Then-Present Puzzle (@cite{zhao-2025}) #
@cite{zhao-2025} @cite{kiparsky-2002}
Temporal ⌈then⌉ is cross-linguistically incompatible with present tense.
The puzzle #
⌈then⌉ presupposes ¬(g(n) ○ π): its reference is disjoint from the temporal perspective. PRES presupposes g(n) ○ π: overlap with the perspective. When composition forces the PRES reference inside the then reference ("during then"), the presuppositions clash.
Cross-linguistic data #
| Language | "then" form | Shifts perspective? |
|---|---|---|
| English | then | yes |
| German | damals/dann | yes |
| Mandarin | 那时 nà-shí | yes |
| Japanese | その時 sono-toki | yes |
| Greek | τότε tóte | yes |
| Russian | тогда togda | yes |
| Hebrew | אז az | yes |
| Hungarian | akkor | yes |
All "then" adverbs from Fragment entries.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Every "then" adverb in our inventory shifts perspective.
Root clause: PRES (R = P) + isSimpleCase (P = S) means R = S. ⌈then⌉ requires its reference ≠ π = S. Since composition puts the PRES reference inside the then reference, both equal S in the point model, contradicting then's presupposition.
The root-clause incompatibility is a corollary of the general
perspective clash: in root clauses, π = S (no OP_π), so
localEval = S and then_perspective_clash applies.
⌈then⌉ + deleted tense is compatible: when SOT deletes the embedded tense, no presupposition anchors it to π, so ⌈then⌉ can freely pick a reference disjoint from π.