Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Syntax.Minimalism.Tense.Zeijlstra

@cite{zeijlstra-2012}: SOT as Upward Agree #

@cite{chomsky-2000} @cite{zeijlstra-2012}

Zeijlstra's theory: Sequence of Tense is syntactic concord, structurally parallel to Negative Concord. Subordinate past morphemes carry uninterpretable [uPAST]; they Agree upward with matrix [iPAST]. The subordinate verb's past morphology is semantically vacuous -- it is Agree spell-out, not semantic past.

Core Mechanisms #

  1. Tense feature interpretability: [iPAST] contributes past semantics; [uPAST] is checked by Agree, semantically vacuous
  2. Upward Agree: the goal c-commands the probe (reverse of standard @cite{chomsky-2000} Agree where probe c-commands goal)
  3. SOT as concord: SOT languages allow [uT] on embedded T; non-SOT languages do not, so embedded tense is always interpretable
  4. Parametric variation: whether a language has SOT = whether it allows uninterpretable tense features on embedded T heads

Derivation Theorems #

Limitations #

Tense feature interpretability. Following @cite{zeijlstra-2012}:

  • Interpretable [iPAST]: contributes past semantics
  • Uninterpretable [uPAST]: checked by Agree, semantically vacuous
Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A tense head with its feature specification.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            Equations
            Instances For

              Is a tense head semantically active? Only interpretable features contribute to meaning.

              Equations
              Instances For

                Zeijlstra's upward Agree: the goal c-commands the probe. Standard Agree: probe c-commands goal. Zeijlstra: reverse -- [uF] is valued by a c-commanding [iF].

                This is the key innovation: the c-command direction is reversed. The uninterpretable feature (probe) sits low in the structure and is valued by a c-commanding interpretable feature (goal).

                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Upward Agree makes the probe semantically vacuous: since the probe's feature is uninterpretable, it does not contribute to LF interpretation.

                    The goal's tense IS semantically active.

                    SOT configuration: [iPAST] > [uPAST] > [uPAST] (@cite{zeijlstra-2012}, ex. 22--23).

                    In an SOT language, the matrix T carries [iPAST] (the only semantically active past), and all embedded T heads carry [uPAST] (semantically vacuous, valued by upward Agree with [iPAST]).

                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        In an SOT configuration, only the matrix T contributes past semantics. All embedded past morphology is concord (semantically vacuous).

                        Whether a language allows uninterpretable tense on embedded T. SOT languages (English): yes → simultaneous reading available. Non-SOT languages (Japanese): no → all tense is interpretable.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Zeijlstra derives the simultaneous reading: [uPAST] is semantically vacuous → the embedded clause has no independent past semantics → it is interpreted at the matrix event time → R' = P' (simultaneous).

                          Concretely: the embedded frame with a vacuous [uPAST] has R' = P' = matrix E, which is simultaneousFrame.

                          theorem Minimalism.Tense.Zeijlstra.zeijlstra_derives_shifted {Time : Type u_1} [LinearOrder Time] (matrixFrame : Core.Reichenbach.ReichenbachFrame Time) (embeddedR embeddedE : Time) (embeddedT : TenseHead) (h_i : embeddedT.status = TenseFeatureStatus.interpretable) (h_past : embeddedT.tense = Core.Tense.GramTense.past) (h_shifted : embeddedR < matrixFrame.eventTime) :
                          embeddedT.isSemanticallyActive = true (Semantics.Tense.shiftedFrame matrixFrame embeddedR embeddedE).isPast

                          Zeijlstra derives the shifted reading: When embedded T has [iPAST] (independent tense, no Agree), it contributes genuine past semantics → R' < P' (shifted).

                          SOT is parametric: SOT languages allow [uT] on embedded T; non-SOT languages do not. This bridges Zeijlstra's feature-based account to the SOTParameter type.

                          Upward Agree explains the directionality: embedded tense depends on matrix (not reverse) because [uPAST] must be c-commanded by [iPAST]. The c-command relation is asymmetric: matrix c-commands embedded.

                          The structural parallel between SOT and Negative Concord.

                          Just as Negative Concord languages have [uNEG] on n-words that Agree with [iNEG] on the sentential negation, SOT languages have [uPAST] on embedded T heads that Agree with [iPAST] on matrix T.

                          Both involve:

                          • One interpretable feature (semantically active)
                          • Multiple uninterpretable copies (concord, semantically vacuous)
                          • Upward Agree as the licensing mechanism
                          • iFeatureBearer : String

                            The interpretable feature bearer

                          • uFeatureBearers : List String

                            The uninterpretable concord items

                          • domain : String

                            The domain

                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              SOT as tense concord.

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Negative Concord parallel.

                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Map a TenseHead to the Minimalism Agree infrastructure. An interpretable [iPAST] maps to GramFeature.valued (.tense true); an uninterpretable [uPAST] maps to GramFeature.unvalued (.tense true).

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    Agree-valued [uPAST] produces the same Reichenbach frame as simultaneousFrame: the embedded tense contributes no independent temporal ordering, so R' = P' = matrix E.

                                    Size-Sensitive SOT #

                                    @cite{egressy-2026} shows that Hungarian is a partial SOT language: the simultaneous reading is available in TP complements but blocked in CP complements. This follows from PIC blocking upward Agree for [uPAST] across the CP phase boundary.

                                    The key insight: Zeijlstra's UpwardAgree succeeds only when no phase boundary intervenes between probe ([uPAST] on embedded T) and goal ([iPAST] on matrix T). CP is a phase (Phase.lean), so [uPAST] inside a CP complement cannot reach matrix [iPAST].

                                    Available embedded tense readings given complement size.

                                    In a size-sensitive SOT language:

                                    • Small complements (< CP): both shifted and simultaneous
                                    • Large complements (≥ CP): shifted only (simultaneous blocked)
                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      The Williams Cycle #

                                      The Williams Cycle is the diachronic process by which formerly transparent clause boundaries become opaque. A language at stage N of the cycle has some complement types that are transparent to tense Agree and others that are opaque.

                                      @cite{egressy-2026} argues Hungarian is at Stage 1: mid-cycle, with the CP boundary having become opaque while TP remains transparent.

                                      Williams Cycle stage for SOT.

                                      Classifies a language by how many complement boundaries are transparent to upward tense Agree.

                                      Instances For
                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          Bridge to SOTParameter: full SOT =.relative, no SOT =.absolute. Partial SOT has no SOTParameter equivalent — it is genuinely a third option that the binary parameter cannot express.

                                          @cite{zeijlstra-2012} identity card, extended with @cite{egressy-2026} size-sensitive SOT prediction.

                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For