Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Syntax.ConstructionGrammar.Studies.GoldbergShirtz2025

@cite{goldberg-shirtz-2025}: PAL Constructions — Theoretical Analysis #

@cite{goldberg-shirtz-2025}

Formalizes the PAL (Phrasal Adjective-Like) construction and its inheritance network using Construction Grammar types from ConstructionGrammar.Basic.

PALs are phrases that fill word-level syntactic slots (e.g., "a grab-and-go lunch", "a must-see movie"). Their key theoretical properties:

  1. Form motivates function: A phrase in a word slot gets lemma-like interpretation — the PAL names a situation type rather than describing it.
  2. Familiarity presupposition: PALs presuppose the situation type is in the common ground (Studies 1a/1b).
  3. Two-dimensional meaning: At-issue content (head noun denotation) + CI content (social signaling: wit, sarcasm).
  4. Inheritance network: PALs inherit from both NN compounds (stress, no plural on modifier) and Adj+N constructions (prenominal position).

Section 1: PAL Construction definitions #

The PAL construction: a phrase fills a word-level modifier slot.

Form: [N' PAL⁰ N] — a phrasal expression occupies a head/modifier position that normally expects a single word.

Meaning: The PAL names a familiar situation type, presupposing shared knowledge of that type.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    must-VERB subtype: "a must-see movie", "a must-read book".

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      a simple ⟨PAL⟩ subtype: "a simple meet-and-greet".

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Don't PAL me: "Don't wink-wink me".

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          the old ⟨PAL⟩ N: "the old bait-and-switch trick".

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            NN compound construction (parent of PAL for stress/morphology).

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Adjective + Noun modification construction (parent for position).

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Inheritance network (Figure 5 of @cite{goldberg-shirtz-2025}) #

                The PAL constructicon: constructions + inheritance links.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Section 2: Presupposition bridge #

                  Connect PAL's familiarity presupposition to Core.Presupposition and Core.CommonGround infrastructure.

                  PAL presupposes the situation type is in the common ground.

                  The presupposition is the situation type proposition itself: if the PAL is "grab-and-go", the presupposition is that grab-and-go situations are a recognized category for both speaker and addressee.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    PAL two-dimensional meaning (@cite{potts-2005} two-dimensional semantics).

                    • At-issue: the head noun's denotation (e.g., "lunch" in "grab-and-go lunch")
                    • CI: speaker presupposes shared familiarity with the situation type

                    This connects PAL semantics to the existing TwoDimProp from Semantics.Lexical.Expressives.Basic.

                    Equations
                    Instances For
                      theorem ConstructionGrammar.Studies.GoldbergShirtz2025.pal_presup_satisfied_by_cg (W : Type u_1) (situationType : BProp W) (c : Core.CommonGround.ContextSet W) (h : c situationType) (w : W) :
                      c w(palPresupposition W situationType).presup w = true

                      When the situation type is in the common ground, the PAL's presupposition is satisfied.

                      theorem ConstructionGrammar.Studies.GoldbergShirtz2025.pal_ci_projects_through_neg (W : Type u_1) (atIssue familiar : BProp W) :
                      (palTwoDim W atIssue familiar).neg.ci = familiar

                      PAL CI projects through negation (inherits from TwoDimProp).

                      "It's not a grab-and-go lunch" still conveys familiarity with grab-and-go.

                      Section 3: Core theoretical claims #

                      State the paper's central claims as propositions. These connect the empirical data (in Phenomena/) to the theoretical analysis.

                      Claim 1: PAL form motivates PAL function.

                      A phrase filling a word-level slot gets lemma-like interpretation: the PAL names a situation type rather than compositionally describing it. This is a form-function correlation at the heart of CxG.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Claim 2: PALs presuppose the situation type is common knowledge.

                        Supported by Studies 1a (common knowledge) and 1b (shared background): PALs are preferred when the situation type is mutually known.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For