Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Semantics.Degree.Superlative

Superlative Semantics #

@cite{heim-1999} @cite{sharvit-stateva-2002} @cite{szabolcsi-1986}

Compositional semantics for the superlative morpheme -est/most.

@cite{heim-1999}: Absolute vs. Relative #

@cite{heim-1999} identifies two readings of superlatives:

The two readings arise from the scope of -est relative to other operators: wide scope yields relative, narrow scope yields absolute.

def Semantics.Degree.Superlative.absoluteSuperlative {Entity : Type u_1} {D : Type u_2} [LinearOrder D] (μ : EntityD) (C : Set Entity) (x : Entity) :

Absolute superlative: x is the G-est entity in comparison class C. "The tallest mountain" = the mountain x in C such that for all y ≠ x in C, height(x) > height(y).

Equations
Instances For
    def Semantics.Degree.Superlative.relativeSuperlative {Alt : Type u_1} {Entity : Type u_2} {D : Type u_3} [LinearOrder D] (μ : EntityD) (f : AltEntity) (focusedAlt : Alt) (alternatives : Set Alt) :

    Relative superlative: x has a higher degree than all focus alternatives. "KIM climbed the highest mountain" = Kim's mountain is higher than anyone else's.

    f maps each alternative (person) to the relevant entity (the mountain they climbed). Focus alternatives determine the comparison.

    Equations
    Instances For
      theorem Semantics.Degree.Superlative.absolute_unique {Entity : Type u_1} {D : Type u_2} [LinearOrder D] (μ : EntityD) (C : Set Entity) (x y : Entity) (hx : absoluteSuperlative μ C x) (hy : absoluteSuperlative μ C y) :
      x = y

      The absolute superlative is unique (at most one entity satisfies it) when the ordering is strict.