Epistemic accessibility: worlds compatible with agent's knowledge
Equations
Instances For
Conversational accessibility: worlds compatible with agent's conversational goals
Equations
Instances For
Full modal frame for VERUM semantics
- worlds : List W
Set of worlds
- epiAccessible : EpistemicAccessibility W
Epistemic accessibility (Epi_x)
- convAccessible : ConversationalAccessibility W
Conversational accessibility (Conv_x)
Common Ground function: for each world, what's in the CG
Instances For
FOR-SURE-CG: The VERUM operator.
∀w' ∈ Epi_x(w)[∀w'' ∈ Conv_x(w')[p ∈ CG_w'']]
For all epistemic alternatives w', for all conversational alternatives w'', p is in the Common Ground at w''.
This captures: "It is for sure that we should add p to the CG."
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Simplified VERUM for finite models
Equations
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.verum cgMembership epiWorlds convWorlds w p = (epiWorlds w).all fun (w' : W) => (convWorlds w').all fun (w'' : W) => cgMembership w'' p
Instances For
Standard balanced polar question: {p, ¬p}
Equations
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.balancedQuestion p = { cell1 := p, cell2 := fun (w : W) => !p w, pronounced := p }
Instances For
Unbalanced VERUM question: {FOR-SURE-CG(p), ¬FOR-SURE-CG(p)}
When VERUM is present, the partition is about epistemic commitment to CG membership, not about p's truth directly.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Reading type for negative polar questions
- PI : NegQuestionReading
- NI : NegQuestionReading
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
LF structure for negative polar questions
- piLF
{W : Type u_1}
: (W → Bool) → NegQuestionLF W
PI: [Q [not [VERUM [p]]]]
- niLF
{W : Type u_1}
: (W → Bool) → NegQuestionLF W
NI: [Q [VERUM [not [p]]]]
Instances For
Extract the embedded proposition
Equations
Instances For
Get the reading type
Equations
Instances For
Interpret a negative question LF as a partition
- PI: {¬FOR-SURE-CG(p), FOR-SURE-CG(p)}
- NI: {FOR-SURE-CG(¬p), ¬FOR-SURE-CG(¬p)}
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Implicature from pronounced cell
The pronounced cell of a VERUM question implicates the speaker's prior belief:
- PI pronounces ¬FOR-SURE-CG(p) → implicates belief in p
- NI pronounces FOR-SURE-CG(¬p) → implicates belief in ¬p
Equations
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.epistemicImplicature Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.NegQuestionReading.PI _p = "Speaker believes p (expected 'yes')"
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.epistemicImplicature Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.NegQuestionReading.NI _p = "Speaker believes ¬p (expected 'no')"
Instances For
Derive the implicature direction
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.instDecidableEqPolarityItem.decEq (Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.PolarityItem.PPI a) (Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.PolarityItem.NPI a_1) = isFalse ⋯
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.instDecidableEqPolarityItem.decEq (Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.PolarityItem.NPI a) (Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.PolarityItem.PPI a_1) = isFalse ⋯
Instances For
Check if polarity item is licensed under a reading
- PPIs licensed under PI reading (in scope of ¬FOR-SURE-CG)
- NPIs licensed under NI reading (in scope of VERUM over negation)
Equations
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.isLicensed (Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.PolarityItem.PPI a) Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.NegQuestionReading.PI = true
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.isLicensed (Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.PolarityItem.NPI a) Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.NegQuestionReading.NI = true
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.isLicensed (Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.PolarityItem.PPI a) Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.NegQuestionReading.NI = false
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.isLicensed (Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.PolarityItem.NPI a) Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.NegQuestionReading.PI = false
Instances For
Common polarity items
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Instances For
Instances For
Ladd's generalization: PPIs → PI, NPIs → NI
Sources that contribute VERUM to the LF
- preposedNegation : VerumSource
Preposed negation: "Doesn't John..."
- reallyAdverb : VerumSource
The adverb "really": "Does John really..."
- auxiliaryFocus : VerumSource
Focus on auxiliary: "DOES John..."
- negationFocus : VerumSource
Focus on negation: "Does John NOT..."
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Does this source necessarily trigger VERUM?
Equations
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.necessarilyTriggersVerum Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.VerumSource.preposedNegation = true
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.necessarilyTriggersVerum Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.VerumSource.reallyAdverb = true
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.necessarilyTriggersVerum Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.VerumSource.auxiliaryFocus = true
- Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.necessarilyTriggersVerum Semantics.Questions.VerumFocus.VerumSource.negationFocus = true
Instances For
Romero & Han's Generalization 1
Relationship to Polarity.lean #
@cite{romero-han-2004}
Van Rooy & Šafářová (2003) and @cite{romero-han-2004} are complementary:
vR&S (Polarity.lean): Explains which polar question to use
- Decision-theoretic: choose question that maximizes expected utility
- Predicts bias based on speaker's credences and stakes
R&H (this file): Explains why preposed negation forces bias
- VERUM semantics: preposed negation introduces FOR-SURE-CG
- Explains structural ambiguity (PI vs NI)
- Explains polarity item licensing
Together they explain:
- WHY certain forms have bias (VERUM)
- WHEN speakers choose biased forms (decision theory)
Example: "Doesn't John drink?" (PI reading)
LF: [Q [not [VERUM [John drinks]]]] Partition: {¬FOR-SURE-CG(drinks(j)), FOR-SURE-CG(drinks(j))} Pronounced: ¬FOR-SURE-CG(drinks(j)) Implicature: Speaker believes John drinks
Equations
Instances For
Example: "Doesn't John drink?" (NI reading, with "either")
LF: [Q [VERUM [not [John drinks]]]] Partition: {FOR-SURE-CG(¬drinks(j)), ¬FOR-SURE-CG(¬drinks(j))} Pronounced: FOR-SURE-CG(¬drinks(j)) Implicature: Speaker believes John doesn't drink