The P-Constraint: Person Hierarchy Effects via Point-of-View #
@cite{pancheva-zubizarreta-2018}
@cite{pancheva-zubizarreta-2018} (P&Z) attribute PCC effects to the encoding of point-of-view centers within a phase defined by an argument-introducing verbal head (Appl). Their P-Constraint has four parametric components:
- Domain of application: the interpretable person feature is present on all Appl heads (default), or only on those whose phase contains a [+author]-marked DP (restricted).
- P-Prominence: an n-valued D at the phase edge must enter an Agree relation with the interpretable person feature. n is [+PROXIMATE] (default), restricted to [+PARTICIPANT] or [+AUTHOR].
- P-Uniqueness: at most one DP in α can agree with the interpretable person feature (default: active).
- P-Primacy: if P-Uniqueness is active and multiple DPs can agree, the [+AUTHOR] DP takes priority (default: inactive).
Contextual Proximate Marking #
SAPs are inherently [+PROXIMATE]. 3P arguments are [-PROXIMATE] by default but can be contextually marked [+PROXIMATE] when co-occurring with another 3P in the same Appl domain. This contextual mechanism applies ONLY to the [+PROXIMATE] prominence setting — [+PARTICIPANT] and [+AUTHOR] are inherent features with no contextual variant.
PCC Typology #
| Variety | P-Prominence | P-Uniqueness | P-Primacy | Domain | Licit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong | +proximate | active | inactive | all (dflt) | 3 |
| Ultra-strong | +proximate | active | active | all | 5 |
| Weak | +proximate | inactive | (n/a) | all | 7 |
| Super-strong | +participant | active | inactive | all | 2 |
| Me-first | +author | active | inactive | restricted | 6 |
Whether a DP is inherently [+PROXIMATE]. SAPs are inherently [+PROXIMATE]; 3P is not (requires contextual marking).
Equations
Instances For
P-Prominence settings: what feature value the interpretable person feature on Appl requires for Agree.
Correspond to logophoric roles (Sells 1987):
.proximate→ pivot (default, least restrictive).participant→ self (attitude holder).author→ source (most restrictive)
- proximate : PProminence
- participant : PProminence
- author : PProminence
Instances For
Equations
- Minimalism.PConstraint.instBEqPProminence.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Does a DP inherently satisfy the P-Prominence condition?
Equations
- Minimalism.PConstraint.satisfiesProminence Minimalism.PConstraint.PProminence.proximate p = (Minimalism.decomposePerson p).hasProximate
- Minimalism.PConstraint.satisfiesProminence Minimalism.PConstraint.PProminence.participant p = (Minimalism.decomposePerson p).hasParticipant
- Minimalism.PConstraint.satisfiesProminence Minimalism.PConstraint.PProminence.author p = (Minimalism.decomposePerson p).hasAuthor
Instances For
A PCC grammar is parameterized by four settings of the P-Constraint.
- prominence : PProminence
P-Prominence: what person feature the IO must satisfy. Default:
proximate. - uniqueness : Bool
P-Uniqueness: at most one DP can agree with the interpretable person feature. Default:
true(active). - primacy : Bool
P-Primacy: when both DPs satisfy P-Prominence, the [+author] DP takes priority as IO. Conditional on P-Uniqueness. Default:
false(inactive). - restrictedDomain : Bool
Domain: whether the interpretable person feature is present on ALL Appl heads (false = default) or only when a [+author] DP is present (true = restricted).
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Minimalism.PConstraint.instBEqPCCGrammar.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Strong PCC: all defaults. DO must be 3P.
Equations
Instances For
Ultra-strong PCC: P-Primacy active. Allows ⟨1,2⟩ but not ⟨2,1⟩.
Equations
- Minimalism.PConstraint.ultraStrongGrammar = { primacy := true }
Instances For
Weak PCC: P-Uniqueness inactive. Allows SAP co-occurrence.
Equations
- Minimalism.PConstraint.weakGrammar = { uniqueness := false }
Instances For
Super-strong PCC: [+participant] prominence. IO must be SAP.
Equations
Instances For
Me-first PCC: [+author] prominence, restricted domain.
Equations
- Minimalism.PConstraint.meFirstGrammar = { prominence := Minimalism.PConstraint.PProminence.author, restrictedDomain := true }
Instances For
PG1 (predicted): [+participant] + P-Primacy.
Equations
- Minimalism.PConstraint.pg1Grammar = { prominence := Minimalism.PConstraint.PProminence.participant, primacy := true }
Instances For
PG2 (predicted): [+participant], no P-Uniqueness.
Equations
- Minimalism.PConstraint.pg2Grammar = { prominence := Minimalism.PConstraint.PProminence.participant, uniqueness := false }
Instances For
PG3 (predicted): [+author], unrestricted domain.
Equations
Instances For
Is a ditransitive clitic combination licit under a given PCC grammar?
ioPerson and doPerson are the interpretable person values.
The logic:
- Domain: if restricted and no [+author] DP present, P-Constraint does not apply.
- P-Prominence: IO must satisfy the prominence condition. For [+proximate], a 3P IO can satisfy contextually when paired with another 3P (contextual proximate marking). For [+participant] and [+author], satisfaction is inherent only.
- P-Uniqueness: if active, at most one DP may inherently satisfy the prominence condition. Contextually-marked 3P IOs don't trigger this (the DO in ⟨3,3⟩ stays [-proximate]).
- P-Primacy: when P-Uniqueness is violated, if the IO is [+author], it takes priority and the violation is rescued.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Ultra-strong allows ⟨1,2⟩: P-Primacy rescues (1P is [+author]).
Ultra-strong bans ⟨2,1⟩: 2P IO lacks [+author], no P-Primacy rescue.
Super-strong bans ⟨3,3⟩: 3P IO is not [+participant].
Strong PCC entails Weak PCC: anything licit under strong is licit under weak. (Strong is strictly more restrictive.)
Strong PCC entails Ultra-strong PCC: anything licit under strong is licit under ultra-strong. (Ultra-strong adds P-Primacy, which only rescues — never bans — so it is less restrictive.)
Count licit combinations (out of 9 = 3×3).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Count parameter departures from the default (strong PCC).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Strong PCC is the default (0 departures).
Ultra-strong and weak each have 1 departure.
Me-first has 2 departures (prominence + domain).
A polite pronoun with interpretable 2nd person is inherently [+PROXIMATE], triggering PCC effects in DO position.
PCC effect with polite pronoun in DO, 3rd person IO (Weak PCC).
Morphosyntactic accounts evaluate agreement person (3rd) → licit.
Me-first grammar cannot exhibit *<3,3> effects: the domain restriction exempts ⟨3,3⟩ combinations entirely.