Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Semantics.Modality.ProbabilityOrdering

Probability-Ordering Bridge — @cite{kratzer-2012} §2.4 #

Connects probability assignments to Kratzer ordering sources.

A probability assignment P over worlds induces an ordering source where more probable worlds are ranked higher. For each world v, the ordering source generates the proposition "at least as probable as v": λ w => decide (P(w) ≥ P(v))

This means w ≥_A z iff every probability threshold that z meets, w also meets, which reduces to P(w) ≥ P(z).

Key result #

When the probability assignment is uniform, the induced ordering is trivial (all worlds equivalent). When skewed, the best worlds are those with maximal probability.

Reference: Kratzer, A. (2012). Modals and Conditionals. OUP. Ch. 2 §2.4.

Probability assignment #

@[reducible, inline]

A probability assignment maps worlds to rational probabilities.

Equations
Instances For

    Convert a probability assignment to a Kratzer ordering source.

    For each world v, generate the proposition "at least as probable as v": w satisfies this iff P(w) ≥ P(v). The resulting ordering ranks worlds by probability: w ≥_A z iff P(w) ≥ P(z).

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      probToOrdering is world-independent: the ordering source is the same regardless of which evaluation world is chosen.

      Concrete example #

      A uniform probability assignment: P(w) = 1/4 for all w.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Theorems #

        Uniform probability makes all worlds equivalent under the ordering. Every world satisfies the same set of ordering propositions (all of them).

        Under skewed P, best worlds (from universal base) = {w0}. w0 has the highest probability and dominates all others.

        Necessity under probability ordering: with skewed P and universal base, any proposition true at w0 is necessary (since best = {w0}).