Rett's Order-Sensitive MAX Framework #
@cite{rett-2026} @cite{rullmann-1995} @cite{schwarzschild-2008} @cite{krifka-2010b}
@cite{rett-2026} "Semantic Ambivalence and Expletive Negation": the comparative morpheme is an order-sensitive maximality operator MAX_R that picks the R-maximal element of a degree set.
This framework absorbs and extends the content previously in
Theories/Semantics/Lexical/Adjective/Comparative.lean, providing
a unified analysis of comparatives, temporal connectives, and
expletive negation licensing.
Key Ideas #
MAX_R: A domain-general maximality operator parameterized by a relation R. MAX_R(X) = {x ∈ X | ∀x' ∈ X, x' ≠ x → R x x'}. For
<, this gives the minimum; for>, the maximum.Ambidirectionality: A construction f is ambidirectional for B iff f(B) ↔ f(Bᶜ). This holds when MAX picks the same boundary from both B and its complement.
Expletive negation licensing: EN is licensed exactly in ambidirectional constructions, because negating the argument is truth-conditionally vacuous.
Manner implicature: EN triggers evaluativity — the marked form signals that the comparison/temporal relation is noteworthy.
Connections #
maxOnScaleandisAmbidirectionalare defined inCore.Scale- The comparative morpheme
comparativeSemis now inDegree.Comparative - EN predictions are in
Phenomena/Negation/Studies/Rett2026.lean
Comparative direction reuses scale polarity from Core.
positive: "taller" — MAX picks the highest degrees.
negative: "shorter" — MAX picks the lowest degrees.
Instances For
Rett/Schwarzschild comparative morpheme (eq. 47): "A is taller than B" iff MAX of A's degrees >_dir MAX of B's degrees.
For singleton degree sets {μ(a)} and {μ(b)}, MAX is trivial
(maxOnScale_singleton), so this reduces to direct comparison.
Equations
Instances For
MAX–direct bridge: the direct comparison μ(a) > μ(b) is
equivalent to the MAX-based formulation. This makes explicit that
rettComparative is a simplification of the general MAX-comparison,
justified by maxOnScale_singleton.
The comparative depends only on the boundary μ_b, not on whether the standard is B = {d | d ≤ μ_b} or any other set sharing that supremum. This captures Rett's ambidirectionality insight: since MAX₍≥₎({d | d ≤ μ_b}) = {μ_b}, the existential reduces to a direct comparison.
Equative boundary reduction: the equative also depends only on the boundary μ_b.
Manner implicature triggered by EN in an ambidirectional construction.
evaluative: the relation is noteworthy (large gap / early timing).
atypical: the EN form is pragmatically marked (optional, stylistic).
- evaluative : Bool
Does EN trigger an evaluative reading?
- atypical : Bool
Is the EN form pragmatically marked (optional, stylistic)?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
EN in ambidirectional constructions (comparatives, before-clauses) triggers evaluativity but is not atypical — it's a productive pattern cross-linguistically.