Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Pragmatics.RSA.ScalarImplicatures.Embedded.Attitudes

RSA Attitude Verb Embedding #

@cite{chierchia-fox-spector-2012} @cite{geurts-2010} @cite{sauerland-2004}

Models scalar implicatures embedded under attitude verbs like "believe".

The Phenomenon #

"John believes some students passed"

Can have two readings:

  1. Global: John believes [some passed] - speaker implicates "not all"
  2. Local: John believes [some-but-not-all passed] - John's belief includes "not all"

Unlike DE contexts, attitude verbs allow BOTH interpretations.

Theoretical Background #

Attitude verbs create INTENSIONAL contexts:

This differs from DE contexts where:

With attitude verbs:

Student outcomes in the actual world and John's beliefs.

For "John believes some students passed", we need to track:

  1. How many students ACTUALLY passed
  2. How many students JOHN BELIEVES passed
Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      World state tracking both reality and John's beliefs.

      Key insight: John's beliefs may differ from reality!

      • John might believe "some passed" when actually "all passed"
      • John might believe "all passed" when actually "some passed"
      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            Equations
            Instances For

              The actual world determines what's true at the matrix level

              Equations
              Instances For

                John's beliefs determine what's true in embedded contexts

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Two possible interpretations of "John believes some students passed":

                  1. Global: The "some" gets its weak meaning; implicature computed at matrix
                  • Literal: John believes [∃x. student(x) ∧ passed(x)]
                  • Implicature: Speaker implicates John doesn't believe all passed
                  1. Local: The "some" gets strong meaning inside the belief
                  • Literal: John believes [∃x. student(x) ∧ passed(x) ∧ ¬∀y. student(y) → passed(y)]
                  • = John believes some-but-not-all passed
                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                      Truth conditions for "John believes some students passed".

                      • Global: True iff John believes at least one passed (The "not all" is an implicature about the speaker's claim)

                      • Local: True iff John believes some-but-not-all passed (The "not all" is part of what John believes)

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        For comparison: "John believes all students passed" (unambiguous).

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          For comparison: "John believes no students passed" (unambiguous).

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            Relevant worlds for the attitude embedding scenario.

                            We focus on cases where John has a definite belief about the students. (More complex models could include uncertainty in John's beliefs.)

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                              Utterances for the attitude scenario.

                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For
                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.

                                  Under global interpretation:

                                  • "John believes some" is true in worlds where John believes ≥1 passed
                                  • This includes both johnBelieves =.someO AND johnBelieves =.allO

                                  Under local interpretation:

                                  • "John believes some" is true only when John believes some-but-not-all
                                  • johnBelieves =.allO makes it FALSE

                                  Semantic grounding for "some students passed" as a proposition.

                                  At a world, "some students passed" is true iff ≥1 student passed. We model this with StudentOutcome:

                                  • .noneO → false
                                  • .someO → true (some but not all)
                                  • .allO → true (all, which entails some)
                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    Semantic grounding for "some-but-not-all students passed".

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      Semantic grounding for "all students passed".

                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        Grounding Theorem 1: The global meaning corresponds to Montague semantics.

                                        Global interpretation: "John believes some passed" = John's belief state satisfies "some passed" = somePassedProp(johnBelieves) = true

                                        This theorem proves the stipulated johnBelievesSome equals the compositional evaluation somePassedProp.

                                        Grounding Theorem 2: The local meaning corresponds to Montague semantics.

                                        Local interpretation: "John believes some-but-not-all passed" = John's belief state satisfies "some-but-not-all passed" = someNotAllPassedProp(johnBelieves) = true

                                        Grounding Theorem 3: The unambiguous "believes all" is grounded.

                                        Semantic entailment grounding: "some-not-all" entails "some" at the propositional level.

                                        This explains why local_entails_global holds: it follows from the semantics.