Causal Necessity #
@cite{nadathur-2024} @cite{nadathur-lauer-2020}
Causal necessity semantics for the verb "cause." The core definition
causallyNecessary implements @cite{nadathur-2024} Definition 10b
(supersituation necessity with precondition + achievability + but-for),
superseding the simple but-for test from @cite{nadathur-lauer-2020}
Definition 24.
Insight #
"X caused Y" asserts that X was necessary for Y:
- Without X, Y would not have occurred (counterfactual dependence)
- X is a but-for cause: "but for X, not Y"
Formal Definition (@cite{nadathur-2024} Def 10b) #
⟨C, true⟩ is causally necessary for ⟨E, true⟩ relative to situation s iff:
- Precondition: s ⊭_D ⟨C, true⟩ and s ⊭_D ⟨E, true⟩
- (i) Achievability: ∃ consistent supersituation s' of s[C↦true] with E ∉ dom(s') where s' ⊨_D ⟨E, true⟩
- (ii) But-for: ¬∃ consistent supersituation s' of s with E ∉ dom(s') satisfying s' ⊨_D ⟨E, true⟩ while s' ⊭_D ⟨C, true⟩
Linguistic Examples #
"The short circuit caused the fire"
- Without the short circuit, the fire wouldn't have started
- The short circuit was necessary (in that context)
"Kim's actions caused Sandy to leave"
- If Kim hadn't acted, Sandy would have stayed
- Kim's action was a but-for cause
Necessity vs Sufficiency #
| Verb | Semantics | Test |
|---|---|---|
| cause | Necessity (Def 10b) | No consistent supersituation achieves E without C |
| make | Sufficiency (Def 23) | Does adding C guarantee E? |
These can come apart in overdetermination cases:
- Lightning AND arsonist both present
- Lightning sufficient for fire
- Lightning NOT necessary (arsonist would have caused it anyway)
Semantics of "cause": effect occurred AND cause was necessary. Necessity uses @cite{nadathur-2024} Def 10b (supersituation test).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
An alternative sufficient cause makes the original unnecessary.
Requires positive dynamics (no inhibitory connections) and c1 ≠ c2: in positive dynamics, setting c1 = false doesn't trigger new laws, so the sufficient alternative c2 still fires the effect. Without positivity, a law with precondition (c1, false) could inhibit the effect.
Under Def 10b, this follows from the precondition check: if c2 is
sufficient and present in s, then the effect is already causally entailed
by s (via monotonicity), so the precondition s ⊭_D ⟨effect, true⟩ fails.
Sufficiency does NOT imply necessity (overdetermination).
Necessity does NOT imply sufficiency (conjunctive causes).
INUS cause (Mackie): insufficient but necessary part of an unnecessary but sufficient condition.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Actual causation: C factually occurred, E factually occurred, and C was causally necessary for E.
Under @cite{nadathur-2024} Definition 10b, necessity must be tested
against a background that does NOT contain the cause (the precondition
rejects situations where cause is already entailed). We strip the cause
from s via s.remove cause before passing to causeSem.
This is the retrospective causal judgment: "did C actually cause E in situation s?"
Equations
- NadathurLauer2020.Necessity.actuallyCaused dyn s cause effect = (s.hasValue cause true && NadathurLauer2020.Necessity.causeSem dyn (s.remove cause) cause effect)
Instances For
actuallyCaused is causeSem applied to the actual situation with
the cause stripped from the background.
Actual causation implies the cause occurred.
Actual causation implies the effect occurred.
Actual causation implies causal necessity.