Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Ellipsis.Studies.Steedman2000Gapping

CCG Gapping Bridge #

@cite{ross-1970} @cite{steedman-2000}

Connects CCG category theory (from Theories.Syntax.CCG.Gapping) to empirical gapping data (from Phenomena.Ellipsis.Gapping).

Proves that:

  1. Gapping direction follows from lexical verb categories and word order
  2. Ross's generalization emerges from CCG's Principles of Consistency and Inheritance
  3. Dutch allows both gapping directions due to mixed word order

Gapping direction follows from available type-raised categories.

Forward gapping: gapped conjunct is leftward-looking (needs verb to left) -> requires backward type-raising (T(T/NP)) -> requires VSO/SVO verbs

Backward gapping: gapped conjunct is rightward-looking (needs verb to right) -> requires forward type-raising (T/(T\NP)) -> requires SOV verbs

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    Ross's generalization emerges from CCG's Principles of Consistency and Inheritance.

    The gapped conjunct's directionality is determined by:

    1. What type-raised categories are available (from verb categories)
    2. What composition rules preserve those directions

    This follows from the grammar rather than being stipulated.

    SVO patterns with VSO (forward gapping), not SOV (backward gapping).

    This is because SVO verbs ((S\NP)/NP) allow backward type-raising, which produces leftward-looking gapped constituents.

    English has no SOV verb category, so forward type-raising is not available.

    Without T/(T\NP), we cannot build a rightward-looking gapped conjunct. Hence "*Warren, potatoes and Dexter ate bread" is ungrammatical.

    Dutch has both VSO main verbs and SOV subordinate verbs. Therefore, Dutch licenses both type-raising directions.

    Equations
    Instances For