The semantic type associated with a projection level (Grimshaw §1.5). EP levels map systematically to semantic types:
- F0 heads denote properties ⟨e,t⟩ (V = event predicates, N = entity predicates)
- Higher functional heads progressively bind variables
- The top of a verbal EP denotes a proposition ⟨s,t⟩
- The top of a nominal EP denotes an entity (e)
- property : EPSemanticType
- proposition : EPSemanticType
- entity : EPSemanticType
- intermediate : EPSemanticType
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- Minimalism.instBEqEPSemanticType.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
Map categories to their EP semantic type. This reflects how functional structure progressively changes the denotation from ⟨e,t⟩ to a closed type.
Equations
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.V = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.property
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.N = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.property
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.A = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.property
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.P = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.property
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Place = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Path = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.v = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.n = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.a = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Voice = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Appl = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Num = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Q = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.D = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.entity
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.T = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Neg = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Mod = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Pol = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Asp = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Evid = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Foc = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Top = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Rel = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Fin = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.intermediate
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.C = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.proposition
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.Force = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.proposition
- Minimalism.epSemanticType Minimalism.Cat.SA = Minimalism.EPSemanticType.proposition
Instances For
Only L-heads (F0 = lexical categories) assign theta roles. Functional heads (v, D, T, C) do not introduce new theta roles — they provide functional structure (agreement, tense, force, determination).
@cite{grimshaw-2005} Definition 10: theta-role assignment is restricted to the lexical level of projection.
Equations
Instances For
Theta assignment is exactly the lexical heads.
A daughter is EP-internal (complement) if it shares [±V, ±N] features with its parent AND has a strictly lower F-value.
EP-internal elements are inside the extended projection:
- VP is EP-internal to vP (both verbal, F0 < F1)
- NP is EP-internal to DP (both nominal, F0 < F1)
EP-external elements (specifiers) are outside:
- DP in Spec-vP is EP-external (nominal ≠ verbal)
Equations
- Minimalism.isEPInternal daughter parent = (Minimalism.categoryConsistent daughter parent && decide (Minimalism.fValue daughter < Minimalism.fValue parent))
Instances For
EP-external: either different family or not lower F-value. Specifiers are typically EP-external to the projection they sit.
Equations
- Minimalism.isEPExternal daughter parent = !Minimalism.isEPInternal daughter parent
Instances For
Full verbal EP: V → v → T → C. This is the standard clausal spine for finite clauses.
Equations
Instances For
Full nominal EP: N → n → Q → Num → D. Q (classifier / individuation) is below Num (number / counting) per @cite{borer-2005}: individuation must precede counting.
Equations
Instances For
Small clause EP: just the lexical head, no functional layers. E.g., "consider [SC him intelligent]" — the SC has no T or C.
Instances For
Adjectival EP: A → a. The minimal adjectival extended projection, parallel to the verbal (V → v) and nominal (N → n) categorizer layers. Further adjectival functional structure (DegP, etc.) is language-dependent and not included here.
Instances For
Adjectival small clause EP: just A. E.g., "consider [SC him happy]"
Instances For
Locational adpositional EP: P → Place. @cite{dendikken-2010}: locational PPs project PlaceP but not PathP. E.g., Dutch preP op de heuvel 'on the hill' (locational).
Instances For
Directional adpositional EP: P → Place → Path. @cite{dendikken-2010}: directional PPs project PathP above PlaceP. E.g., Dutch postP de heuvel op 'onto the hill' (directional).
Instances For
Infinitival EP: V → v → T (no C). E.g., "want [to leave]" — truncated at T, no complementizer.
Instances For
Is this EP truncated (missing functional layers compared to the full EP)?
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The highest F-value that still denotes a property ⟨e,t⟩ or is in the intermediate zone. This defines the argument domain boundary.
For verbal EPs: the argument domain extends to vP (F1)
- vP still denotes ⟨e,t⟩ (property of events)
- TP (F2) starts binding tense → no longer ⟨e,t⟩
For nominal EPs: the argument domain extends to nP (F1)
- nP still denotes ⟨e,t⟩ (property of entities)
- NumP (F2) starts binding number → no longer ⟨e,t⟩ This parallels the verbal domain: v ↔ n at the same F-level.
Equations
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.C = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Force = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Fin = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Foc = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Top = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Rel = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.SA = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.T = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Neg = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Mod = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Pol = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Asp = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Evid = Minimalism.Cat.v
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.D = Minimalism.Cat.n
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Q = Minimalism.Cat.n
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat Minimalism.Cat.Num = Minimalism.Cat.n
- Minimalism.argumentDomainCat topCat = topCat
Instances For
Is a category within the argument domain of a given top category? The argument domain includes all F-levels ≤ the boundary.
Equations
- Minimalism.isInArgumentDomain c topCat = decide (Minimalism.fValue c ≤ Minimalism.fValue (Minimalism.argumentDomainCat topCat))
Instances For
v denotes an intermediate type (event quantification domain).
C denotes a proposition (clausal force).
D denotes an entity (determination/referentiality).
Nominal categorizer n is intermediate (still ⟨e,t⟩-ish).
Q is intermediate (classifier/individuation: CUM → QUA).
Num is intermediate (number/counting: QUA → measured).
All lexical heads denote properties.
VP is EP-internal to vP (complement position).
NP is EP-internal to nP (complement of categorizer).
nP is EP-internal to QP (complement of classifier/individuation).
QP is EP-internal to NumP (complement of number/counting).
NumP is EP-internal to DP (complement of determiner).
NP is EP-internal to DP (transitively).
DP is EP-external to vP (specifier position): different [±V, ±N] features (nominal ≠ verbal).
The argument domain of a full clause (C) is vP.
The argument domain of a TP is also vP.
The argument domain of a full DP is nP (parallel to vP for clauses).
The argument domain of QP is nP.
The argument domain of NumP is nP.
V is within the argument domain of a full clause.
v is within the argument domain of a full clause.
T is NOT within the argument domain of a full clause.
C is NOT within the argument domain (it's the top).
Full verbal EP is well-formed: consistent and monotone.
Full nominal EP is well-formed: consistent and monotone.
Adjectival EP is well-formed: consistent and monotone.
Infinitival EP is well-formed.
A small clause is truncated relative to a full verbal EP.
A full verbal EP is not truncated.
F1+ heads cannot assign theta roles (@cite{grimshaw-2005} Definition 10). Note: Panagiotidis (2015 §4.5) argues categorizers (v, n, a) are lexical, not functional — but in Grimshaw's F-value system they are F1 (non-lexical). The theta restriction here follows Grimshaw, not Panagiotidis.
Lexical heads can assign theta roles.
Place and Path are functional heads: they do NOT assign theta roles.
P is EP-internal to PlaceP: same [-V,-N], F0 < F1. @cite{dendikken-2010}: P is the lexical complement of Place.
PlaceP is EP-internal to PathP: same [-V,-N], F1 < F2. @cite{dendikken-2010}: Place is the complement of Path in directional PPs.
Locational PP EP is well-formed: consistent and monotone.
Directional PP EP is well-formed: consistent and monotone.
A locational PP [P, Place] is truncated relative to the full adpositional EP [P, Place, Path]. @cite{dendikken-2010}: locational PPs lack the directional PathP layer.
The split-CP spine is well-formed (consistent and monotone).
Fin is EP-internal to Foc: same [+V,-N], F3 < F4. The IP/CP boundary (Fin) is properly dominated by focus.
Foc is EP-internal to Top: same [+V,-N], F4 < F5. Focus is below topic in the C-domain hierarchy.
Top is EP-internal to C: same [+V,-N], F5 < F6. Topic is below the complementizer (= Force in unsplit contexts).
T is EP-internal to Fin: same [+V,-N], F2 < F3. Tense is properly dominated by finiteness.
Fin and Foc are NOT perfect projections of each other: F3 ≠ F4. Before the fValue fix, both had fValue 3 and this was incorrectly true.