Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Syntax.Minimalism.Formal.HeadMovement.VerbMovement

Verb Movement Parameter #

@cite{chomsky-1995} @cite{pollock-1989}

@cite{pollock-1989} established that languages differ parametrically in whether lexical verbs raise to T (Inflection). French lexical verbs obligatorily raise past negation, adverbs, and floating quantifiers; English lexical verbs remain in situ. English auxiliaries, however, do raise — patterning with French lexical verbs rather than English lexical verbs.

This asymmetry explains do-support: when T must be realized high (in C for questions, above negation) but the lexical verb cannot raise, a dummy 'do' is inserted to host tense features.

The Four Diagnostics #

Pollock identifies four positions that diagnose V-raising:

  1. Negation: V > Neg (French) vs. *V > Neg (English)
  2. Adverbs: V > Adv (French) vs. *V > Adv (English)
  3. Floating quantifiers: V > FQ (French) vs. *V > FQ (English)
  4. Subject inversion: V-Subj (French) vs. *V-Subj (English lexical V)

All four converge: a language either raises V past all four, or past none.

The verb movement parameter: does V raise to T?

  • raises : VMovementParam

    V raises to T (French lexical verbs, English auxiliaries)

  • inSitu : VMovementParam

    V stays in situ below T (English lexical verbs)

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Pollock's four diagnostics for verb position relative to T.

      • negation : VDiagnostic

        Does V precede sentential negation?

      • adverb : VDiagnostic

        Does V precede VP-adverbs (e.g., 'often', 'souvent')?

      • floatingQ : VDiagnostic

        Does V precede floating quantifiers (e.g., 'all', 'tous')?

      • inversion : VDiagnostic

        Can V invert with the subject (V-to-C via T)?

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Prediction: does V precede the diagnostic position?

          If V raises to T, it precedes all four diagnostic positions (negation, adverbs, floating quantifiers, and can reach C for inversion). If V stays in situ, it follows all four.

          Equations
          Instances For

            Contexts where tense features need overt support in T/C position.

            When V cannot raise to T (English lexical verbs), these contexts require do-insertion because tense must be realized above VP.

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Does this parameter setting require do-support in the given context?

                Do-support is needed exactly when V is in situ: T cannot lower to V (blocked by the intervening material), so a dummy 'do' hosts tense.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  French lexical verbs raise to T.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    English auxiliaries raise to T — patterning with French, not with English lexical verbs. This is Pollock's key observation.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      V-raising languages: V precedes all four diagnostic positions.

                      V-in-situ languages: V follows all four diagnostic positions.

                      English auxiliaries have the same movement parameter as French lexical verbs. This is Pollock's central observation: the aux/lexical split in English mirrors the English/French split.

                      V-raising languages never need do-support.

                      V-in-situ languages always need do-support.

                      All four diagnostics converge for any parameter setting: they either all return true (raises) or all return false (inSitu).

                      Do-support and verb raising are perfectly anticorrelated: do-support is needed iff V does not precede negation.