@cite{van-tiel-franke-sauerland-2021} #
"Probabilistic pragmatics explains gradience and focality in natural language quantification" PNAS 118(9): e2005453118
This paper compares two semantic theories of quantity words:
GQT (Generalized Quantifier Theory): Binary threshold semantics
- Monotone increasing (some, most, all): t >= theta
- Monotone decreasing (few, none): t <= theta
Prototype Theory (PT): Gradient Gaussian semantics
- L_PT(m, t) = exp(-((t - p_m) / d_m)^2)
Combined with two speaker models:
- Literal (S0): P_Slit(m | t) proportional to Salience(m) * L(m, t)
- Pragmatic (S1): P_Sprag(m | t) proportional to Salience(m) * L_lit(t | m)^alpha
Experiments #
Exp. 1a/1b: Production study (600/200 participants)
- 432 circles (red/black), describe "— of the circles are red"
- Recorded which quantity words participants used
Exp. 2: Monotonicity judgments (120 participants)
- Tested inference patterns to classify monotonicity
Exp. 3: ANS estimation (20 participants)
- Estimated Weber's fraction w = 0.576
Exp. 4: Model evaluation (200 participants)
- Rated adequacy of model-predicted quantity words
Main Result #
GQ-pragmatic model explains gradience as well as prototype-based models. Gradience emerges from pragmatic competition, not encoded in semantics.
Grounding #
Connects to Semantics.Montague.Quantifiers for threshold semantics.
The 17 quantity words studied (in order from low to high intersection)
- none_ : QuantityWord
- hardlyAny : QuantityWord
- veryFew : QuantityWord
- aFew : QuantityWord
- few : QuantityWord
- lessThanHalf : QuantityWord
- some_ : QuantityWord
- several : QuantityWord
- half : QuantityWord
- aboutHalf : QuantityWord
- many : QuantityWord
- moreThanHalf : QuantityWord
- aLot : QuantityWord
- majority : QuantityWord
- most : QuantityWord
- almostAll : QuantityWord
- all : QuantityWord
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
All quantity words in experimental order
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Monotonicity determines threshold direction in GQT
- increasing : Monotonicity
- decreasing : Monotonicity
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Empirically determined monotonicity (from Exp. 2, Table in paper)
Participants judged inference patterns:
- Monotone increasing: "Q of the people P1 → Q of the people P2" valid when P1 ⊂ P2
- Monotone decreasing: "Q of the people P2 → Q of the people P1" valid when P1 ⊂ P2
Classification: clustered with "all" (increasing) or "none" (decreasing)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Decreasing quantifiers (from paper: "few," "hardly any," "less than half," "none," "very few")
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Increasing quantifiers (all others)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Log-likelihood of test data (Exp. 1b) for each model
Higher is better. GQ-prag achieves the best fit.
Equations
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.logLikelihood Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.Model.gqLit = -1717
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.logLikelihood Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.Model.ptLit = -1660
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.logLikelihood Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.Model.gqPrag = -1625
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.logLikelihood Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.Model.ptPrag = -1675
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
GQ-prag is the only model not significantly worse than data (p > 0.05)
Equations
Instances For
Weber's fraction estimated from Exp. 3
Represents sensitivity to relative differences in numerosity. Higher w means less precise number discrimination.
Equations
Instances For
Total set size in experiments
Instances For
Number of possible intersection set sizes (0 through 432)
Instances For
Approximate prototype (peak production) for each quantity word.
These are rough estimates from Fig. 1A in the paper. Values are approximate intersection set sizes where production peaks.
Equations
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.none_ = 0
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.hardlyAny = 10
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.veryFew = 20
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.aFew = 40
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.few = 60
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.lessThanHalf = 160
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.some_ = 80
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.several = 100
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.half = 216
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.aboutHalf = 216
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.many = 280
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.moreThanHalf = 260
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.aLot = 300
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.majority = 300
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.most = 340
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.almostAll = 400
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.approximatePrototype Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.all = 432
Instances For
Production data shows gradience (quantitative pattern)
Instances For
Production data shows focal points (qualitative pattern)
Instances For
Multiple quantity words can describe same state
Instances For
"some" and "few" don't stand in entailment relation
Number of participants in Exp. 1a (training)
Instances For
Number of participants in Exp. 1b (test)
Instances For
Number of participants in Exp. 2 (monotonicity)
Instances For
Number of participants in Exp. 3 (ANS)
Instances For
Number of participants in Exp. 4 (evaluation)
Instances For
These 17 quantity words account for 87% of production data
Instances For
Domain size (simplified from 432 to 10)
Instances For
Intersection set sizes (simplified from 0-432 to 0-10)
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Threshold for each quantity word (from unified entry)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
GQT meaning: binary truth based on threshold
Equations
Instances For
GQT meaning as rational
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Prototype (peak truth) for each quantity word (from unified entry)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Spread parameter (from unified entry)
Equations
Instances For
PT meaning: gradient truth based on distance from prototype
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Salience prior (uniform for simplicity)
Equations
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.RSAModel.salience Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.none_ = 1
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.RSAModel.salience Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.few = 1
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.RSAModel.salience Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.some_ = 1
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.RSAModel.salience Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.half = 1
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.RSAModel.salience Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.most = 1
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.RSAModel.salience Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.all = 1
Instances For
"some" threshold matches Montague's existential: count >= 1
"all" threshold matches Montague's universal: count = total
"most" threshold > half matches Montague's most_sem
"some" and "few" have opposite monotonicity (no entailment)
Connects the RSA quantity-word production model to the empirical monotonicity classifications.
Convert RSA model's QuantityWord to empirical data type.
Equations
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.toDataWord Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.none_ = Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.none_
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.toDataWord Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.few = Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.few
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.toDataWord Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.some_ = Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.some_
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.toDataWord Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.half = Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.half
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.toDataWord Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.most = Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.most
- Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.toDataWord Fragments.English.Determiners.QuantityWord.all = Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.Studies.VanTielEtAl2021.QuantityWord.all
Instances For
Monotonicity matches empirical classification for clear cases (excluding "half").
Note: "half" is classified as nonMonotone in the three-way system but as "increasing" in the binary empirical classification.