Eckert-Montague Lift (@cite{burnett-2019}, Definition 3.4) #
@cite{burnett-2019}
Burnett's set-theoretic reinterpretation of @cite{eckert-2008}'s indexical field. A variant's social meaning is formalized as the set of personae compatible with the properties it indexes.
The EM field #
Given a grounded indexical field F : Variant → Finset Property, the
Eckert-Montague lift maps each variant to its compatible personae:
EM(F)(v) = { p ∈ Persona | F(v) ⊆ p.properties }
This is analogous to Montague's lift from entities to generalized quantifiers: a variant doesn't denote a single persona but a set of personae — those consistent with the social properties it indexes.
Bridge: fromIndexicalField #
The fromIndexicalField function converts sign-valued indexical fields
(from Core.SocialMeaning) into grounded fields over the SCM property
space. This bridges existing studies (BSB2022, B&S2024) to Burnett's
formalism:
- positive association → positive pole property
- negative association → negative pole property
- zero association → no property indexed on that dimension
A grounded indexical field: maps each variant to a consistent set of properties from a property space.
This is the set-theoretic version of Eckert's indexical field. Each variant indexes a set of social properties; the set must be internally consistent (no incompatible properties).
Properties indexed by each variant.
The indexed property set is always consistent.
Instances For
The Eckert-Montague lift (Burnett Def. 3.4): the set of personae compatible with a variant's indexed properties.
EM(F)(v) = { p ∈ allPersonaeSets | F(v) ⊆ p }
More properties indexed → fewer compatible personae (antitonicity).
Equations
- Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.emField gf v = {persona ∈ ps.allPersonaeSets | gf.indexedProperties v ⊆ persona}
Instances For
The EM lift is antitone: more indexed properties → fewer compatible personae.
Decidable predicate: whether an SCM property is indexed by a variant given a sign-valued field over social dimensions.
Maps association signs to SCM poles:
association(v, d) > 0→ positive pole of dimension dassociation(v, d) < 0→ negative pole of dimension dassociation(v, d) = 0→ no property on dimension d
Equations
- Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.scmPropertyIndexed field v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SCMProperty.competent = (field.association v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SocialDimension.competence > 0)
- Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.scmPropertyIndexed field v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SCMProperty.incompetent = (field.association v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SocialDimension.competence < 0)
- Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.scmPropertyIndexed field v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SCMProperty.warm = (field.association v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SocialDimension.warmth > 0)
- Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.scmPropertyIndexed field v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SCMProperty.cold = (field.association v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SocialDimension.warmth < 0)
- Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.scmPropertyIndexed field v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SCMProperty.solidary = (field.association v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SocialDimension.antiSolidarity < 0)
- Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.scmPropertyIndexed field v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SCMProperty.antiSolidary = (field.association v Sociolinguistics.SCM.SocialDimension.antiSolidarity > 0)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Equations
Instances For
The SCM properties derived from a sign-valued field are always
consistent: no variant can index both poles of the same dimension,
because x > 0 and x < 0 cannot both hold.
Convert a sign-valued IndexicalField to a GroundedField over
the SCM property space.
Equations
- Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.fromIndexicalField field = { indexedProperties := Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.scmPropertiesFromField field, indexed_consistent := ⋯ }
Instances For
The Eckert–Montague lift with intersection semantics: a persona is
compatible with variant v iff the persona shares at least one
property with v's Eckert field.
This is the Montagovian Individual interpretation from footnote 14 of @cite{burnett-2019}: EM({p₁, p₂}) = {π ∈ PERS | p₁ ∈ π ∨ p₂ ∈ π}.
Compare emField (§2 above) which uses the subset semantics
(all indexed properties must be in the persona). The intersection
semantics gives a weaker / more inclusive meaning function, matching
Burnett's Table 1.
Equations
- Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.emFieldMI gf v = {persona ∈ ps.allPersonaeSets | decide (∃ p ∈ gf.indexedProperties v, p ∈ persona) = true}
Instances For
Meaning function from the intersection-based EM lift.
Returns true iff persona shares at least one property with the
Eckert field of v.
Equations
- Sociolinguistics.EckertMontague.emMeaningMI gf v persona = decide (∃ p ∈ gf.indexedProperties v, p ∈ persona)
Instances For
The intersection-based EM lift is monotone: more indexed properties
→ more compatible personae (opposite of emField_antitone).