@cite{krifka-1998} Bridge: Telicity Propagation → Fragment Verbs #
@cite{krifka-1998} @cite{vendler-1957}
Connects Krifka's mereological telicity theory (Events/Krifka1998.lean) to
concrete verb entries in Fragments/English/Predicates/Verbal.lean and
diagnostic predictions in DiagnosticsBridge.lean.
Structure #
- Per-verb incrementality verification — each verb's
verbIncClassannotation is checked byrfl. - VendlerClass → MereoTag bridge — accomplishments map to QUA, activities to CUM, connecting Vendler to Krifka.
- Compositional telicity — sinc verb + QUA NP → QUA VP (telic);
sinc verb + CUM NP → CUM VP (atelic). Instantiated for
eat. - Diagnostic bridge — for/in compatibility follows from CUM/QUA via Vendler class.
Each verb's verbIncClass annotation is verified by rfl. Changing
any annotation breaks exactly one theorem here.
"eat" is strictly incremental (consumption: bijective theme-event map).
"devour" is strictly incremental (consumption variant of eat).
"build" is strictly incremental (creation: bijective theme-event map).
"write" is strictly incremental (creation verb).
"read" is incremental but not strictly so (allows re-reading).
"push" is cumulative only (no incremental theme).
"pull" is cumulative only (no incremental theme).
"carry" is cumulative only (no incremental theme).
"drag" is cumulative only (no incremental theme).
Intransitives have no incremental theme.
Unaccusatives have no incremental theme.
Contact verbs have no incremental theme.
"eat" is an accomplishment (with quantized object).
"kick" is an activity (semelfactive/contact).
"see" is a state (perception).
These connect the Vendler classification to Krifka's CUM/QUA distinction
via Telicity.toMereoTag. The chain is:
VendlerClass → Telicity → MereoTag → CUM/QUA mereological property.
Accomplishments are telic, hence QUA.
Achievements are telic, hence QUA.
Activities are atelic, hence CUM.
States are atelic, hence CUM.
The payoff: verb incrementality + NP reference property → VP telicity. These instantiate @cite{krifka-1998} §3.3 for concrete verb entries.
"eat apples": sinc verb + CUM NP → CUM VP (atelic). @cite{krifka-1998}: CumTheta(θ) ∧ CUM(OBJ) → CUM(VP θ OBJ). The verb's incrementality class is sinc, and bare plurals are CUM.
"eat two apples": sinc verb + QUA NP → QUA VP (telic). @cite{krifka-1998}: SINC(θ) ∧ QUA(OBJ) → QUA(VP θ OBJ). The verb's incrementality class is sinc, and "two apples" is QUA.
"build a house": sinc verb + QUA NP → QUA VP (telic).
"read the book": inc verb + QUA NP → VP is telic (INC is weaker than SINC, but still transmits QUA from NP to VP when the object is quantized).
"push the cart": cumOnly verb → no telicity transfer from NP. Regardless of the NP's reference property, cumOnly verbs yield atelic (CUM) VPs.
"write a letter": sinc verb + QUA NP → QUA VP (telic).
Connect CUM/QUA → for/in diagnostic compatibility. Atelic (CUM) VPs accept "for X"; telic (QUA) VPs accept "in X".
Telic VPs (QUA) license "in X" adverbials.
Atelic VPs (CUM) license "for X" adverbials.
"eat two apples" (accomplishment) licenses "in X".
"eat apples" (activity) licenses "for X".
"build a house" (accomplishment) licenses "in X".
"run" (activity) licenses "for X".
"sleep" (state) licenses "for X".
"arrive" (achievement) licenses "in X".
Verify that incrementality annotations are consistent with Vendler classes: only accomplishments can have non-none verbIncClass.
All sinc-annotated verbs are accomplishments.
The inc-annotated verb "read" is an accomplishment.
All cumOnly-annotated verbs are activities.
Connects GRAD/GRADSquare theory from Events/Krifka1998.lean and
Events/Krifka1989.lean to concrete verb entries.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Krifka1998.instBEqGRADDatum.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Krifka1998.eatGRAD = { verb := "eat", objectMeasure := "weight/volume", expectsGRAD := true }
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Krifka1998.buildGRAD = { verb := "build", objectMeasure := "proportion done", expectsGRAD := true }
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Krifka1998.readGRAD = { verb := "read", objectMeasure := "pages", expectsGRAD := true }
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Krifka1998.pushNoGRAD = { verb := "push", objectMeasure := "weight", expectsGRAD := false }
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Krifka1998.kickNoGRAD = { verb := "kick", objectMeasure := "force", expectsGRAD := false }
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Whether a verb's incrementality class predicts GRAD.
Equations
- Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Krifka1998.predictsGRAD (some Semantics.Events.Krifka1998.VerbIncClass.sinc) = true
- Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Krifka1998.predictsGRAD (some Semantics.Events.Krifka1998.VerbIncClass.inc) = true
- Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Krifka1998.predictsGRAD (some Semantics.Events.Krifka1998.VerbIncClass.cumOnly) = false
- Phenomena.TenseAspect.Studies.Krifka1998.predictsGRAD none = false
Instances For
All GRAD data matches fragment verb annotations.
sinc verbs have prerequisites for GRADSquare; cumOnly verbs don't.