Compositional "How" — Degree Questions #
@cite{beck-rullmann-1999} @cite{fox-2007} @cite{rullmann-1995} @cite{fox-hackl-2006}
Compositional semantics of degree questions ("how tall is Kim?"),
connecting the syntactic structure of degree questions to the
maximality-based analysis in Theories/Semantics/Questions/DegreeQuestion.lean.
Compositional Structure #
"How tall is Kim?" = [CP [how [DegP d-tall]] [TP Kim is t_d]]
The wh-word "how" is a degree question operator that asks for the degree d such that the matrix clause is true:
⟦how⟧ = λP⟨d,t⟩. ?d. P(d)
In the Hamblin/Karttunen semantics, the answer set is: { p | ∃d. p = λw. height_w(Kim) ≥ d }
The maximally informative answer is the one with d = height(Kim) (@cite{fox-2007}: max⊨ applied to the answer set).
Bridge to Fox & Hackl #
Theories/Semantics/Questions/DegreeQuestion.lean provides:
- The UDM (universal density of measurement)
- Negative island analysis (density blocks max⊨ under negation)
- Modal obviation (universal modal rescues max⊨)
This module provides the compositional structure that feeds into that analysis.
The answer set of a degree question: the set of propositions of the form "μ(x) ≥ d" for each degree d.
For "how tall is Kim?", this is: { λw. height_w(Kim) ≥ d | d ∈ D }
The most informative answer has d = height(Kim).
Equations
Instances For
The maximally informative answer to "how tall is Kim?" is the degree d₀ such that "height(Kim) ≥ d₀" is true and entails all other true answers.
This connects to IsMaxInf from Core.Scale:
the maximally informative element of the "at least" degree property.
Equations
Instances For
The maximally informative answer exists iff the degree property has max⊨. For "at least d", this always exists (= the true value). For "more than d", this fails on dense scales (Fox & Hackl).
Equations
Instances For
Simple degree questions always have maximally informative answers (because "at least d" is a closed degree property).