Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Questions.Studies.TurkHirschInce2026

Turk, Hirsch & İnce (2026) — Category Match Bridge #

@cite{fox-katzir-2011} @cite{kratzer-selkirk-2020} @cite{rooth-1992} @cite{turk-hirsch-2026}

Connects the empirical judgments in PolarAnswers.lean (modal answers are infelicitous to Turkish polar questions) to the formal explanation: @cite{fox-katzir-2011} category match over UPOS tags.

The Problem #

Turkish mI heads PolP and bears focus (Σ_F). Under Rooth-style type-theoretic alternative computation, any operator of the same semantic type counts as an alternative — including deontic modals. This yields {p, ¬p, □p}, wrongly predicting □p is a felicitous answer.

The Fix #

Category match restricts alternatives to items sharing mI's UPOS tag PART. Polarity operators (Σ, NEG) are PART; "must" is AUX. Category match yields {p, ¬p} — the correct polar question.

Scenario #

Four worlds: Ali sleeps/doesn't × deontic must/free.

Four worlds crossing Ali-sleeps with deontic-must.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        The lexicon of propositional operators at type ⟨⟨s,t⟩,t⟩. Polarity heads (Σ, NEG) are tagged PART; the deontic modal is AUX. This UPOS distinction is what category match exploits.

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Type-theoretic question: {p, ¬p, □p} — over-generated.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Category-match question: {p, ¬p} — correct.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              The expected polar question: {p, ¬p}.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Category-matched question = standard polar question. Fox & Katzir's category match yields the correct {p, ¬p} partition.

                Type-theoretic question ≠ polar question. The D_τ computation admits □p as an answer, which the polar question rejects.

                The spurious prediction: □p is an answer to the type-theoretic question. Under Rooth-style D_τ, "Ali must sleep" is predicted to be a felicitous answer to "Does Ali sleep?" — which is empirically wrong.

                The correct prediction: □p is NOT an answer to the polar question. "Ali must sleep" is not a felicitous answer to a yes/no question about whether Ali sleeps.

                Category match fixes the over-generation: □p is NOT an answer to the category-matched question.

                Connect the empirical judgments from PolarAnswers.lean to the formal model. The data says modal answers are infelicitous; the theory (category match) explains why: □p is excluded from the Hamblin alternative set.

                The connection to @cite{kratzer-selkirk-2020} is via the A-value of a [FoC]-marked expression. In Rooth/K&S's framework, the A-value of a [FoC]-marked constituent is the set of alternatives of the same semantic type — i.e., exactly the type-theoretic D_τ computation.

                Turk et al.'s contribution is showing that this over-generates for
                Turkish polar questions, and that category match
                is the correct constraint on alternative computation. 
                

                Applying [FoC] with type-theoretic A-value yields the over-generating set.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Restricting the A-value by category match corrects the prediction.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    The Turkish mI particle's UPOS tag matches the category used in the category-match computation.