Q'anjob'al Agent Focus and Extraction Fragment #
@cite{coon-mateo-pedro-preminger-2014}
Morphological data on Q'anjob'al (Q'anjob'alan, Mayan) related to extraction asymmetries, Agent Focus, and the Crazy Antipassive.
Person Morphology (table (13)) #
Q'anjob'al has two agreement paradigms head-marked on the predicate:
- Set A (ERG): prefixes with pre-consonantal and pre-vocalic allomorphs
- Set B (ABS): suffixes; 3rd person is null (∅)
Status Suffixes (table (14)) #
The verb stem's final suffix encodes transitivity:
- Intransitive: -i (ITV)
- Transitive: -V' (TV)
These surface only phrase-finally; non-final forms omit them.
Morpheme Order (HIGH-ABS) #
Template: ASP - ABS - ERG - ROOT - (DERIV) - SUFFIX
Absolutive immediately follows the aspect marker (pre-stem position), confirming Q'anjob'al as a HIGH-ABS language.
Extraction Asymmetries #
- S (intransitive subject): extracts freely
- P (transitive object): extracts freely
- A (transitive subject): banned without Agent Focus
Agent Focus #
AF suffix -on attaches to the verb stem. The verb carries the intransitive status suffix -i (not transitive -V'). Absolutive agreement co-indexes the notional object (not the subject). Used for wh-questions, focus, and relativization targeting the agent.
Crazy Antipassive #
The same -on morpheme appears in non-finite embedded transitives:
Chi uj [hin y-il-on-i] ix Malin 'Maria can see me.'
Analyzed as the same case-assigning mechanism in environments where
Infl⁰ is absent.
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.instBEqPN.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Set A (ergative/possessive) markers: pre-consonantal allomorphs.
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreC Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p1sg = "hin-"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreC Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p2sg = "ha-"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreC Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p3sg = "s-"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreC Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p1pl = "ko-"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreC Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p2pl = "he-"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreC Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p3pl = "s-…heb'"
Instances For
Set A (ergative/possessive) markers: pre-vocalic allomorphs.
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreV Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p1sg = "w-"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreV Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p2sg = "h-"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreV Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p3sg = "y-"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreV Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p1pl = "j-"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreV Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p2pl = "hey-"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setAPreV Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p3pl = "y-…heb'"
Instances For
Set B (absolutive) markers: suffixes.
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setBMarker Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p1sg = "-in"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setBMarker Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p2sg = "-ach"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setBMarker Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p3sg = "-∅"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setBMarker Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p1pl = "-on"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setBMarker Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p2pl = "-ex"
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.setBMarker Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.PN.p3pl = "heb'"
Instances For
3rd person absolutive is null (∅).
Verb status suffixes encode transitivity. Surface only phrase-finally.
- itv : StatusSuffix
- tv : StatusSuffix
Instances For
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.instBEqStatusSuffix.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Extraction possibilities in Q'anjob'al transitive clauses.
- intranS : ExtractionTarget
- patient : ExtractionTarget
- agent : ExtractionTarget
Instances For
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.instBEqExtractionTarget.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Can this argument be A-bar extracted from a regular transitive clause?
Equations
Instances For
A (transitive subject) cannot be extracted.
S and P extract freely.
Morphological properties of a Q'anjob'al verb form.
- hasAFSuffix : Bool
Does the verb bear the AF suffix -on?
- statusSuffix : StatusSuffix
Which status suffix: ITV or TV?
- hasSetA : Bool
Does the verb bear Set A (ergative) agreement?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.instBEqVerbMorphology.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Regular transitive verb form.
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.regularTransitive = { hasAFSuffix := false, statusSuffix := Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.StatusSuffix.tv, hasSetA := true }
Instances For
Agent Focus verb form.
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.agentFocusForm = { hasAFSuffix := true, statusSuffix := Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.StatusSuffix.itv, hasSetA := false }
Instances For
AF carries the intransitive status suffix -i, not -V'. This is the morphological reflex of AF Voice being non-phasal (intransitive v⁰). Despite the clause having two non-oblique core arguments, the verb's status suffix signals intransitivity.
AF lacks Set A (ergative) agreement.
Regular transitives have Set A agreement.
Can the agent be extracted with this verb form?
Equations
Instances For
AF permits agent extraction; regular transitive does not.
The Crazy Antipassive uses the same -on morpheme as AF, but in non-finite embedded transitives rather than extraction contexts. Both carry the intransitive status suffix -i.
Chi uj [hin y-il-on-i] ix Malin 'Maria can see me.'
Lanan [hach hin-laq'-on-i] 'I am hugging you.'
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.crazyAntipassiveForm = { hasAFSuffix := true, statusSuffix := Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.StatusSuffix.itv, hasSetA := false }
Instances For
The Crazy Antipassive is morphologically identical to AF.
In Q'anjob'al, AF is restricted to clauses with 3rd person agents. 1st and 2nd person agents use the regular transitive form even when focused or extracted. Compare (72a-b) of @cite{coon-mateo-pedro-preminger-2014}:
- 3rd person:
A Juan max maq'-on[-i] no tx'i'.(AF required) - 1st person:
Ay-in max hin-maq'[-a'] no tx'i'.(regular transitive)
The tentative account: 1st/2nd person agents may be base-generated in a high clausal position (Spec,CP), so no extraction through the vP phase edge is needed — the trapping problem never arises.
- first : PersonRestriction
- second : PersonRestriction
- third : PersonRestriction
Instances For
Equations
- Fragments.Mayan.Qanjobal.instBEqPersonRestriction.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Does AF apply for this person of agent? Only 3rd person.
Equations
Instances For
The Crazy Antipassive does NOT have this person restriction: it appears with all persons in non-finite embedded transitives. This is expected because the Crazy Antipassive is triggered by the absence of Infl⁰ (a property of the embedded clause), not by extraction through a phase edge.
Equations
- _p.requiresCrazyAP = true
Instances For
Q'anjob'al's extraction morphology profile.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.