Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Semantics.Causation.ComplementEntailing

Causal Frame: Unified Abstraction for Complement-Entailing Constructions #

@cite{nadathur-2023} @cite{nadathur-lauer-2020}

The single parameterized type underlying implicative verbs (manage, fail), ability modals (be able, sak), light verbs (le), and degree constructions (enough/too).

The Unifying Abstraction #

All complement-entailing constructions share the same causal skeleton:

  1. A causal dynamics (structural equations)
  2. A trigger variable (action, degree threshold, managing event)
  3. A complement variable (the VP outcome)
  4. A background function mapping evaluation contexts to causal situations
  5. An actualization mode controlling what asserts trigger occurrence

The actuality inference in all cases reduces to the same syllogism:

Actualization Mode #

The key parameter distinguishing implicatives from ability modals (@cite{nadathur-2023}, Chapter 1):

InstanceTriggerActualization
managemanaging event.lexical (aspect-independent)
le (Hindi LV)volitional choice.lexical (aspect-independent)
be able / sakagent's action.aspectual (PFV/IMPF)
enough to VPdegree ≥ θ.aspectual (PFV/IMPF)

How the actuality of the trigger gets asserted.

  • lexical: The verb's lexical semantics asserts that the trigger occurred. The complement entailment holds regardless of grammatical aspect. (manage, fail, force, prevent, le)

  • aspectual: Grammatical aspect determines whether the trigger's occurrence is asserted. Perfective asserts it; imperfective doesn't. (be able, sak, enough to VP, too Adj to VP)

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      CausalFrame: The abstract frame underlying all complement-entailing verb constructions.

      Parameterized by W (evaluation context type):

      • W = Unit for implicative verbs (no modal dimension)
      • W = World for ability modals (Kripke worlds)
      • W = World for degree constructions (degree evaluated at worlds)

      The frame bundles:

      • Causal model (dynamics + trigger + complement)
      • Background projection (evaluation context → causal situation)
      • Actualization mode (what controls trigger assertion)

      All complement-entailing constructions are instances differing only in the choice of W, actualization, and what the "trigger" represents.

      Instances For

        Trigger is causally sufficient for complement at evaluation context w.

        Equations
        Instances For

          Complement is actualized at w: trigger occurred AND complement developed.

          Equations
          Instances For

            The complement did NOT develop at w (for negative-polarity verbs like fail, too Adj to VP).

            Equations
            Instances For

              Generic actuality predicate with aspectual modulation.

              • Lexical: sufficiency AND actualization (always, regardless of aspect)
              • Aspectual + perfective: sufficiency AND actualization
              • Aspectual + imperfective: sufficiency only (no actualization required)

              This is the single function from which the semantics of manage, ability modals, and degree constructions are all derived.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Generic actuality theorem (lexical mode): if a lexically-actualized frame holds, the complement is actualized.

                This is the abstract version of the entailment pattern for manage.

                Generic actuality theorem (aspectual + perfective): if an aspect-governed frame holds with perfective aspect, the complement is actualized.

                This is the abstract version of actuality entailments for ability modals and degree constructions.

                Generic non-entailment (aspectual + imperfective): imperfective aspect is compatible with complement not being actualized.

                This is the abstract version of the observation that imperfective ability modals don't entail their complements.

                Aspect governs actuality (generic): the same frame yields different entailment patterns under different aspects, demonstrated with a frame over Bool where true = action performed, false = not.

                Lexical mode is aspect-independent: the result is the same for perfective and imperfective when the trigger is present.

                This captures manage being aspect-independent: the entailment doesn't change with aspect because the lexical semantics already asserts trigger occurrence.

                Imperfective is pure sufficiency for aspectually-governed frames: imperfective asserts only causal sufficiency, with no event actualization.

                Causal sufficiency in a frame is monotone for positive dynamics: adding truths to the background preserves sufficiency.

                This is the frame-level version of sufficiency_monotone_positive.

                Construct an ability-modal CausalFrame: a world-indexed causal model where actualization is governed by aspect (not lexical assertion).

                Each possible world w : World projects to a Situation in the causal model via background. Ability at w reduces to causal sufficiency in the projected situation.

                • Imperfective: sufficiency only (pure ability, compatible with complement unrealized)
                • Perfective: sufficiency AND actualization (actuality entailment)

                This replaces the former AbilityScenario structure — ability modals are just CausalFrame World with actualization = .aspectual.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Ability differs from implicative verbs: ability can hold without actualization (impossible for manage).

                  For manage (.lexical mode), actualityWithAspect ALWAYS includes complement truth. For ability (.aspectual mode), only perfective aspect forces complement truth.

                  Aspect governs actuality for ability: the same ability frame yields different entailment patterns under different aspects.

                  With perfective: ability → complement actualized. With imperfective: ability ↛ complement actualized.

                  For positive dynamics, normalDevelopment is a closure operator on (Situation, trueLE): 1. Inflationary: s ⊑ cl(s) 2. Monotone: s₁ ⊑ s₂ → cl(s₁) ⊑ cl(s₂) 3. Idempotent: cl(cl(s)) = cl(s)

                  Causal sufficiency is **closure membership**: `complement = true ∈ cl(s + trigger)`.
                  This is the deep structural reason all complement-entailing constructions work. 
                  

                  Causal sufficiency as closure membership. Sufficiency IS asking whether the complement is in the closure of the extended situation.

                  An ImplicativeScenario is a CausalFrame Unit with lexical actualization.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For