Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Pragmatics.RSA.Implementations.QingEtAl2016

@cite{qing-goodman-lassiter-2016} @cite{qing-goodman-lassiter-2016} @cite{scontras-tonhauser-2025} @cite{warstadt-2022} #

RSA Projective Content Model. The original formulation of the joint-inference-over-(world, context) model for presupposition projection. @cite{scontras-tonhauser-2025} and @cite{warstadt-2022} are mathematically equivalent instances applied to different domains.

The Model #

L1 jointly infers the world state and the context set C (what's in the common ground). Projection emerges because:

  1. "John didn't stop smoking" is under-informative in the full universe
  2. But it's informative if the listener assumes the speaker has taken "John smoked in the past" for granted (i.e., +past in C)
  3. L1 infers that C = +past best explains the utterance

Domain: Change-of-State Verbs #

Utterances about John's smoking habit:

Context sets:

Predictions #

  1. "John didn't stop smoking" -> P(+past in C | utterance) > prior (presupposition projects through negation)

  2. QUD sensitivity: projection is stronger when QUD = now? (non-at-issue content projects more)

World state: John's smoking status at two time points.

Following Qing et al., a world is a pair (past, now) where:

  • past: John smoked in the past
  • now: John smokes now
Instances For
    Equations
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        Equations
        Instances For

          All four world states

          Equations
          Instances For

            Context set: which facts are established in the common ground.

            Following Qing et al., we model context sets as constraints on worlds. A context set C is the set of worlds compatible with what's taken for granted.

            We use named context sets rather than arbitrary subsets for tractability.

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                All context sets

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Utterances about John's smoking, following Qing et al.'s example.

                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Activity predicate: "smokes" at the current time.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Activity predicate: "smoked" in the past.

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            Our semantics follow the CoS pattern: cessation presupposes prior state, asserts negation of current state.

                            Note: The Montague CoS module defines semantics over a single predicate P, while our worlds have separate past/now fields. The correspondence is:

                            • "stopped smoking" = prior state held (past=true), current state doesn't (now=false)
                            • This matches cessation: presup P, assert not-P

                            Questions Under Discussion, following Qing et al.

                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  QUD projection: two worlds are equivalent if they give the same QUD answer.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    World prior: uniform

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      Connection to @cite{scontras-tonhauser-2025} and @cite{warstadt-2022} #

                                      This implementation demonstrates that @cite{qing-goodman-lassiter-2016} uses the same mathematical structure as S&T and Warstadt:

                                      Component@cite{qing-goodman-lassiter-2016}@cite{scontras-tonhauser-2025}@cite{warstadt-2022}
                                      World(past, now)(BEL, C)(hasDog, sick)
                                      Latent varContextSetBeliefStateContext
                                      ConstraintcompatibleBoolspeakerCredenceBoolcompatibleBool
                                      MeasureprojectionOfPastprojectionOfCaccommodationStrength

                                      All three use the latent variable in the BeliefState slot. The differences are purely domain-specific.

                                      The Unified Equation #

                                      All three implement:

                                      L1(w, C | u, Q) proportional-to S1(u | w, C, Q) * P(w) * P(C)
                                      

                                      Where: