Marginality Scales #
@cite{dinis-jacinto-2026}
ML theory enriches a linear order with a primitive "marginally smaller than"
relation M. From R (= <) and M one derives L (largely smaller than):
L(x,y) := x < y ∧ ¬ M x y. Five axioms govern M; Theorem 2.2 derives
M-TRANSITIVITY and M-BOUNDEDNESS as consequences.
This sits alongside DirectedMeasure (in Core.Scale): a DirectedMeasure
determines licensing from boundedness, while an MLScale adds granularity
structure (marginal vs. large difference) on the same LinearOrder.
- Dinis, B. & Jacinto, B. (2026). Marginality scales for gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 49:101–131.
ML theory (@cite{dinis-jacinto-2026}, Fig. 1): a linear order enriched with
a primitive "marginally smaller than" relation M satisfying five axioms.
The strict order < from LinearOrder is the paper's R;
L (largely smaller) is derived as R ∧ ¬M.
- M : α → α → Prop
x is marginally smaller than y (primitive)
Axiom 1: ∃ x y, L(x,y) — largely different elements exist
Axiom 2: M(x,y) → R(x,y)
- m_irrelevance (x y z : α) : self.M x y → (z < y ∧ ¬self.M z y → z < x ∧ ¬self.M z x) ∧ (x < z ∧ ¬self.M x z → y < z ∧ ¬self.M y z)
Axiom 3 (M-IRRELEVANCE): marginal steps preserve large-gap structure
- r_extends_l (x y z : α) : x < y → (y < z ∧ ¬self.M y z → x < z ∧ ¬self.M x z) ∧ (z < x ∧ ¬self.M z x → z < y ∧ ¬self.M z y)
Axiom 4: R extends along L — smaller-than propagates through large gaps
- decomposition (x y : α) : x < y ∧ ¬self.M x y → (∃ (z : α), self.M x z ∧ z < y ∧ ¬self.M z y) ∧ ∃ (w : α), self.M w y ∧ x < w ∧ ¬self.M x w
Axiom 5 (DECOMPOSITION): every large gap decomposes via a marginal step
Instances For
Marginal difference (Def 2.3): M(x,y) ∨ M(y,x).
Equations
- ml.MarginalDiff x y = (ml.M x y ∨ ml.M y x)
Instances For
At most marginal difference: x = y ∨ MarginalDiff(x,y). The equivalence relation on degrees induced by M.
Equations
- ml.AtMostMarginal x y = (x = y ∨ ml.MarginalDiff x y)
Instances For
Theorem 2.2, part 1 (M-TRANSITIVITY): M is transitive. If x is marginally smaller than y and y marginally smaller than z, then x is marginally smaller than z. Proof: ¬L(y,z) since M(y,z); Axiom 3 contrapositive gives ¬L(x,z); since R(x,z), this forces M(x,z).
Theorem 2.2, part 2 (M-BOUNDEDNESS): if x is marginally smaller than z and y is between them (x < y < z), then both gaps are marginal.