Turk, Hirsch & İnce (2026) — Category Match Bridge #
@cite{fox-katzir-2011} @cite{kratzer-selkirk-2020} @cite{rooth-1992} @cite{turk-hirsch-2026}
Connects the empirical judgments in PolarAnswers.lean (modal answers
are infelicitous to Turkish polar questions) to the formal explanation:
@cite{fox-katzir-2011} category match over UPOS tags.
The Problem #
Turkish mI heads PolP and bears focus (Σ_F). Under Rooth-style type-theoretic alternative computation, any operator of the same semantic type counts as an alternative — including deontic modals. This yields {p, ¬p, □p}, wrongly predicting □p is a felicitous answer.
The Fix #
Category match restricts alternatives to items sharing mI's UPOS tag
PART. Polarity operators (Σ, NEG) are PART; "must" is AUX.
Category match yields {p, ¬p} — the correct polar question.
Scenario #
Four worlds: Ali sleeps/doesn't × deontic must/free.
Four worlds crossing Ali-sleeps with deontic-must.
- sleeps_must : PolarWorld
- sleeps_free : PolarWorld
- nosleep_must : PolarWorld
- nosleep_free : PolarWorld
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
p = "Ali sleeps": true when Ali sleeps regardless of modality.
Equations
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.p Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.sleeps_must = true
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.p Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.sleeps_free = true
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.p Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.nosleep_must = false
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.p Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.nosleep_free = false
Instances For
¬p = "Ali doesn't sleep".
Equations
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.notP Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.sleeps_must = false
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.notP Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.sleeps_free = false
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.notP Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.nosleep_must = true
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.notP Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.nosleep_free = true
Instances For
□p = "Ali must sleep" (deontic necessity).
Equations
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.mustP Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.sleeps_must = true
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.mustP Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.sleeps_free = false
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.mustP Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.nosleep_must = true
- Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.mustP Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026.PolarWorld.nosleep_free = false
Instances For
The lexicon of propositional operators at type ⟨⟨s,t⟩,t⟩.
Polarity heads (Σ, NEG) are tagged PART; the deontic modal is AUX.
This UPOS distinction is what category match exploits.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Type-theoretic alternatives (Rooth D_τ): all operators regardless of UPOS → {p, ¬p, □p}. Over-generates.
Equations
Instances For
Category-match alternatives: only PART-tagged
operators → {p, ¬p}. Correct.
Equations
Instances For
Type-theoretic question: {p, ¬p, □p} — over-generated.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Category-match question: {p, ¬p} — correct.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The expected polar question: {p, ¬p}.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The spurious prediction: □p is an answer to the type-theoretic question. Under Rooth-style D_τ, "Ali must sleep" is predicted to be a felicitous answer to "Does Ali sleep?" — which is empirically wrong.
The correct prediction: □p is NOT an answer to the polar question. "Ali must sleep" is not a felicitous answer to a yes/no question about whether Ali sleeps.
Category match fixes the over-generation: □p is NOT an answer to the category-matched question.
Connect the empirical judgments from PolarAnswers.lean to the
formal model. The data says modal answers are infelicitous;
the theory (category match) explains why: □p is excluded from
the Hamblin alternative set.
The empirical datum: modal answer is infelicitous.
The theory predicts it: □p is not an answer under category match.
The theory would wrongly predict felicity without category match.
The connection to @cite{kratzer-selkirk-2020} is via the A-value of a [FoC]-marked expression. In Rooth/K&S's framework, the A-value of a [FoC]-marked constituent is the set of alternatives of the same semantic type — i.e., exactly the type-theoretic D_τ computation.
Turk et al.'s contribution is showing that this over-generates for
Turkish polar questions, and that category match
is the correct constraint on alternative computation.
Applying [FoC] with type-theoretic A-value yields the over-generating set.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The type-theoretic A-value produces the wrong question denotation.
Restricting the A-value by category match corrects the prediction.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The category-matched A-value produces the correct question denotation.
The Turkish mI particle's UPOS tag matches the category used in the category-match computation.