Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.SocialMeaning.Studies.Burnett2019

@cite{burnett-2019} — Signalling Games, Sociolinguistic Variation, and #

the Construction of Style

Linguistics and Philosophy 42: 419–450.

Overview #

Social Meaning Games (SMGs) model how sociolinguistic variant choice conveys social information. A speaker's use of -ing vs -in' induces listener inferences about persona traits (competent, friendly, etc.). The framework combines @cite{lewis-1969}'s signalling games with RSA-style Bayesian reasoning to derive both style shifting (intra-speaker variation across contexts) and social stratification (inter-speaker variation across classes) from the same principles.

Architecture #

The meaning function is grounded in the Eckert–Montague lift from EckertMontague.emMeaningMI: each variant's Eckert field (a set of indexed properties) is lifted to persona compatibility via intersection semantics. The grounding theorem ingMeaning_eq_emMeaningMI verifies that the study's meaning function matches the theory-layer derivation.

Each context is an RSAConfig INGVariant Persona with beliefBased S1 scoring (S1(v|π) ∝ L0(π|v)^α, α=6) and context-specific worldPrior. All predictions are verified by rsa_predict.

Key predictions #

  1. Per-persona variant preference: cool-guy prefers -in' ~69%
  2. Style shifting: casual→careful flips the cool-guy's preference
  3. Stern-leader exclusion: -in' is incompatible with stern leader
  4. Listener interpretation: Rice/Pelosi/Bush /t/ release predictions
  5. Bulletproofing: strong prior overwhelms variant effects (Bush)
  6. Cross-reference: model predictions close to @cite{labov-2012} data

Social properties (Burnett example (5)). Two bipolar dimensions: competence (competent/incompetent) and warmth (friendly/aloof).

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

      The four personae: maximally consistent subsets (Burnett example (6)). Each selects one pole per dimension.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

          ING variants (Burnett example (8)).

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

              Eckert fields (Burnett example (10)):

              The meaning function is derived via the Montagovian Individual / intersection semantics (Burnett footnote 14, Table 1): persona p is compatible with variant v iff p shares at least one property with v's Eckert field.

              The property space for Burnett's simplified example.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Persona membership as a Finset.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Eckert fields for (ING) (Burnett example (10)).

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    The ING grounded field: both Eckert fields are consistent.

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Meaning via the EM intersection lift: persona p is compatible with variant v iff p shares ≥1 property with v's Eckert field.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Grounding theorem: the inline meaning function equals the theory-layer emMeaningMI applied to the ING Eckert fields.

                        -ing is compatible with 3 personae (Table 1: excludes doofus).

                        -in' is compatible with 3 personae (Table 1: excludes stern leader).

                        Each social context is an RSAConfig INGVariant Persona:

                        @[reducible, inline]
                        noncomputable abbrev Phenomena.SocialMeaning.Studies.Burnett2019.mkSMG (prior : Persona) (h : ∀ (p : Persona), 0 prior p) :

                        Construct an SMG as an RSAConfig with context-specific prior.

                        The meaning function incorporates the prior so that L0 matches Burnett's naive listener: L₀(π|v) ∝ Pr(π) · ⟦v⟧(π). Without the prior in meaning, L0 would be uniform over compatible personae (1/3 for all), erasing the context-dependence that drives style shifting.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For
                          @[reducible, inline]
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For
                            @[reducible, inline]
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Rice: uniform prior — unfamiliar politician (Burnett Table 10).

                              Equations
                              Instances For
                                @[reducible, inline]
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For
                                  @[reducible, inline]
                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For
                                    @[reducible, inline]
                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      Cool-guy at the barbecue prefers -in' over -ing (~69% vs ~31%). Burnett (p. 435): "we predict that Obama will use -in' around 69% of the time [...] which is close to what Labov found" (72%).

                                      Stern leader only uses -ing: -in' is incompatible (Table 1). This predicts ~0% -in' in formal contexts where Obama constructs the stern leader.

                                      In the careful context, the cool-guy now prefers -ing over -in'. The prior shift reverses the informativity ranking.

                                      The /t/ release variable has the same mathematical structure as (ING). Relabeling: articulate↔competent, inarticulate↔incompetent (same friendly/aloof). Variants: released [tʰ]↔-ing, flapped [ɾ]↔-in'. The Eckert fields are structurally identical (Burnett example (19)): [tʰ] = {articulate, aloof}, [ɾ] = {inarticulate, friendly}.

                                      We reuse the same types and meaning function, since the math is isomorphic. The personae reinterpret as: coolGuy ↔ {articulate, friendly}, sternLeader ↔ {articulate, aloof}, doofus ↔ {inarticulate, friendly}, asshole ↔ {inarticulate, aloof}.

                                      The asshole prefers -in' in the casual context (both variants are compatible, but -in' is more informative given the prior).

                                      Rice: released /t/ triggers {articulate, aloof} = stern leader (Burnett Table 11). With uniform prior, the exclusive variant (only -ing compatible) gets double the L1 weight.

                                      Rice: flapped /t/ triggers {inarticulate, friendly} = doofus (Burnett Table 11). Symmetric to the released case.

                                      Pelosi: released /t/ predominantly triggers {inarticulate, aloof} — the strong prior that she is inarticulate overwhelms the released /t/ association with articulateness (Burnett Table 14).

                                      Bush "bulletproofing" (Burnett p. 444, Table 16): the prior is so extreme that variant choice has no practical effect. Both released and flapped /t/ yield >90% {inarticulate, aloof}.