Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Syntax.DependencyGrammar.Formal.Ellipsis

Ellipsis as Catena-Targeting #

@cite{osborne-2019} @cite{osborne-gross-2012}

Formalizes @cite{osborne-2019}'s thesis: ellipsis targets catenae, not constituents. This is the primary empirical motivation for the catena concept — it explains why VP ellipsis, gapping, pseudogapping, sluicing, stripping, and fragment answers all elide connected-but-not-necessarily-complete-subtree material.

Key Insight #

In DG, the "VP" is NOT a complete subtree (constituent) because the verb's subject is also its dependent. This means even VP ellipsis targets a catena, not a constituent — making catenae essential.

Bridges #

Ellipsis types in English (@cite{osborne-2019}, Ch 12–13).

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      VP Ellipsis: "She will cook dinner, and he will too" Pre-ellipsis second clause: cook(0) → he(1:nsubj), will(2:aux), dinner(3:obj). Elided = {0, 3} (cook + dinner): connected via obj → catena. Subtree of cook = {0,1,2,3} ≠ {0,3} → NOT constituent. @cite{osborne-2019}.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Elided nodes in VP ellipsis: {cook, dinner} = {0, 3}.

        Equations
        Instances For

          Gapping: "Fred eats beans and Jim rice" Pre-ellipsis second clause: eats(0) → Jim(1:nsubj), rice(2:obj). Elided = {0} (eats only): singleton → catena. Subtree of eats = {0,1,2} ≠ {0} → NOT constituent. @cite{osborne-2019}.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Elided nodes in gapping: {eats} = {0}.

            Equations
            Instances For

              Pseudogapping: "She has helped him, and he has her too" Pre-ellipsis: helped(0) → he(1:nsubj), has(2:aux), her(3:obj), too(4:advmod). Elided = {0} (helped only): singleton → catena, NOT constituent. @cite{osborne-2019}.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Elided nodes in pseudogapping: {helped} = {0}.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Sluicing: "She helped someone, but I don't know who" Embedded clause (pre-ellipsis): helped(0) → she(1:nsubj), someone(2:obj). Elided = {0, 1} (helped + she): connected via nsubj → catena. Subtree of helped = {0,1,2} ≠ {0,1} → NOT constituent. @cite{osborne-2019}.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Elided nodes in sluicing: {helped, she} = {0, 1}.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Fragment answer: "Who helped? — Him." Full answer: helped(0) → him(1:obj). Elided = {0} (helped): singleton → catena, NOT constituent. @cite{osborne-2019}.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Elided nodes in fragment answer: {helped} = {0}.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          VP ellipsis elided material is NOT a constituent (not a complete subtree).

                          @cite{osborne-2019}: ALL five ellipsis types target non-constituent catenae. This is the empirical advantage of catenae over constituents: a constituent-based theory cannot capture these ellipsis patterns.