@cite{deal-2020}: Counterfactual Tense and the Upper Limit Constraint #
@cite{deal-2020} @cite{iatridou-2000}
Deal's theory: past morphology in counterfactuals encodes modal distance, not temporal precedence. This explains why counterfactual "were" does not locate events in the past ("If I were rich..." is about the present).
Core Mechanisms #
- Counterfactual distance: past morphology marks modal remoteness from actuality, not temporal precedence
- ULC refinement: the Upper Limit Constraint holds for temporal tense but not for counterfactual tense (which is not truly temporal)
Key Innovation #
Abusch's ULC says embedded R ≤ matrix E. But counterfactuals violate this: "If I were rich, I would buy a house" — the "were" does not refer to a time before the attitude event. Deal resolves this by distinguishing temporal tense (subject to ULC) from counterfactual tense (exempt from ULC).
The two uses of past morphology, following @cite{iatridou-2000}.
Past morphology is ambiguous between:
- Temporal precedence (genuine past tense)
- Modal remoteness (counterfactual distance from actuality)
Iatridou's "exclusion feature": past morphology marks exclusion from the set of relevant times/worlds. Temporal past excludes present times; counterfactual past excludes actual worlds.
- temporal : PastMorphologyUse
Temporal: precedence on the time line
- counterfactual : PastMorphologyUse
Counterfactual: distance from actuality
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Semantics.Tense.Deal.instBEqPastMorphologyUse.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Counterfactual distance: past morphology marks modal remoteness, not temporal precedence. The "reference world" is remote from the actual world.
- actual : World
The actual world
- counterfactual : World
The counterfactual world
The worlds are distinct (modal distance > 0)
Instances For
Deal's refined ULC: the upper limit constraint applies only to temporal tense, not to counterfactual tense.
If the past morphology is temporal, ULC holds (R ≤ E_matrix). If the past morphology is counterfactual, ULC does not apply.
Equations
- Semantics.Tense.Deal.refinedULC Semantics.Tense.Deal.PastMorphologyUse.temporal embeddedR matrixE = Semantics.Tense.upperLimitConstraint embeddedR matrixE
- Semantics.Tense.Deal.refinedULC Semantics.Tense.Deal.PastMorphologyUse.counterfactual embeddedR matrixE = True
Instances For
Temporal tense is subject to ULC.
Counterfactual tense is exempt from ULC.
Deal derives the counterfactual override: counterfactual morphology is not subject to the ULC, because it doesn't encode temporal precedence.
Deal refines the ULC: it holds for temporal tense but not for counterfactual tense. The temporal and counterfactual uses of past morphology have different formal properties.
The two uses of past morphology are genuinely distinct: temporal tense ≠ counterfactual tense.
@cite{deal-2020} theory identity card.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.