Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.AgentFocus

Q'anjob'al Agent Focus and Extraction Fragment #

@cite{coon-mateo-pedro-preminger-2014}

Morphological data on Q'anjob'al (Q'anjob'alan, Mayan) related to extraction asymmetries, Agent Focus, and the Crazy Antipassive.

Person Morphology (table (13)) #

Q'anjob'al has two agreement paradigms head-marked on the predicate:

Status Suffixes (table (14)) #

The verb stem's final suffix encodes transitivity:

These surface only phrase-finally; non-final forms omit them.

Morpheme Order (HIGH-ABS) #

Template: ASP - ABS - ERG - ROOT - (DERIV) - SUFFIX

Absolutive immediately follows the aspect marker (pre-stem position), confirming Q'anjob'al as a HIGH-ABS language.

Extraction Asymmetries #

Agent Focus #

AF suffix -on attaches to the verb stem. The verb carries the intransitive status suffix -i (not transitive -V'). Absolutive agreement co-indexes the notional object (not the subject). Used for wh-questions, focus, and relativization targeting the agent.

Crazy Antipassive #

The same -on morpheme appears in non-finite embedded transitives: Chi uj [hin y-il-on-i] ix Malin 'Maria can see me.' Analyzed as the same case-assigning mechanism in environments where Infl⁰ is absent.

Person-number values relevant for Q'anjob'al agreement.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      3rd person absolutive is null (∅).

      3rd person ergative (pre-vocalic) is y-, pre-consonantal is s-.

      Verb status suffixes encode transitivity. Surface only phrase-finally.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Extraction possibilities in Q'anjob'al transitive clauses.

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Morphological properties of a Q'anjob'al verb form.

              • hasAFSuffix : Bool

                Does the verb bear the AF suffix -on?

              • statusSuffix : StatusSuffix

                Which status suffix: ITV or TV?

              • hasSetA : Bool

                Does the verb bear Set A (ergative) agreement?

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Regular transitive verb form.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        AF carries the intransitive status suffix -i, not -V'. This is the morphological reflex of AF Voice being non-phasal (intransitive v⁰). Despite the clause having two non-oblique core arguments, the verb's status suffix signals intransitivity.

                        AF lacks Set A (ergative) agreement.

                        Regular transitives have Set A agreement.

                        Can the agent be extracted with this verb form?

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          The Crazy Antipassive uses the same -on morpheme as AF, but in non-finite embedded transitives rather than extraction contexts. Both carry the intransitive status suffix -i.

                          Chi uj [hin y-il-on-i] ix Malin 'Maria can see me.' Lanan [hach hin-laq'-on-i] 'I am hugging you.'

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            The Crazy Antipassive is morphologically identical to AF.

                            In Q'anjob'al, AF is restricted to clauses with 3rd person agents. 1st and 2nd person agents use the regular transitive form even when focused or extracted. Compare (72a-b) of @cite{coon-mateo-pedro-preminger-2014}:

                            • 3rd person: A Juan max maq'-on[-i] no tx'i'. (AF required)
                            • 1st person: Ay-in max hin-maq'[-a'] no tx'i'. (regular transitive)

                            The tentative account: 1st/2nd person agents may be base-generated in a high clausal position (Spec,CP), so no extraction through the vP phase edge is needed — the trapping problem never arises.

                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                The Crazy Antipassive does NOT have this person restriction: it appears with all persons in non-finite embedded transitives. This is expected because the Crazy Antipassive is triggered by the absence of Infl⁰ (a property of the embedded clause), not by extraction through a phase edge.

                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Q'anjob'al's extraction morphology profile.

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For