Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Semantics.Modality.Typology

Modal Semantic Universals #

Formalizes the Independence of Force and Flavor (IFF) universal and the Single Axis of Variability (SAV) universal from cross-linguistic modal typology.

Key Definitions #

Key Theorems #

The set of forces expressed by a modal meaning.

Equations
Instances For

    Semantic Universals #

    Independence of Force and Flavor (IFF).

    A modal meaning satisfies IFF iff for any two pairs (fo₁, fl₁) and (fo₂, fl₂) in the meaning, the pair (fo₁, fl₂) is also in the meaning. Equivalently: ⟦m⟧ = fo(m) × fl(m) (Cartesian closure).

    Alternative formulation: a modal m satisfies IFF just in case ⟦m⟧ = fo(m) × fl(m), where × is the Cartesian product.

    Steinert-Threlkeld, Imel, & @cite{steinert-threlkeld-imel-guo-2023}.

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Single Axis of Variability (SAV).

      A modal meaning satisfies SAV iff it exhibits variation along at most one axis of the force-flavor space: either all pairs share the same force, or all pairs share the same flavor.

      [Alternative formulation: |fo(m)| = 1 or |fl(m)| = 1.]

      @cite{nauze-2008}.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Relationship Between Universals #

        SAV is strictly stronger than IFF: every SAV meaning is IFF.

        Proof sketch: If all forces are equal to fo₀ (SAV left disjunct), then for any (fo₁, fl₁) ∈ m and (_, fl₂) ∈ m, fo₁ = fo₀ and the pair (fo₂, fl₂) with flavor fl₂ already has force fo₀ = fo₁, so (fo₁, fl₂) ∈ m. Symmetric for the right disjunct.

        IFF does NOT imply SAV: a meaning can vary on both axes while satisfying IFF. E.g., {(nec,e),(nec,d),(poss,e),(poss,d)} is IFF but not SAV.

        Cartesian Products in the Force-Flavor Space #

        Membership in a Cartesian product: ⟨fo, fl⟩ ∈ fos × fls iff fo ∈ fos ∧ fl ∈ fls.

        Any Cartesian product of forces and flavors satisfies IFF.

        This is the formal content of @cite{kratzer-1981}'s insight that force (quantificational) and flavor (contextual) are independent parameters in the semantics of modals.

        A Cartesian product with a singleton force axis satisfies SAV. Covers fixed-force Kratzer modals (e.g., English "must", "can").

        A Cartesian product with a singleton flavor axis satisfies SAV. Covers variable-force Kratzer modals (e.g., Gitksan ima'a).

        Empty meanings trivially satisfy IFF.

        Language-Level Measures #

        A modal expression datum: a form paired with its meaning in the 3×3 space.

        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Project to the shared modal item core. Register defaults to neutral since typological surveys don't annotate register.

            Equations
            Instances For

              A language's modal inventory.

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Total number of modals in a language.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    IFF degree: fraction of modals satisfying IFF (as a rational). This is the paper's "naturalness" measure.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Whether a language has any synonymous modals (same meaning, different form).

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Fragment Integration #

                        def Semantics.Modality.Typology.ModalInventory.fromAuxEntries {α : Type} (language family source : String) (entries : List α) (form : αString) (meaning : αList Core.Modality.ForceFlavor) :

                        Construct a modal inventory from fragment auxiliary entries. Filters to entries with non-empty modal meanings.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Kratzer-Typology Bridge #

                          Connects Kratzer's parameterized modal semantics (conversational backgrounds, ordering sources) to the typological force-flavor space. A Kratzerian modal with fixed force and contextually variable flavors produces a meaning cartesianProduct [force] flavors, which satisfies both IFF and SAV. Variable-force modals (e.g., Gitksan ima'a) produce cartesianProduct forces [flavor], also satisfying both.

                          A flavor assignment maps each typological ModalFlavor to a Kratzer parameterization (modal base + ordering source).

                          Instances For

                            Canonical assignment from the standard Kratzer flavor structures.

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Bridge: ModalItem.decomposition ↔ satisfiesIFF #

                              ModalItem.decomposition (Core/ModalLogic.lean) and satisfiesIFF (this file) compute the same property through different algorithms:

                              Both reduce to: ∀ fo ∈ forces(m), ∀ fl ∈ flavors(m), ⟨fo, fl⟩ ∈ m.

                              ModalItem.decomposition agrees with satisfiesIFF: a modal is decomposable iff its meaning satisfies IFF.

                              Both sides reduce to checking that m.meaning is closed under force-flavor recombination:

                              • Forward: if the Cartesian product of projected forces/flavors is contained in m.meaning, then for any two pairs (fo₁, fl₁) and (fo₂, fl₂) in m.meaning, (fo₁, fl₂) is in the product (since fo₁ ∈ forces and fl₂ ∈ flavors), hence in m.meaning.
                              • Backward: if IFF holds, take any (fo, fl) in the Cartesian product. Then fo ∈ forces means ∃ (fo, fl₁) ∈ m.meaning, and fl ∈ flavors means ∃ (fo₂, fl) ∈ m.meaning. By IFF closure, (fo, fl) ∈ m.meaning.

                              Corollaries: Decomposability via the Bridge #

                              The equivalence decomposition_eq_satisfiesIFF transfers results freely between the Core structural classifier (ModalItem.decomposition) and the typological universal (satisfiesIFF). The following corollaries make this transfer explicit.

                              Any Kratzer modal — whose meaning is a Cartesian product of forces and flavors — is decomposable. Follows from @cite{kratzer-1981}'s independent parameterization: cartesianProduct_satisfies_iff + bridge.

                              SAV modals are decomposable: if a modal varies on at most one axis, it is decomposable. Follows from sav_implies_iff + bridge.

                              Singleton meanings are decomposable, derived from the IFF universal rather than finite case analysis.

                              Empty meanings are decomposable.

                              A modal is unitary iff its meaning fails IFF. The contrapositive of decomposition_eq_satisfiesIFF.

                              ModalInventory.allIFF is equivalent to checking that every expression is decomposable. Connects the typological survey predicate to the Kratzer-theoretic structural classifier.