Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Questions.PolarAnswers

@cite{groenendijk-stokhof-1984}: Yes and No are T⁰ (sentence adverbs, category S/S). @cite{fox-katzir-2011}

  • yes ~ λp.p(a) (affirms the proposition)
  • no ~ λp.¬p(a) (negates the proposition)

This makes sentential interrogatives derivable by the same IA-rule as constituent interrogatives, with AB⁰ = S and T⁰ = S/S.

  • question : String

    The polar question

  • answer : String

    The answer (yes/no form)

  • positive : Bool

    Is this positive or negative?

  • meaning : String

    The proposition expressed by the answer

  • source : String

    Source

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      G&S p. 321: "Does John walk?"

      Equations
      Instances For
        Equations
        Instances For

          @cite{groenendijk-stokhof-1984}, p. 324-326: A conditional answer to a polar question receives a BICONDITIONAL interpretation via exhaustification.

          "Does John walk?" → "If Mary walks" means: John walks IFF Mary walks (not just: John walks IF Mary walks)

          • question : String

            The polar question

          • conditionalAnswer : String

            The conditional answer

          • surfaceMeaning : String

            Surface form (what was said)

          • exhaustifiedMeaning : String

            Exhaustified meaning (what was understood)

          • source : String

            Source

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              G&S p. 324: Conditional becomes biconditional in answer context

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                When the question itself is about a conditional, no strengthening occurs

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Conditional vs biconditional reading depends on whether the question targets the conditional itself or its consequent.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    @cite{groenendijk-stokhof-1984}, p. 327: Similar to conditionals, disjunctions in answers receive exclusive interpretation via exhaustification.

                    • question : String

                      The polar question

                    • disjunctiveAnswer : String

                      The disjunctive answer

                    • exclusive : Bool

                      Inclusive or exclusive reading?

                    • explanation : String

                      Explanation

                    • source : String

                      Source

                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Disjunction becomes exclusive when answering about disjunct

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Disjunction stays inclusive when answering about disjunction itself

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            @cite{groenendijk-stokhof-1984}, p. 331-334: Negation in interrogatives does NOT contribute to semantic content. Instead, it marks a doxastic attitude: the questioner expects a negative answer.

                            "Doesn't John walk?" asks the SAME question as "Does John walk?" but marks that the questioner expects "No" as the answer.

                            Note: sameQuestion encodes the G&S 1984 analysis. @cite{holmberg-2016} argues that positive and negative polar questions are NOT the same question: the negative question's primary proposition (the one the speaker expects) is ¬p, producing different discourse effects and cross-linguistic answer patterns. The value here reflects only the G&S view.

                            • positiveForm : String

                              The positive form of the question

                            • negativeForm : String

                              The negative form of the question

                            • sameQuestion : Bool

                              Do they express the same question semantically? Note: this is the @cite{groenendijk-stokhof-1984} analysis; @cite{holmberg-2016} argues they differ.

                            • noMeaning : String

                              What does "No" mean as an answer to the negative form?

                            • doxasticAttitude : String

                              What attitude does the negative form mark?

                            • source : String

                              Source

                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                G&S p. 331: "Doesn't John walk?" vs "Does John walk?"

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  When answering against the questioner's expected polarity, the answer must be MARKED (emphatic stress, do-support).

                                  • question : String

                                    The question

                                  • expectedPolarity : Bool

                                    Expected answer polarity based on question form

                                  • unmarkedAnswer : String

                                    Unmarked answer (goes with expectation)

                                  • markedAnswer : String

                                    Marked answer (goes against expectation)

                                  • source : String

                                    Source

                                  Instances For
                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      Negative interrogative expects negative; positive answer needs marking

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        Positive interrogative with positive marking expects positive

                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          G&S p. 333: Clear evidence that negation in interrogatives is not semantic: "Are you not happy?" vs "Are you unhappy?" have different answer patterns.

                                          • negatedForm : String

                                            Interrogative with negation

                                          • antonymForm : String

                                            Interrogative with antonym

                                          • noMeaning_negated : String

                                            What "No" means for negated form

                                          • noMeaning_antonym : String

                                            What "No" means for antonym form

                                          • sameQuestion : Bool

                                            Are these the same question?

                                          • source : String

                                            Source

                                          Instances For
                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For
                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For

                                                G&S's explanation for why negation can be used non-semantically: In the semantics of interrogatives, "Does John walk?" and "Does John not walk?" express the SAME question (same partition). This opens up negation for non-semantic (doxastic) use.

                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For

                                                  Turk, Hirsch & İnce (2026) observe that deontic modal answers are infelicitous responses to Turkish polar questions formed with mI.

                                                  "Ali uyuyor mu?" ("Does Ali sleep?")
                                                  → "Evet" / "Hayır" — felicitous (polar answer)
                                                  → "Ali uyumalı" ("Ali must sleep") — infelicitous (modal answer)
                                                  
                                                  This is unexpected under Rooth-style type-theoretic alternative
                                                  computation, where □p has the same type as p and should be an
                                                  alternative. @cite{fox-katzir-2011} category match explains why:
                                                  *mI* is a particle (PART), modals are auxiliaries (AUX), so
                                                  category match excludes □p from the alternative set. 
                                                  

                                                  "Ali uyuyor mu?" → "Evet" (yes) — felicitous.

                                                  Equations
                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                  Instances For

                                                    "Ali uyuyor mu?" → "Hayır" (no) — felicitous.

                                                    Equations
                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                    Instances For

                                                      "Ali uyuyor mu?" → "Ali uyumalı" (Ali must sleep) — infelicitous. A deontic modal answer does not address the polar question.

                                                      Equations
                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                      Instances For
                                                        Equations
                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                        Instances For

                                                          Modal answers are infelicitous to Turkish polar questions.