Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Syntax.Minimalism.Core.Multidominance

Multidominance #

@cite{citko-2014}

Multiply dominated structures: syntactic objects shared between two or more dominating nodes. A node is multiply dominated when it has more than one mother — it is built once but structurally accessible from multiple positions.

Two PF Reduction Mechanisms #

Natural languages have two independent ways to arrive at PF-reduced representations (material interpreted but not pronounced):

Both yield the same surface effect — PF reduction — but differ in derivational cost. MD typically uses fewer Merge operations and fewer lexical resources because the shared material is constructed once rather than twice.

Sharing Types #

Representation #

Since SyntacticObject is a tree (each node has exactly one parent), multiply dominated nodes cannot be represented directly in the tree type. Instead, we model MD as a property of COORDINATION structures: a SharedNode records that a node occurring in two conjuncts is structurally identical — built once and shared rather than duplicated.

Connection to Position-Indexed Maximality #

Formal/HeadMovement/Basic.lean defines position-indexed maximality (isMaximalAtPosition) precisely to handle multidominance: the same element can be maximal at its derived position (Spec) while projecting at its base position (VP). The types here complement that treatment by modeling the coordination-level sharing structure.

The two mechanisms of PF reduction.

Both produce representations where material is interpreted but not pronounced. Economy governs the choice between them.

  • ellipsis : PFReductionMechanism

    E-feature on a functional head triggers deletion of its complement at PF. The deleted material is built in full during the derivation.

  • multidominance : PFReductionMechanism

    A syntactic object is built once and shared between two dominating nodes. Pronounced at one position only.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      How material is shared between conjuncts in an MD structure.

      The distinction is empirically motivated: coordinated wh-questions use non-bulk-sharing (individual heads shared), while coordinated sluices use bulk-sharing (entire C' shared). The two sharing types derive different syntactic and interpretive properties.

      • nonBulk : SharingType

        Individual functional heads shared between conjuncts. Each conjunct remains a separate full phrase; only specific heads (e.g., C, T) are multiply dominated.

      • bulk : SharingType

        An entire constituent is shared between conjuncts. Both conjuncts dominate the same subtree, so they share all material inside it (C, TP, vP, VP, ...).

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          A node shared between two conjuncts in a coordination structure.

          The shared node is built once but is structurally accessible from both parent1 and parent2. At PF, it is linearized once.

          • The multiply dominated node

          • category : Option Cat

            Category of the shared node (if it has a label)

          • pronounced : Bool

            The shared node is pronounced (has PF content)

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              A coordination structure with PF reduction.

              Models a coordinate &P where material is either multiply dominated (shared between conjuncts) or elided by an E-feature.

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Does this coordination use both MD and ellipsis?

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    The Multiple Wh-Fronting (MWF) parameter.

                    Languages vary in whether multiple wh-specifiers at a phase edge are tolerable at PF:

                    • MWF languages (e.g., Bulgarian, Romanian): a phase node with multiple wh-specifiers does NOT receive an asterisk at PF.
                    • Non-MWF languages (e.g., English, German, Greek): a phase node with multiple wh-specifiers receives an asterisk, which is uninterpretable at PF, crashing the derivation.

                    In non-MWF languages, structures with multiple wh-specifiers at a phase edge are only grammatical if the offending edge is deleted by ellipsis before PF interprets the asterisk.

                    • allowsMWF : Bool

                      Does this language allow multiple wh-fronting?

                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        Instances For
                          def Minimalism.mwfViolation (param : MWFParameter) (numWhSpecifiers : ) :

                          A phase edge has a MWF violation when it contains multiple wh-specifiers in a non-MWF language.

                          Equations
                          Instances For
                            def Minimalism.ellipsisRepairsMWF (param : MWFParameter) (numWhSpecs : ) (edgeDeleted : Bool) :

                            Ellipsis can repair a MWF violation by deleting the phase edge containing the offending multiple wh-specifiers.

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              No repair is needed if the language allows MWF.

                              A single wh-specifier never causes a MWF violation.

                              Zero wh-specifiers never cause a MWF violation.