Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Pragmatics.RSA.ScalarImplicatures.Embedded.Questions

RSA Question Embedding #

@cite{geurts-2010} @cite{hamblin-1973b} @cite{groenendijk-stokhof-1984}

Models scalar implicatures embedded in questions.

The Phenomenon #

"Did some students pass?"

Questions have a unique status regarding scalar implicatures:

Theoretical Background #

Questions are often analyzed as sets of propositions or partitions of logical space. The key insight:

A question "Did some students pass?" asks the hearer to choose between:

If the implicature "not all" is computed:

The second option doesn't make sense, suggesting local SI in questions is problematic.

Predictions #

Unlike assertions (where local SI strengthens) or DE contexts (where local SI weakens), questions create an asymmetry:

RSA should predict: Local SI is dispreferred in questions because it makes one answer pragmatically odd.

Student outcome for question scenario.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

      A yes/no question partitions the world into "yes" and "no" answers.

      For "Did some students pass?":

      • Yes-worlds: where some (>=1) passed
      • No-worlds: where none passed
      Instances For

        Interpretations of "Did some students pass?":

        1. Global: "some" = at least one
        • Yes: someP, allP (some passed)
        • No: noneP (none passed)
        1. Local: "some" = some-but-not-all
        • Yes: someP (some-but-not-all passed)
        • No: noneP, allP (?? disjunctive/weird)
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

            The partition induced by each interpretation.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Global interpretation gives a natural partition:

              • Yes = some passed (continuous region on scale)
              • No = none passed (complementary region)

              Local interpretation gives a strange partition:

              • Yes = some-but-not-all (specific point)
              • No = none OR all (disjunctive!)

              This disjunctive "no" answer is pragmatically odd.

              The "no" answer under local interpretation is disjunctive. This is marked by the worlds being non-contiguous on the scale.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Under local interpretation, the "all" world gets a "no" answer, which is pragmatically bizarre.

                RSA predicts: global interpretation preferred for questions.

                Reason: Local creates pragmatically odd partition where "all passed" is a "no" answer.

                Questions differ from all other embedding contexts:

                • Not about entailment direction (like DE vs UE)
                • About pragmatic naturalness of the question-answer structure
                Instances For

                  Questions are indeed unique - neither DE-like nor attitude-verb-like in their entailment pattern, yet still prefer global.

                  Equations
                  Instances For