Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus

A world type with Common Ground

  • world : W

    The possible world

  • cg : List (WBool)

    The Common Ground at this world (set of propositions)

Instances For
    @[reducible, inline]

    Epistemic accessibility: worlds compatible with agent's knowledge

    Equations
    Instances For
      @[reducible, inline]

      Conversational accessibility: worlds compatible with agent's conversational goals

      Equations
      Instances For

        Full modal frame for VERUM semantics

        Instances For
          def Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.forSureCG {W : Type u_1} (frame : VerumFrame W) (w : W) (p : WBool) :

          FOR-SURE-CG: The VERUM operator.

          ∀w' ∈ Epi_x(w)[∀w'' ∈ Conv_x(w')[p ∈ CG_w'']]

          For all epistemic alternatives w', for all conversational alternatives w'', p is in the Common Ground at w''.

          This captures: "It is for sure that we should add p to the CG."

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            def Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.verum {W : Type u_1} [DecidableEq W] (cgMembership : W(WBool)Bool) (epiWorlds convWorlds : WList W) (w : W) (p : WBool) :

            Simplified VERUM for finite models

            Equations
            Instances For

              A polar question partition

              • cell1 : WBool

                The two cells of the partition

              • cell2 : WBool
              • pronounced : WBool

                Which cell is "pronounced" (the surface form asks about)

              Instances For

                Standard balanced polar question: {p, ¬p}

                Equations
                Instances For
                  def Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.verumQuestion {W : Type u_1} [DecidableEq W] (cgMembership : W(WBool)Bool) (epiWorlds convWorlds : WList W) (p : WBool) (pronounceNeg : Bool) :

                  Unbalanced VERUM question: {FOR-SURE-CG(p), ¬FOR-SURE-CG(p)}

                  When VERUM is present, the partition is about epistemic commitment to CG membership, not about p's truth directly.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Reading type for negative polar questions

                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        LF structure for negative polar questions

                        Instances For
                          def Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.interpretNegQuestion {W : Type u_1} [DecidableEq W] (cgMembership : W(WBool)Bool) (epiWorlds convWorlds : WList W) (lf : NegQuestionLF W) :

                          Interpret a negative question LF as a partition

                          • PI: {¬FOR-SURE-CG(p), FOR-SURE-CG(p)}
                          • NI: {FOR-SURE-CG(¬p), ¬FOR-SURE-CG(¬p)}
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Speaker's prior epistemic state

                            • beliefWorlds : List W

                              Worlds compatible with speaker's beliefs

                            • believes : (WBool)Bool

                              Does speaker believe p?

                            Instances For

                              Implicature from pronounced cell

                              The pronounced cell of a VERUM question implicates the speaker's prior belief:

                              • PI pronounces ¬FOR-SURE-CG(p) → implicates belief in p
                              • NI pronounces FOR-SURE-CG(¬p) → implicates belief in ¬p
                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Polarity item type

                                Instances For
                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    Ladd's generalization: PPIs → PI, NPIs → NI

                                    Sources that contribute VERUM to the LF

                                    • preposedNegation : VerumSource

                                      Preposed negation: "Doesn't John..."

                                    • reallyAdverb : VerumSource

                                      The adverb "really": "Does John really..."

                                    • auxiliaryFocus : VerumSource

                                      Focus on auxiliary: "DOES John..."

                                    • negationFocus : VerumSource

                                      Focus on negation: "Does John NOT..."

                                    Instances For
                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        Relationship to Polarity.lean #

                                        @cite{romero-han-2004}

                                        Van Rooy & Šafářová (2003) and @cite{romero-han-2004} are complementary:

                                        1. vR&S (Polarity.lean): Explains which polar question to use

                                          • Decision-theoretic: choose question that maximizes expected utility
                                          • Predicts bias based on speaker's credences and stakes
                                        2. R&H (this file): Explains why preposed negation forces bias

                                          • VERUM semantics: preposed negation introduces FOR-SURE-CG
                                          • Explains structural ambiguity (PI vs NI)
                                          • Explains polarity item licensing

                                        Together they explain:

                                        Marker type for cross-theory reference

                                        • decisionTheoreticChoice : Bool

                                          vR&Š explains question choice

                                        • verumSourceOfBias : Bool

                                          R&H explains structural source of bias

                                        Instances For

                                          Example: "Doesn't John drink?" (PI reading)

                                          LF: [Q [not [VERUM [John drinks]]]] Partition: {¬FOR-SURE-CG(drinks(j)), FOR-SURE-CG(drinks(j))} Pronounced: ¬FOR-SURE-CG(drinks(j)) Implicature: Speaker believes John drinks

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            Example: "Doesn't John drink?" (NI reading, with "either")

                                            LF: [Q [VERUM [not [John drinks]]]] Partition: {FOR-SURE-CG(¬drinks(j)), ¬FOR-SURE-CG(¬drinks(j))} Pronounced: FOR-SURE-CG(¬drinks(j)) Implicature: Speaker believes John doesn't drink

                                            Equations
                                            Instances For