Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Semantics.PossibilitySemantics.Basic

Possibility Semantics #

@cite{holliday-mandelkern-2024}

Possibility semantics generalizes possible world semantics by replacing maximal possible worlds with partial possibilities ordered by refinement. A possibility can verify a disjunction without verifying either disjunct.

Key differences from possible world semantics #

What validates and what fails #

Validated: excluded middle, non-contradiction, double negation, De Morgan, contraposition. Failed: distributivity — a possibility can verify A ∧ (B ∨ C) without verifying either A ∧ B or A ∧ C. This is the key departure from classical logic and the source of linguistic applications (epistemic contradictions, free choice disjunction).

Architecture #

A compatibility frame: a set of possibilities with a reflexive, symmetric compatibility relation. Two possibilities are compatible if neither settles as true anything the other settles as false. @cite{holliday-mandelkern-2024} Definition 4.1.

Instances For

    Orthocomplement negation. ¬A = {x | ∀y compatible with x, y ∉ A}. A possibility x makes ¬A true iff no compatible possibility makes A true — i.e., x's information settles ¬A. @cite{holliday-mandelkern-2024} Proposition 4.8, eq. (I).

    Equations
    Instances For

      Conjunction is intersection (same as classical).

      Equations
      Instances For

        Disjunction via De Morgan: A ∨ B = ¬(¬A ∧ ¬B). Weaker than set-theoretic union. A possibility x makes A ∨ B true iff every y compatible with x is itself compatible with some z that makes A or B true. @cite{holliday-mandelkern-2024} eq. (II).

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          A set A is ◇-regular iff: whenever x ∉ A, there exists y compatible with x such that all z compatible with y are also not in A. Regularity = "indeterminacy implies compatibility with falsity." Only regular sets count as propositions. @cite{holliday-mandelkern-2024} Definition 4.3.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Refinement: y ⊑ x iff every possibility compatible with y is also compatible with x. A refinement carries at least as much information. @cite{holliday-mandelkern-2024} Lemma 4.4, condition 2.

            Equations
            Instances For

              A world is a possibility that refines everything it is compatible with — the most informative kind of possibility. @cite{holliday-mandelkern-2024} Definition 4.6.

              Equations
              Instances For

                Five possibilities arranged in a path: x₁—x₂—x₃—x₄—x₅. The simplest frame whose ortholattice is non-Boolean. @cite{holliday-mandelkern-2024} Example 4.11, Figure 7.

                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                    The path compatibility frame: adjacent possibilities are compatible.

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Distributivity failure. The key result of possibility semantics. C ∧ (A ∨ B) ≠ (C ∧ A) ∨ (C ∧ B), where C = {x₃}, A = {x₁,x₂}, B = {x₄,x₅}. Possibility x₃ is compatible with both A and B worlds, so it makes A ∨ B true; but it doesn't commit to either disjunct, so neither C ∧ A nor C ∧ B is non-empty. @cite{holliday-mandelkern-2024} Example 4.11, Figure 8.

                      x₁ is a world (maximal possibility).

                      x₃ is NOT a world — it's a partial possibility, compatible with possibilities on both sides without being a refinement of either.

                      theorem Semantics.PossibilitySemantics.orthoNeg_classical {S : Type u_1} [Core.Proposition.FiniteWorlds S] [DecidableEq S] (F : CompatFrame S) (hClassical : ∀ (x y : S), F.compat x y = truex = y) (A : BProp S) (x : S) :
                      orthoNeg F A x = !A x

                      When compatibility is identity (every possibility is a world), orthocomplement reduces to Boolean negation and the ortholattice is Boolean. This is the sense in which possible-world semantics is a special case of possibility semantics. @cite{holliday-mandelkern-2024} Remark 4.9.

                      The identity compatibility frame: compat x y ↔ x = y.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        In the identity frame, orthoNeg is pointwise Boolean negation.