Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Phonology.StratalOT

Stratal Optimality Theory #

@cite{kiparsky-2000}

Stratal OT is a theory of the phonology-morphology interface where phonological computation is cyclic: it applies at multiple levels (strata) of morphological structure, with the output of each stratum feeding the next as input.

Architecture #

The derivation proceeds through ordered strata:

Stem → Word → Phrase

Each stratum has:

  1. A constraint ranking (which may differ from other strata)
  2. A GEN function (producing candidates from the previous output)
  3. An EVAL function (selecting the optimal candidate)

The crucial property is constraint reranking: the same constraint can occupy different positions in different strata's rankings. This captures level-ordering effects — e.g., compensatory lengthening is optimal at the Word level but not at the Phrase level — without ad hoc rules or extrinsic ordering.

Connection to Linglib #

Each individual stratum is evaluated using Core.OT.buildTableau and OTTableau.optimal. This module adds the stratal architecture: strata ordering, cross-stratal chaining, and reranking specification.

The Telugu weak alternation (@cite{aitha-2026}) is a key application: the interaction of IDENT-STRESS with FT-BIN across Stem, Word, and Phrase strata derives the -am/-āni alternation from a single underlying form.

The three phonological strata of Stratal OT (@cite{kiparsky-2000}).

StratumDomainMorphological boundary
StemRoot + derivational mfxInnermost cycle
WordStem + inflectional sfxProsodic word (PrWd) edge
PhraseWords + clitics + PPhonological phrase edge

Each stratum corresponds to a morphological domain. The Stem–Word boundary typically aligns with the edge of the prosodic word.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Strata are linearly ordered: stem < word < phrase. This ordering reflects the direction of morphological derivation (innermost to outermost) and determines the feeding relation.

      Equations
      Instances For
        def Theories.Phonology.StratalOT.evalStratum {C : Type} [DecidableEq C] (_stratum : Stratum) (candidates : List C) (ranking : List (Core.OT.NamedConstraint C)) (h : candidates []) :

        Evaluate a single stratum: select optimal candidates from a candidate set under a constraint ranking.

        Thin wrapper around buildTableau + optimal that labels the evaluation with its stratum.

        Equations
        Instances For
          def Theories.Phonology.StratalOT.chainEval {C₁ C₂ : Type} [DecidableEq C₂] (_stratum : Stratum) (s₁Output : C₁) (bridge : C₁List C₂) (ranking : List (Core.OT.NamedConstraint C₂)) (hBridge : bridge s₁Output []) :
          List C₂

          Chain two strata: take the optimal output of stratum s₁, transform it into candidates for stratum s₂ via a bridge function, and evaluate under s₂'s ranking.

          The bridge function is language-specific: it adds morphological material from the next layer (e.g., inflectional suffixes at the Word level, postpositions at the Phrase level) and generates candidate representations.

          Equations
          Instances For

            The full derivational history across all three strata. Records the input and output at each level.

            Type parameters:

            • S: candidate type at the Stem level
            • W: candidate type at the Word level
            • P: candidate type at the Phrase level

            Candidate types differ across strata because GEN produces different representations at each level (e.g., metrical parses at Stem level, segmental modifications at Word level).

            • underlyingForm : S

              Underlying representation (input to the Stem stratum).

            • stemOutput : S

              Optimal output of the Stem stratum.

            • wordOutput : W

              Optimal output of the Word stratum.

            • phraseOutput : P

              Optimal output of the Phrase stratum (= surface form).

            Instances For

              The surface form is the output of the final (Phrase) stratum.

              Equations
              Instances For

                A constraint identity: name and family, independent of ranking position. The same ConstraintId can appear at different positions in different strata's rankings — this is the core mechanism of Stratal OT.

                Contrast with NamedConstraint, which bundles the identity with an evaluation function (tied to a specific candidate type).

                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Extract the identity from a named constraint.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Find the rank (position) of a constraint by name within a ranking. Position 0 = highest-ranked. Returns none if the constraint is not active at this stratum.

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          Is constraint name ranked higher (closer to position 0) in ranking r₁ than in r₂? Captures promotion across strata.

                          Example: ONSET is promoted from Word to Phrase level in Telugu (@cite{aitha-2026} §5.3), switching from below IDENT-STRESS to above it.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Is constraint name ranked lower in r₁ than in r₂? Captures demotion across strata.

                            Example: *DIST-0 is demoted from Word to Phrase level in Telugu (@cite{aitha-2026} §5.3), allowing consonant retention at phrase boundaries.

                            Equations
                            Instances For
                              @[reducible, inline]

                              A Hasse pair (a, b) means constraint a strictly dominates constraint b (a ≫ b). Lists of such pairs specify a partial order on constraints.

                              For classical OT, the transitive closure must be a total order. For comparative tableaux (@cite{prince-2002}), partial specifications suffice.

                              Example: the Stem-level ranking in Telugu (@cite{aitha-2026} §5.1) is specified as:

                              [("FT-BIN(μ)", "PARSE-SYL"), ("PARSE-SYL", "ALL-FT-LEFT")]
                              
                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Does constraint a immediately dominate b in the specification?

                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Does constraint a dominate b (reflexive transitive closure, depth ≤ 3)? Sufficient for the ranking chains encountered in practice (typically 5–8 constraints per stratum).

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    Output feeding: the output of stratum s is well-formed input for stratum s+1. This is the fundamental architectural claim of Stratal OT — phonological computation is cyclic, and each cycle can change the representation in ways that feed or bleed processes at the next cycle.

                                    Key empirical consequence (@cite{aitha-2026}): compensatory lengthening is optimal at the Word level (MAX ≫ ALIGN-RIGHT) but not at the Phrase level (constraint reranking), producing different outputs for the same segmental configuration at different strata.

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For