Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Semantics.Questions.AnsweringSystems

Answering System Typology #

@cite{holmberg-2016}

Cross-linguistic variation in how languages answer polar questions.

The Binary Parameter #

@cite{holmberg-2016}'s central typological contribution: languages divide into two types based on what "yes" means in response to a negative question ("Doesn't John drink?"):

Answer Strategy #

Orthogonally, languages vary in whether answers use dedicated particles or echo the finite verb:

Connection to PolP #

In @cite{holmberg-2016}'s syntax, every finite clause has a polarity head (PolP) bearing a valued or unvalued [±Pol] feature. In polar questions, [±Pol] is unvalued — the answer values it. The answering system parameter determines whether "yes" values the variable as [+Pol] (polarity-based) or affirms the question's primary proposition (truth-based).

How a language interprets "yes" in response to negative polar questions.

The diagnostic: "Doesn't John drink?" → "Yes" means...

  • Truth-based: "He doesn't drink" (affirms the proposition)
  • Polarity-based: "He does drink" (assigns positive polarity)
  • truthBased : AnsweringSystem

    "Yes" affirms the proposition in the question (Japanese, Mandarin, Thai, Cantonese)

  • polarityBased : AnsweringSystem

    "Yes" assigns positive polarity (English, Swedish, German, French, Finnish)

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      How a language forms answers to polar questions.

      Orthogonal to AnsweringSystem — either system can combine with either strategy.

      • particle : AnswerStrategy

        Dedicated yes/no particles (English yes/no, Japanese hai/iie)

      • verbEcho : AnswerStrategy

        Echoed finite verb (Finnish juo/ei juo, Welsh ydy/nac ydy)

      • mixed : AnswerStrategy

        Both particle and verb echo available (Swedish ja/nej + verb echo)

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          A language's polar answer profile: answering system + answer strategy.

          • How "yes" is interpreted relative to negative questions

          • strategy : AnswerStrategy

            How answers are formed (particle, verb echo, or both)

          • hasPolarityReversal : Bool

            Does the language have a dedicated polarity-reversing particle (e.g., Swedish jo, German doch, French si)?

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For
                Equations
                Instances For

                  The diagnostic prediction: what does "yes" mean in response to "Doesn't John drink?" under each answering system?

                  Returns the polarity of the proposition expressed by "yes".

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Negation Height and Answering System Derivation #

                    @cite{holmberg-2016} Ch 4.3-4.7 derives the answering system from whether the negation in the question can assign value to the polarity variable [±Pol]. The crucial factor is structural accessibility: if negation is close enough to [±Pol] to value it, the focused answer particle clashes with the inherited negative value → polarity-based. If negation is too distant or not in a c-command relation with [±Pol], the particle freely assigns value → truth-based.

                    This is the book's deepest explanatory contribution: the binary answering-system parameter is not stipulated but derived from independently motivated syntactic variation in negation height.

                    Structural height of sentential negation relative to PolP.

                    Note: this classifies constructions, not languages. A single language may have multiple negation heights (e.g., English has middle by default, low when scoped under an adverb, and high in positively-biased questions).

                    • low : NegationHeight

                      Negation below PolP — VP-internal (Japanese, Mandarin, Thai)

                    • middle : NegationHeight

                      Negation at PolP level — NegP between TP and PolP, or merged with Pol (English default, Swedish, Finnish, German)

                    • high : NegationHeight

                      Negation above PolP — C-domain, scoping over [±Pol] (English -n't in positively-biased questions)

                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Derive the answering system from negation height.

                        Low negation → truth-based: negation scopes below [±Pol], so the question's primary proposition includes negation. "Yes" affirms the (negative) proposition.

                        Middle/high negation → polarity-based: negation is at or above [±Pol], so "yes" values [±Pol] as [+Pol] regardless of negation.

                        Equations
                        Instances For