Superlative Semantics #
@cite{heim-1999} @cite{sharvit-stateva-2002} @cite{szabolcsi-1986}
Compositional semantics for the superlative morpheme -est/most.
@cite{heim-1999}: Absolute vs. Relative #
@cite{heim-1999} identifies two readings of superlatives:
Absolute: "Kim climbed the highest mountain" = the mountain that is highest of all mountains. ⟦-est⟧ = λC.λG.λx. x ∈ C ∧ ∀y ∈ C, y ≠ x → G(x) > G(y)
Relative: "KIM climbed the highest mountain" = the mountain that Kim climbed is higher than what anyone else climbed. Focus on "Kim" determines the comparison set.
The two readings arise from the scope of -est relative to other
operators: wide scope yields relative, narrow scope yields absolute.
Absolute superlative: x is the G-est entity in comparison class C. "The tallest mountain" = the mountain x in C such that for all y ≠ x in C, height(x) > height(y).
Equations
Instances For
Relative superlative: x has a higher degree than all focus alternatives. "KIM climbed the highest mountain" = Kim's mountain is higher than anyone else's.
f maps each alternative (person) to the relevant entity
(the mountain they climbed). Focus alternatives determine
the comparison.
Equations
- Semantics.Degree.Superlative.relativeSuperlative μ f focusedAlt alternatives = ∀ a ∈ alternatives, a ≠ focusedAlt → μ (f focusedAlt) > μ (f a)
Instances For
The absolute superlative is unique (at most one entity satisfies it) when the ordering is strict.