Category for a gapped subject+object cluster (e.g., "Warren, potatoes").
This is built by:
- Type-raising each NP: NP → T(T/NP)
- Backward composing: T(T/NP₁) ∘ T(T/NP₂) → T((T/NP₂)/NP₁)
The result needs a VSO transitive verb ((S/NP)/NP) to its LEFT.
Instances For
Category for a gapped subject alone (stripping: "and Warren (too)").
Instances For
Backward type-raised NP (for SVO/VSO gapping). T(T/NP) - combines with verbs to the LEFT.
Instances For
Forward type-raised NP (for SOV argument clusters). T/(T\NP) - combines with verbs to the RIGHT.
Instances For
The potential backward-gapped conjunct would need category S/((S\NP)/NP). But this requires forward composition of forward type-raised NPs. English doesn't license T/(T\NP) categories.
Instances For
The Principle of Inheritance ensures composed functions inherit directionality.
When we backward-compose two T(T/NP) categories: T(T/NP₁) ∘ T(T/NP₂) → T((T/NP₂)/NP₁)
The result is still leftward-looking (backslash on top). Hence it can only combine with a verb to its left.
The gapped conjunct S((S/NP)/NP) is leftward-looking.
The backslash on the outside means it seeks an argument to its left. Forward gapping (verb left, gap right) works in SVO for this reason.
The backward-gapped conjunct S/((S\NP)/NP) would be rightward-looking.
The slash on the outside means it seeks an argument to its right. This would require backward gapping (gap LEFT, verb RIGHT). But SVO doesn't license this category.
Stripping is gapping with a single remnant.
"Dexter ran away, and Warren (too)" Warren = S(S/NP)
This is just a type-raised subject coordinating with a decomposed sentence.
Instances For
Stripping shares the same word-order constraints as gapping. This is because both use the same type-raised categories.