Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Modality.ModalConcord.LiuRotter2025

Modal Concord: Commitment and Social Meaning — @cite{rotter-liu-2025} #

@cite{liu-rotter-2025} @cite{zeijlstra-2007}

Empirical data from "Non-redundant modal concord: Evidence from speaker commitment and social meaning."

Key finding #

Modal concord (MC) is not semantically vacuous: necessity MC (must certainly) strengthens speaker commitment, while possibility MC (may possibly) weakens it. This FORCE × NUMBER interaction is not predicted by syntactic agreement, semantic identity, or the register approach.

MC also carries social meaning: necessity MC signals competence (higher SES, education, formality, confidence), while possibility MC signals warmth (higher friendliness, warmth). The social meaning mirrors the commitment direction.

Experiments #

Stimuli #

Experimental design #

NUMBER factor: single modal vs modal concord (doubled).

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Experimental condition: FORCE × NUMBER.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Experiment 1: Speaker commitment #

            160 participants (40 per condition) rated speaker commitment on a 7-point Likert scale ("How certain is the speaker that...").

            FORCE × NUMBER interaction: β = 0.56, SE = 0.17, t = 3.31, p = .001.

            Speaker commitment ratings (7-point Likert, 1=not at all certain, 7=completely certain).

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Key Experiment 1 empirical generalizations #

              Necessity MC strengthens commitment: must certainly is rated higher in speaker commitment than bare must (p = .03).

              Possibility MC weakens commitment: may possibly is rated lower in speaker commitment than bare may (p = .04).

              FORCE × NUMBER interaction: The direction of the concord effect reverses with force. Necessity MC strengthens, possibility MC weakens. This is the paper's central finding (β = 0.56, p = .001).

              MC is semantically non-vacuous: Both necessity and possibility MC differ from their single-modal counterparts. The syntactic agreement approach, which treats one modal as semantically vacuous, incorrectly predicts MC = SM.

              Necessity above possibility: Both SM and MC show higher commitment for necessity than possibility.

              theorem Phenomena.Modality.ModalConcord.LiuRotter2025.no_main_effect_of_number :
              have smMean := ((commitmentRating necSM).mean + (commitmentRating posSM).mean) / 2; have mcMean := ((commitmentRating necMC).mean + (commitmentRating posMC).mean) / 2; smMean - mcMean > -1 / 10 smMean - mcMean < 1 / 10

              No main effect of NUMBER: Grand means of SM and MC are close (within 0.1 points). The concord effect appears only as an interaction with FORCE (β = −0.03, p = .86).

              Experiment 2: Social meaning #

              160 participants (40 per condition) rated speakers on 7 social dimensions (7-point Likert scale) after hearing sentences.

              Social meaning dimensions (Experiment 2).

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Competence/warmth classification. Necessity MC increases competence dimensions, decreases warmth. Possibility MC does the reverse.

                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        FORCE × NUMBER interaction on a social dimension. Positive β: necessity MC scores higher (competence pattern). Negative β: necessity MC scores lower (warmth pattern).

                        Instances For
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            FORCE × NUMBER interaction results per social dimension. All 7 dimensions show significant interactions (p < .05).

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              Key Experiment 2 empirical generalizations #

                              Warmth dimensions have negative interaction: Necessity MC decreases perceived warmth (friendliness, warmth).

                              Social meaning mirrors commitment: Competence dimensions have positive β (matching necessity strengthening), warmth dimensions have negative β (matching possibility weakening). This parallel suggests the social meaning drives the commitment effect.