morphological causative morpheme can apply to.

                                              Instances For
                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For

                                                  The hierarchy is implicational: each level implies all lower levels. simpleTransitive → unergative → middlesIngestive → unaccusative.

                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For

                                                    Cross-linguistic causativizability data from @cite{krejci-2012} Table 2.8. Languages are ordered from narrowest to broadest causative scope.

                                                    Equations
                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                    Instances For